1,721,037 research outputs found
A new frog species (Myobatrachidae: Uperoleia) from the Northern Deserts region of Australia, with a redescription of U. trachyderma
No full textCatullo, Renee A., Doughty, Paul, Keogh, J. Scott (2014): A new frog species (Myobatrachidae: Uperoleia) from the Northern Deserts region of Australia, with a redescription of U. trachyderma. Zootaxa 3753 (3): 251-262, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3753.3.
A new species of Australian frog (Myobatrachidae: Uperoleia) from the New South Wales mid-north coast sandplains
Get PDFClulow, Simon, Anstis, Marion, Keogh, J. Scott, Catullo, Renee A. (2016): A new species of Australian frog (Myobatrachidae: Uperoleia) from the New South Wales mid-north coast sandplains. Zootaxa 4184 (2): 285-315, DOI: http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4184.2.
FIGURE 6 in Multi-locus phylogeny and taxonomic revision of Uperoleia toadlets (Anura: Myobatrachidae) from the western arid zone of Australia, with a description of a new species
No full textFIGURE 6. Oscillographs and spectrograms of (a) U. glandulosa, U. russelli (b) long call and (c) short call, U. talpa (d) long call and (e) short call, and U. saxatilis sp. nov. (f) long call and (g) short call.Published as part of Catullo, Renee A., Doughty, Paul, Roberts, Dale & Keogh, Scott, 2011, Multi-locus phylogeny and taxonomic revision of Uperoleia toadlets (Anura: Myobatrachidae) from the western arid zone of Australia, with a description of a new species, pp. 1-43 in Zootaxa 2902 on page 13, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20183
FIGURE 2 in A new frog species (Myobatrachidae: Uperoleia) from the Northern Deserts region of Australia, with a redescription of U. trachyderma
No full textFIGURE 2. Map of the Australian Monsoonal Tropics showing the distribution of (a) nDNA groups, (b) mtDNA clades, (c) acoustic variation, and (d) total known distribution of U. stridera sp. nov (green) and U. trachyderma (yellow) based on our data and previous taxonomic descriptions. Half coloured shapes in (b) indicate locations with multiple mtDNA clades present. Arrowheads in (d) indicate type localities. In (a), major bioregions are in bold, and biogeographical barriers are in italics. In (b), dashed lines indicate major roads and dots indicate locations. Modified from Catullo et al. 2013.Published as part of Catullo, Renee A., Doughty, Paul & Keogh, J. Scott, 2014, A new frog species (Myobatrachidae: Uperoleia) from the Northern Deserts region of Australia, with a redescription of U. trachyderma, pp. 251-262 in Zootaxa 3753 (3) on page 257, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3753.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/23052
Uperoleia Gray 1841
No full textGenus Uperoleia Gray, 1841 Uperoleia Gray, 1841, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 1, 7: 90. Hyperoleia Agassiz, 1846, Nomencl. Zool., Fasc. 12: 384. Unjustified emendation. Glauertia Loveridge, 1933, Occas. Pap. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 8: 89. Type species: Glauertia russelli Loveridge, 1933, by monotypy. Synonymy by Tyler et al. 1981, Aust. J. Zool., Suppl. Ser., 29 (79): 9. Hosmeria Wells & Wellington, 1985, Aust. J. Herpetol., Suppl. Ser., 1: 2. Type species: Uperoleia marmorata laevigata Keferstein, 1867, by original designation. Synonymy by Catullo et al. 2011, Zootaxa, 2902; 1–43. Prohartia Wells & Wellington, 1985, Aust. J. Herpetol., Suppl. Ser., 1: 3. Type species: Pseudophryne fimbrianus Parker, 1926, by original designation. Synonymy by Catullo et al. 2011, Zootaxa, 2902; 1–43. Type species. U. marmorata Gray, 1841, by monotypy.Published as part of Clulow, Simon, Anstis, Marion, Keogh, J. Scott & Catullo, Renee A., 2016, A new species of Australian frog (Myobatrachidae: Uperoleia) from the New South Wales mid-north coast sandplains, pp. 285-315 in Zootaxa 4184 (2) on page 291, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4184.2.3, http://zenodo.org/record/16475
Uperoleia Gray 1841
No full textGenus Uperoleia Gray, 1841 Uperoleia Gray, 1841, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 1, 7: 90. Hyperoleia Agassiz, 1846, Nomencl. Zool., Fasc. 12: 384. Unjustified emendation. Glauertia Loveridge, 1933, Occas. Pap. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 8: 89. Type species: Glauertia russelli Loveridge, 1933, by monotypy. Synonymy by Tyler et. al. 1981, Aust. J. Zool., Suppl. Ser., 29 (79): 9. Hosmeria Wells & Wellington, 1985, Aust. J. Herpetol., Suppl. Ser., 1: 2. Type species: Uperoleia marmorata laevigata Keferstein, 1867, by original designation. Synonymy by Catullo et al. 2011, Zootaxa, 2902; 1–43. Prohartia Wells & Wellington, 1985, Aust. J. Herpetol., Suppl. Ser., 1: 3. Type species: Pseudophryne fimbrianus Parker, 1926, by original designation. Synonymy by Catullo et al. 2011, Zootaxa, 2902; 1–43. Type species— U. marmorata Gray, 1841, by monotypy.Published as part of Catullo, Renee A., Doughty, Paul & Keogh, J. Scott, 2014, A new frog species (Myobatrachidae: Uperoleia) from the Northern Deserts region of Australia, with a redescription of U. trachyderma, pp. 251-262 in Zootaxa 3753 (3) on page 255, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3753.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/23052
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Uperoleia Gray 1841
No full text<i>Uperoleia</i> Gray, 1841 <p> <i>Uperoleia</i> Gray, 1841, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 1, 7: 90.</p> <p> <i>Hyperoleia</i> Agassiz, 1846, Nomencl. Zool., Fasc. 12: 384. Unjustified emendation.</p> <p> <i>Glauertia</i> Loveridge, 1933, Occas. Pap. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., 8: 89. Type species: <i>Glauertia russelli</i> Loveridge, 1933, by monotypy. Synonymy by Tyler <i>et. al.</i> 1981, Aust. J. Zool., Suppl. Ser., 29 (79): 9.</p> <p> <i>Hosmeria</i> Wells and Wellington, 1985, Aust. J. Herpetol., Suppl. Ser., 1: 2. Type species: <i>Uperoleia marmorata laevigata</i> Keferstein, 1867, by original designation.</p> <p> <i>Prohartia</i> Wells and Wellington, 1985, Aust. J. Herpetol., Suppl. Ser., 1: 3. Type species: <i>Pseudophryne fimbrianus</i> Parker, 1926, by original designation.</p> <p> <b>Type species:</b> <i>U. marmorata</i>, by monotypy.</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> A group of small-bodied (to 41 mm) terrestrial frogs with short limbs, no webbing on fingers, first finger shorter than second, inner metatarsal tubercle not compressed, lacking vomerine teeth, covered tympana, pupil rhomboidal, parotoid, dorsolateral/inguinal and coccygeal glands usually present, males with unilobular submandibular vocal sac and unpigmented nuptial pads, aquatic reproduction with small pigmented eggs and free-swimming larvae (Tyler <i>et al.</i> 1981). Cloacal flap present, moderately fimbriated in males and strongly fimbriated in females.</p> <p> <b>Other genera in synonymy.</b> <i>Uperoleia</i> are morphologically conservative and monophyly is not in question based on morphological (Tyler <i>et al</i>., 1981) or molecular data (Read <i>et al</i>., 2001; Frost <i>et al</i>., 2006, this study). Parker (1940) indicated <i>Hyperoleia</i> was an unjustified emendation of <i>Uperoleia</i>. There are no compelling reasons to recognize further genera within this clade. Therefore we maintain the synonymy of <i>Glauertia</i> by Tyler <i>et. al.</i> (1981) and tranfer <i>Hosmeria</i> and <i>Prohartia</i> to the synonymy of <i>Uperoleia.</i></p>Published as part of <i>Catullo, Renee A., Doughty, Paul, Roberts, Dale & Keogh, Scott, 2011, Multi-locus phylogeny and taxonomic revision of Uperoleia toadlets (Anura: Myobatrachidae) from the western arid zone of Australia, with a description of a new species, pp. 1-43 in Zootaxa 2902</i> on page 15, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/201835">10.5281/zenodo.201835</a>
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
