1,720,970 research outputs found

    LSGNet: A lightweight convolutional neural network model for tomato disease identification

    No full text
    Tomatoes are among the most extensively grown and consumed crops worldwide, but tomato production can be greatly reduced due to various diseases. Plant diseases show different symptoms at different stages. In addition, there are similarities in the symptoms of different types of plant diseases, which hinder the recognition of diseases by existing deep learning models. Traditional convolutional neural network (CNN) models for disease recognition have a large number of parameters that require high computational resources. To overcome these challenges, we propose a lightweight CNN model named LSGNet (lightweight sandglass network) for tomato disease identification. The LSGNet backbone consists of the sandglass with efficient channel attention (SGECA) and the position aware circular convolution sandglass (ParcSG) modules. The SGECA module reduces the interference of complex environments and thus focuses on extracting useful feature information. The ParcSG module has a global receptive field, which provides more detailed feature information on disease recognition. The results show that the recognition accuracies are 92.37%, 94.32%, 89.64%, 92.70%, 94.43%, 90.97%, 89.42%, 92.98%, 89.58%, and 95.54% for AlexNet, ResNet50, VGG16, MobileNetV3-Large, ShuffleNetV2-1 ×, EfficientNetV2-Small, ViT-Base, MobileViT-Small, Swin-Tiny, and LSGNet. Therefore, LSGNet has higher accuracy in recognizing tomato diseases compared to other classical models. In addition, LSGNet uses 0.75 million parameters. Compared to the lightweight CNN model MobileNetV3-Large, it only has 18% of the parameters. As a whole, the advantages of LSGNet in efficiency and lightweight structure would make it a useful tool for tomato disease recognition on mobile or embedded devices.</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Improved YOLOX-Tiny network for detection of tobacco brown spot disease

    No full text
    IntroductionTobacco brown spot disease caused by Alternaria fungal species is a major threat to tobacco growth and yield. Thus, accurate and rapid detection of tobacco brown spot disease is vital for disease prevention and chemical pesticide inputs. MethodsHere, we propose an improved YOLOX-Tiny network, named YOLO-Tobacco, for the detection of tobacco brown spot disease under open-field scenarios. Aiming to excavate valuable disease features and enhance the integration of different levels of features, thereby improving the ability to detect dense disease spots at different scales, we introduced hierarchical mixed-scale units (HMUs) in the neck network for information interaction and feature refinement between channels. Furthermore, in order to enhance the detection of small disease spots and the robustness of the network, we also introduced convolutional block attention modules (CBAMs) into the neck network. ResultsAs a result, the YOLO-Tobacco network achieved an average precision (AP) of 80.56% on the test set. The AP was 3.22%, 8.99%, and 12.03% higher than that obtained by the classic lightweight detection networks YOLOX-Tiny network, YOLOv5-S network, and YOLOv4-Tiny network, respectively. In addition, the YOLO-Tobacco network also had a fast detection speed of 69 frames per second (FPS). DiscussionTherefore, the YOLO-Tobacco network satisfies both the advantages of high detection accuracy and fast detection speed. It will likely have a positive impact on early monitoring, disease control, and quality assessment in diseased tobacco plants

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore