124,598 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
p53 can inhibit cell proliferation through caspase-mediated cleavage of ERK2/MAPK
Stimulation of the Ras/MAPK cascade can either activate p53 and promote replicative senescence and apoptosis, or degrade p53 and promote cell survival. Here we show that p53 can directly counteract the Ras/MAPK signaling by inactivating ERK2/MAPK. This inactivation is due to a caspase cleavage of the ERK2 protein and contributes to p53-mediated growth arrest. We found that in Ras-transformed cells, growth arrest induced by p53, but not p21Waf1, is associated with a strong reduction in ERK2 activity, phosphorylation, and protein half-life, and with the appearance of caspase activity. Likewise, DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest correlates with p53-dependent ERK2 downregulation and caspase activation. Furthermore, caspase inhibitors or expression of a caspase-resistant ERK2 mutant interfere with ERK2 cleavage and restore proliferation in the presence of p53 activation, indicating that caspase-mediated ERK2 degradation contributes to p53-induced growth arrest. These findings strongly point to ERK2 as a novel p53 target in growth suppression. © 2004 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved
- …
