1,720,979 research outputs found
Schistoloma leferi Morelet 1861
No full textSchistoloma leferi (Morelet, 1861) Cyclostoma leferi Morelet, 1861: 176. Schistoloma leferi — Kobelt, 1902: 279. Type locality. Not specified.Published as part of Páll-Gergely, Barna, Nguyen, Phi Khanh & Chen, Yansen, 2019, A review of Vietnamese Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902 with a list of all known species of the genus (Caenogastropoda: Cyclophoroidea: Pupinidae), pp. 322-327 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 67 on page 326, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2019-0023, http://zenodo.org/record/457705
A review of Vietnamese Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902 with a list of all known species of the genus (Caenogastropoda: Cyclophoroidea: Pupinidae)
Get PDFFig 2. A, Schistoloma maydelineae new species, holotype HNHM 103476; B, Sculpture and suture of upper whorls; C, Sculpture of the last whorl. Photographs by: B. Páll-Gergely. Scale "a" = 10 mm and refers to fig. A, scale "b" = 5 mm and refers to figs. B and C.Published as part of Páll-Gergely, Barna, Nguyen, Phi Khanh & Chen, Yansen, 2019, A review of Vietnamese Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902 with a list of all known species of the genus (Caenogastropoda: Cyclophoroidea: Pupinidae), pp. 322-327 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 67 on page 325, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2019-0023, http://zenodo.org/record/457705
Schistoloma longyanensis Zhou, Zhang & Chen 2009
No full textSchistoloma longyanensis Zhou, Zhang & Chen, 2009 Schistoloma longyanensis Zhou, Zhang & Chen, 2009: 122, figs 1–8. Type locality. "Forest Park, Longyan City (25°01′N, 117°00′E), Fujian Province, China ".Published as part of Páll-Gergely, Barna, Nguyen, Phi Khanh & Chen, Yansen, 2019, A review of Vietnamese Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902 with a list of all known species of the genus (Caenogastropoda: Cyclophoroidea: Pupinidae), pp. 322-327 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 67 on page 326, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2019-0023, http://zenodo.org/record/457705
Schistoloma messageri
No full text<i>Schistoloma messageri</i> (Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1909) <p>(Fig. 1B)</p> <p> <i>Coptochilus messageri</i> Bavay & Dautzenberg, 1909: 286, plate 11, figs 10–11 (type locality: “ Region de Lao-Kay ”).</p> <p> <b>Types examined.</b> Tonkin, Lao Kay, Coll. C. Bosch ex coll. H. Rolle, SMF 192263 /4 shells (labelled as syntype, Fig. 1B).</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> A large <i>Schistoloma</i> species with smooth, elongate-ovoid shell having a strong periumbilical keel. Differs from <i>Schistoloma cochinchinense</i> by the smaller, more slender shell, and more prominent keel.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> <i>Schistoloma cochinchinense</i> is known from Northern Vietnam (Lao Kay Province).</p>Published as part of <i>Páll-Gergely, Barna, Nguyen, Phi Khanh & Chen, Yansen, 2019, A review of Vietnamese Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902 with a list of all known species of the genus (Caenogastropoda: Cyclophoroidea: Pupinidae), pp. 322-327 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 67</i> on page 325, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2019-0023, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4577058">http://zenodo.org/record/4577058</a>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Schistoloma mcgregori Bartsch 1916
No full text<i>Schistoloma mcgregori</i> Bartsch, 1916 <p> <i>Schistoloma</i> (<i>Schistoloma</i>) <i>mcgregori mcgregori</i> Bartsch, 1916: 200, plate 51, figs. 2, 4.</p> <p> <i>Schistoloma</i> (<i>Schistoloma</i>) <i>mcgregori tablasensis</i> Bartsch, 1916: 201. <b>new synonym</b></p> <p> <i>Schistoloma</i> (<i>Schistoloma</i>) <i>mcgregori webbi</i> Bartsch, 1916: 202. <b>new synonym</b></p> <p> <b>Type locality.</b> “ Semarara Island ” (for the nominotypical subspecies).</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> We have not examined the type specimens, but based on the descriptions it became obvious that the differences are so slight (only differing in colour of peristome), that the subspecies of Bartsch (1916) cannot be maintained.</p>Published as part of <i>Páll-Gergely, Barna, Nguyen, Phi Khanh & Chen, Yansen, 2019, A review of Vietnamese Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902 with a list of all known species of the genus (Caenogastropoda: Cyclophoroidea: Pupinidae), pp. 322-327 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 67</i> on page 326, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2019-0023, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4577058">http://zenodo.org/record/4577058</a>
Genetic analysis of milk urea concentration and its genetic relationship with selected traits of interest in Holstein
No full textSchistoloma Kobelt 1902
No full textSchistoloma cochinchinense (Rochebrune, 1882) (Fig. 1A) Catalus cochinchinensis Rochebrune, 1882: 62 (type locality: "Sanglu, Cochinchine"). Schistoloma cochinchinense — Kobelt, 1902: 279. Schistoloma funiculata — Thach, 2016: 39, fig. 121. Schistoloma cochinchinense — Egorov, 2013: 14, fig. 22c. Types examined. Not examined. Additional material examined. Ðồng Nai Province, 20 km east of Long Khánh, Núi Ch ứa Chan, 100 m southwest of Chùa Bửu Quang, 470 m a.s.l., 10.950260°N, 107.371347°E, leg. A. Hunyadi, 02.02.2019, HA/23, HNHM 103478 (Fig. 1A); Ðồng Nai Province, 20 km east of Long Khánh, Núi Ch ứa Chan, 80 m east Chùa Bửu Quang, 10.950635°N 107.373400°E, leg. A. Hunyadi, 02.02.2019, HA/6; Ðồng Nai Province, ca. 1.5 km from Vườn Qu ốc Gia Cát Tiên towards Bàu S ấu, along the path, 11.454449°N 107.366197°E, leg. A. Hunyadi, 03.02.2019, HA/16; Ðồng Nai Province, Vườn Qu ốc Gia Cát Tiên, 7.1 km from ferryboat harbour towards Bàu S ấu on the main road, 160 m a.s.l., 11.447651°N 107.383646°E, leg. A. Hunyadi, 03.02.2019, HA/2. Diagnosis. A large Schistoloma species with smooth, elongate-ovoid shell having a strong periumbilical keel. Differs from Schistoloma messageri by the larger, more ovoid shell, and less prominent keel. Distribution. Schistoloma cochinchinense is known from Southern Vietnam (Dong Nai and Binh Phuoc Provinces). Remarks. The photos of Thach (2016) clearly show Schistoloma cochinchinense instead of Schistoloma funiculalum.Published as part of Páll-Gergely, Barna, Nguyen, Phi Khanh & Chen, Yansen, 2019, A review of Vietnamese Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902 with a list of all known species of the genus (Caenogastropoda: Cyclophoroidea: Pupinidae), pp. 322-327 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 67 on page 323, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2019-0023, http://zenodo.org/record/457705
Schistoloma sectilabrum
No full text<i>Schistoloma sectilabrum</i> (A. Gould, 1844) <p> <i>Cyclostoma sectilabrum</i> Gould, 1844: 459, plate 24, fig. 10 (type locality: “Tavoy” [from the title]).</p> <p> <i>Schistoloma sectilabrum</i> — Kobelt, 1902: 280.</p> <p> <i>Schistoloma sectilabrum</i> — Thach, 2016: 38, figs. 119–120.</p> <p> <i>Schistoloma sectilabrum</i> — Egorov, 2013: 14, fig. 22d–f.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> See Remarks.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> Thach (2016) mentioned this species from southern Vietnam (Ninh Hoa District, Khanh Hoa Province), far from all other known localities in the Malay Peninsula, Myanmar (Tavoy and Tenasserim) and Thailand (Tumpeesuwan & Panha, 2008). This species seems to have the largest range in the entire genus.</p> <p> Two samples (SMF 262529 = “ holotype ” and SMF 262530 = “ paratypes ”) found in the SMF were labelled as “ <i>Schistoloma siamensis</i> Brandt” with the following locality data: “ Thailand: an den Tanto-Fällen bei Ban Nong Star; Yala Provinz, leg. Brandt, 18-7-1964, No. 1968/1”. However, the name “ <i>Schistoloma siamensis</i> ” was never published, and is not available.</p>Published as part of <i>Páll-Gergely, Barna, Nguyen, Phi Khanh & Chen, Yansen, 2019, A review of Vietnamese Schistoloma Kobelt, 1902 with a list of all known species of the genus (Caenogastropoda: Cyclophoroidea: Pupinidae), pp. 322-327 in Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 67</i> on pages 325-326, DOI: 10.26107/RBZ-2019-0023, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4577058">http://zenodo.org/record/4577058</a>
- …
