1,721,937 research outputs found
Class of 2017
No full textClass of 2017 Graduation Photohttps://archives.law.nccu.edu/graduation-photos/1007/thumbnail.jp
Senior Class of 2017
No full textAEM Department. (2017). Senior Class of 2017. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/196592
Class of 2017 Rings
No full textRing Figure. Rings for the Class of 2017 before they were given out during ceremony held in Cameron Hall Nov. 20, 2015
LL.M., Class of 2017
No full textThis photograph was taken of the entering LL.M. class of 2017 on August 15, 2016 during their orientation.https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/entering/1010/thumbnail.jp
04. Class of 2017 Commencement
No full textClass of 2017 Commencement, May 13, 2017.https://scholarship.law.uci.edu/uci_law_stories_images_early-accomplishments-milestones_incline/1003/thumbnail.jp
Class of 2017-2019
Get PDFThis facebook, created for the 2016-2017 school year, contains photos of the Class of 2017, Class of 2018, and Class of 2019.https://scholarship.richmond.edu/class-facebooks/1022/thumbnail.jp
Class of 2017 Photo
No full textThe Class of 2017 were hooded and received their diplomas Saturday, May 20. The group of more than 240 graduates celebrated in the Joyce Center, thanks to South Bend’s rainy spring weather.https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/commencement_photos/1009/thumbnail.jp
"Congrats Class of 2017" posters
Get PDFThese posters were created by the Mugar Greene Scholars to celebrate the graduation of the class of 2017
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
