179,556 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Biodistribution of <sup>177</sup>Lu-CHOI-3.1 in mice bearing OHS xenografts.
Biodistribution of 177Lu-labeled chimeric OI-3 IgG1 isotype antibody (CHOI-3.1) in tissues of interest in OHS xenograft-carrying nude mice. At each time point from three to six animals were used, with number of tumors ranging from five to twelve per group. Straight lines have been drawn to connect the data points. The error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean.</p
Choi Seong Jun
학위논문(박사)--아주대학교 일반대학원 :의학과,2014. 2ABSTRACT i
TABLE OF CONTENTS ii
LIST OF FIGURES iii
ABBREVIATION iv
Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION 1
Ⅱ. MATERIAL AND METHODS 7
A. In vitro experiments – apoptosis of auditory cells 7
1. Auditory cell culture 7
2. Cell viability assay 7
3. 4'6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining 8
4. Western blot analysis of caspase-3, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP), Cx26, and Cx43 8
5. Quantitative real time-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) of Cx26, Cx30, Cx31, and Cx43 9
6. Immunocytochemistry of Cx26, Cx30, Cx31, and Cx43 10
7. Scrape-loading dye transfer (SLDT) assay 10
B. Exvivo experiments - invitro organ of Corti culture 12
C. In vivo experiments 13
1. Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Test 13
2. Phalloidin staining 14
3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) 14
Ⅲ. RESULTS 16
A. In vitro experiments – apoptosis of auditory cells 16
1. Protective effects of EGB 761 on cisplatin-induced death in HEI-OC1 cells 16
2. Protective effects of EGB 761 on cisplatin-induced apoptosis 18
3. Protective effects of EGb 761 on the inhibition of GJIC by cisplatin 20
B. Ex vivo experiments - in vitro oC culture 26
C. In vivo experiments 28
1. Shift of ABR thresholds 28
2. Cochlear morphology - phalloidin staining and SEM 30
Ⅳ. DISCUSSION 32
Ⅴ. CONCLUSION 39
REFERENCES 40
국문요약 56MasterGap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) may play an important role in the hearing process. Cisplatin is an anticancer drug that causes hearing loss and Gingko biloba extracts (EGb 761) have been used as an antioxidant and enhancer for GJIC. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficiency of EGb 761 in protecting against cisplatin-induced apoptosis and disturbance of GJIC. HEI-OC1 auditory cells were cultured and treated with cisplatin (50µM) and EGb (300µg/ml) for 24 h, and then analyzed by immunocytochemistry (Annexin V/ propidium iodide) and Western blots. The function of GJIC was evaluated by scrape-loading dye transfer (SLDT). Basal turn organ of Corti (oC) explants from neonatal (p3) rats were exposed to cisplatin (1–10µM) and EGb (50–400µg/ml). The number of intact hair cells was counted by co-labeling with phalloidin and MyoVIIa. EGb prevented cisplatin-induced apoptosis in immunostaining and decreased caspase 3 and poly-ADP- ribose polymerase (PARP) bands, which were increased in cisplatin-treated cells in Western blots. EGb prevented abnormal intracellular locations of Cx 26, 30, 31, and 43 in cells treated with cisplatin and increased quantities of Cx bands. EGb also prevented cisplatin-induced disturbance of GJIC in SLDT. In oC explants, EGb significantly prevented hair cell damage induced by cisplatin. In animal studies, EGb significantly prevented cisplatin-induced hearing loss across 16 kHz and 32 kHz. These results show that cisplatin induces ototoxicity including hearing loss as well as down-regulation of GJIC and inhibition of Cxs in auditory cells. EGb prevents hearing loss in cisplatin-treated rats by inhibiting down-regulation of Cx expression and GJIC. The disturbance of GJIC or Cx expression may be one of important mechanisms of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity
Choi Sung Jun
학위논문(석사)--아주대학교 일반대학원 :의학과,2010. 2TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT ⅰ
TABLE OF CONTENTS iii
LIST OF FIGURES iv
LIST OF TABLES v
Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION 1
Ⅱ. PATIENTS AND METHODS 3
A. Study design 3
B. Patients 4
C. Stent and stent insertion 4
D. Statistics 4
Ⅲ. RESULTS 6
Ⅳ. DISCUSSION 13
REFERENCES 18
국문요약 24MasterBackground: The covered self expanding metal stent (SEMS) has become the main treatment option of malignant esophageal obstruction. However, the fully covered SEMS has not been as popular as the partially covered one for the fear of migration in spite of much advantage. So, we performed a prospective study to evaluate clinical efficacy of the fully covered SEMS.
Methods: Between October 1998 and February 2009, 100 consecutive patients with malignant esophageal obstruction who were treated with the fully covered Niti-S stent (Niti-S, Taewoong Medical, Seoul, Korea) were included. Data collected contained technical success rate of deployment and retrieval, dysphagia score changes, success rate of esophagorespiratory fistula (ERF) resolution, survival, stent patency and complications. We also conducted analyses concerning the associations between results and variables.
Result: Technical success rate of stent deployment was 100%. Dysphagia score was improved significantly from a mean of 3.1±0.8 to 1.3±0.7 (p=0.000) and 13 of 14 patients(14/100,14%) with ERF were resolved successfully with the initial stent(13/14, 92.9%). Median survival and stent patency was 74(51~97) and 54(47~67) days respectively. Recurrent dysphagia occurred in 19 patients (19/100,19%) with tumor ingrowth (2/100,2%), tumor overgrowth(7/100,7%), stent migration(6/100,6%), and food impaction(4/100,4%). Among other complications, early(≤7days) complications were chest pain (12/100, 12%), regurgitation (2/100 2%), tracheal compression (1/100, 1%) and late(>7days) ones were bleeding (2/100, 2%), persistent chest pain (2/100, 2%), and GERD (7/100, 7%). Reintervention had to be done in 19 patients (19/100,19%). Among them, endoscopic stent retrieval and replacement was done in 17 patients (17%) with 100% success rate and additional stents were inserted for the remaining two patients. There was no stent related mortality or 30 day mortality. In our analyses, there was no significant variable associated with clinical outcomes and complications.
Conclusions: The fully covered Niti-S metal stent has proved its effectiveness in palliation of malignant dysphagia and safety of endoscopic retrieval with a comparably low migration rate maintaining its good advantage of lower incidence of tumor ingrowth and overgrowth.
Key words; malignant dysphagia, fully covered SEMS, stent migration, stent retrieval
Andesipolis Whitfield & Choi, New
Andesipolis Whitfield & Choi, New Genus Type species: Andesipolis masoni Choi & Suh, n. sp. (described below). Etymology: The generic name comes from the superficial resemblance to Rhysipolis, and from the Andean distribution of the genus. Diagnosis: Antennae 27–34 segmented, slightly longer than fore wing (Fig. 26). Malar suture present (Fig.18, 23). Ocelli in equilateral triangle, occipital carina complete, remaining separate from hypostomal carina to mandibular base (Fig. 12, 23). Maxillary palps 6 (sometimes appearing 7)segmented; labial palps 3 segmented. Pronope absent. Notauli short, covering only anterior part of mesonotum (Fig 6, 13, 14), shallow and narrowly elliptical midpit present (Fig 6, 13, 14). Epicnemial carina present (Fig. 5, 16, 20). Sternaulus present as a short groove on the posterior portion of mesopleuron (Fig. 5, 16, 20. Fore wing 2 a vein present (Fig. 1 3). Hind tibia without a fringe (comb) of spines on inner side of apex, or with a very poorly developed group of spines. Propodeum with (Figs. 7, 13, 21) or without (Fig. 15) welldefined areola, but when welldefined, usually elongate with a transverse carina dividing it into anterior and posterior portions. First tergite with distinct dorsope; dorsal carinae converging posteriorly (Fig. 7, 11, 15, 21). Ovipositor sheaths long and setose (Fig. 9, 17, 22). Distribution: Chile (Neotropical). Biology: Unknown. Comments: The new genus superficially resembles some species of Rhysipolis Förster in habitus (hence the name we have given it), and in addition in many details of the mesopleuron, wing venation and metasomal tergites. Unlike Rhysipolis, the forewing (Figs. 13) has a distinctly visible vein 2 a (not common within Braconidae yet found more basally within Hymenoptera). In addition the mesonotum has a longitudinal posterior groove as in many Hormiini and Rhyssalini (perhaps represented in an often less welldemarcated form in Pseudorhysipolis Scatilini, PenteadoDias and Achterberg), while the propodeum has a “double areola” pattern of carinae resembling especially Rhyssalini (figs. 7, 13, 21). The latter character has been proposed as likely to be plesiomorphic within Braconidae (Whitfield, 1988); some Rhysipolini also have a double areola, but of a different form (Spencer & Whitfield, 1999). Unlike typical Hormiini and Rhyssalini vein mcu meets RS + M before RS splits from M (in this respect resembling Rhysipolis, Exothecini and Rogadinae). Thus, the new genus Andesipolis has a unique combination of features that make it difficult to place to tribe or subfamily. This difficulty is largely due to the tribes and subfamilies not being very well defined in the first place. Its biology is unknown, but the typically long ovipositor (Figs. 9, 17, 22) resembles that of groups that attack hosts within shelters of leaf (Rhysipolis Shaw, 1983; Whitfield, 1992; Spencer & Whitfield, 1999) or stem tissue (Doryctine Marsh, 1997, or plant galls (Hydrangeocolini Oda et al., 2001; Belshaw et al., 2003). Andesipolis masoni Choi & Suh, n. sp. (Fig. 1, 4– 9) Female. Body length 2.6–2.9 mm; forewing length 3.5 mm. Head 1.1–1.2 X wider than mesoscutum. Face 1.6 X as broad at midheight as long medially, smooth and polished with scattered setae. Clypeus 2.6 X as broad as its height. Malar space 0.4 X eye height in frontal view. Eyes 1.2–1.3 X higher than width; eyes 1.6– 1.8 X longer than temple in lateral view. Vertex smooth and polished, with scattered setae. Occipital and hypostomal carinae remaining separate to mandibular base. Antennae slightly longer than forewing; 27–29 segmented. Maxillary and labial palps 6 and 3 segmented respectively. Mesosoma 1.8 1.9 X longer than high; 2.2–2.3 X longer than width between tegulae. Pronotum rugose dorsally; mostly polished laterally. Mesonotum weakly punctate with scattered setae; Notauli short, presenting only anterior onethird of mesonotum; midpit shallow and long, 0.4 0.6 X as long as mesonotum. Scutellum 1.2 X as long as width, smooth to weakly punctate and polished; scutellar sulcus 0.3 X as long as width. Propodeum with roughly pentagonal shape areola and distinct areolar crossbridge with irregular ridges arising inside of areola; median carina present; with irregular ridges around median carina and transverse carinae; polished anteriorlaterally. Hind coxa 2.0X as long as width, slightly shorter than first abdominal tergum, smooth and polished; hind tibial spur short, 0.24 X as long as basitarsus; hind tarsal claw simple. Wing Forewing: Stigma about 4.3 X longer than broad; vein r arising from middle of stigma; Vein r 0.5 X as long as vein 3 RSa. Vein 2 RS 0.8 X as long as vein 3 RSa. Vein 3 RSa 0.5 X as long as vein 3 RSb. Vein rm spectral, 0.6 X as long as vein 3 RSa. Vein 1 CUb 1.9 X as long as vein 1 CUa. Vein (RS+M)b present, short and spectral. Vein 1 1 AC 0.4 X as long as vein 2 1 A. Hindwing: Vein M+CU 1.9 X as long as vein 1 M. Vein cua 0.5 X as long as vein 1 M, slightly curved. Vein rm 0.6 X as long as vein 1 M. Metasoma Length of tergite I 0.8 X its apical width, distinctly sclerotized, reticulaterugose except granulate posteriordorsolateral portion; dorsal carinae converging but not jointed; dorsope rather large and deep. Tergite II and III smooth to granulate and polished, tergite II 1.9 X as long as tergite III. Hypopigium small. Ovipositor 0.8–0.9 X shorter than hind tibia, straight; ovipositor sheath 0.6 X shorter than ovipositor. Color Body generally orangebrown or brown; maxillary and labial palps pale yellow; antenna brown; mesosoma yellowish brown except brown scutellar sulcus; propodeum brown; legs orangebrown to brown. Male Unknown. Biology Unknown. Diagnosis This species can be distinguished from other Andesipolis species by the relatively short and straight ovipositor (the ovipositor is always shorter than the hind tibia). Material examined. Holotype. Female: Chile: Carelmapu, Llonquihue, 21–28.ii. 1957, L. E. Pena (CNC) Paratypes: 1 female, Chile: Pucotrihue, Valdivia, 11–13.iii. 1955, L. E. Pena (CNC); 1 female, Chepu, I. De Chiloé, 3.ii. 1952, Peña (CNC). Etymology. This species is named for the late W.R. M. Mason, who contributed a great deal to this work, as detailed above.Published as part of Whitfield, James B., Choi, Won-Young & Suh, Kyong-In, 2004, Andesipolis, a puzzling new genus of cyclostome Braconidae (Hymenoptera) from the Chilean Andes, with descriptions of three new species, pp. 1-15 in Zootaxa 438 on pages 3-5, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15724
Filmmaking on the Edge: Director Shin Sang-ok and Actress Choi Eun-hee
Two Korean cinematographers, the late director and producer Shin Sang-ok (1926-2006) and his wife the actress Choi Eun-hee (b. 1926) are considered legends in Korea, and well beyond. Both of them became rare figures in film history, destined to be as much renowned for their life as for their work
Andesipolis framea Whitfield & Choi, n. sp.
Andesipolis framea Whitfield & Choi, n. sp. (Fig. 3, 20– 25) Female. Body length 2.2–2.9 mm; forewing length 3.0– 3.9 mm. Head 1.1 X wider than mesoscutum. Face 1.9 X as broad at midheight as long medially, smooth and polished with scattered setae. Clypeus 2.4 X as broad as its height. Malar space 0.4 X eye height in frontal view. Eyes 1.2–1.3 X higher than width; eyes 1.7–1.8 X longer than temple in lateral view. Vertex smooth and polished with scattered setae. Occipital and hypostomal carinae remaining separate to mandibular base. Antennae slightly longer than forewing; 27–30 segmented. Maxillary and labial palps 6 and 3 segmented respectively. Mesosoma 1.8 1.9 X longer than high. Pronotum rugose dorsally; mostly polished laterally. Mesonotum 0.9 X longer than width between tegulae, weakly punctate with scattered setae; notauli short, presenting only anterior onethird of mesonotum; midpit shallow and long, 0.5 X as long as mesonotum. Scutellum 1.1 X as long as width, smooth and polished; scutellar sulcus 0.3 X as long as width. Propodeum with roughly pentagonal shape areola and distinct areolar crossbridge with irregular ridges arising inside of areola; median carina present; with short irregular ridges around median carina and transverse carinae; polished anteriorlaterally. Hind coxa 1.6 X as long as width, slightly shorter than first abdominal tergum, smooth and polished; hind tibial spur short, 0.3 X as long as basitarsus; hind tarsal claw simple. Wing Forewing: Stigma about 2.4 X longer than broad; vein r arising from middle of stigma; Vein r 0.4 X as long as vein 3 RSa. Vein 2 RS 0.9 X as long as vein 3 RSa. Vein 3 RSa 0.4 X as long as vein 3 RSb. Vein rm spectral, 0.5 X as long as vein 3 RSa. Vein 1 CUb 2.0X as long as vein 1 CUa. Vein (RS+M)b present, short and spectral. Vein 1 1 AC 0.4 X as long as vein 2 1 A. Hindwing: Vein M+CU 1.9 X as long as vein 1 M. Vein cua 0.5 X as long as vein 1 M, slightly curved. Vein rm 0.6 X as long as vein 1 M. Metasoma Length of tergite I 1.1 X its apical width, distinctly sclerotized, strongly convex dorsally, reticulaterugose to striate; dorsal carinae converging but not jointed; dorsope rather large and deep. Tergite II and III smooth to granulate and polished, tergite II 1.6 X as long as tergite III. Hypopigium small. Ovipositor 1.0– 1.2 X longer than hind tibia, straight; ovipositor sheath 0.5 0.6 X shorter than ovipositor. Color Body generally brown to dark brown; maxillary and labial palps pale yellow; antenna brown except dark brown scape and pedicel; mesonotum brown except dark brown notauli; scutellum, metanotum, propodeum, tergite I, anterior 1 / 3 of tergite II, Tergite IV to VIII, and ovipositor sheath dark brown; legs generally yellowish brown; hind tibia pale yellow except dark brown apex. Male Unknown. Biology Unknown. Diagnosis This species is similar to Andesipolis masoni in its straight ovipositor and presence of pentagonal areola and distinct areolar crossbridge (forming a “double areola”) on the propodeum, but differs from A. masoni in its relatively longer ovipositor and maculate forewing. Material examined. Holotype female: Chile: Carelmapu, Llonquihue, 21–28.ii. 1957, L. E. Pena (CNC). Paratype: 4 females, same data as holotype (CNC). Etymology. “ Framea ” is a littleknown Latin word that refers to long spears carried by the Germans of their day. We use this name in reference to the spearlike ovipositor.Published as part of Whitfield, James B., Choi, Won-Young & Suh, Kyong-In, 2004, Andesipolis, a puzzling new genus of cyclostome Braconidae (Hymenoptera) from the Chilean Andes, with descriptions of three new species, pp. 1-15 in Zootaxa 438 on pages 6-7, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15724
Pragmatic Case Studies as a Source of Unity in Applied Psychology
To unify or not to unify applied psychology: that is the question. In this article we review pendulum swings in the historical efforts to answer this question—from a comprehensive, positivist, “top-down,” deductive yes between the 1930s and the early 60s, to a postmodern no since then. A rationale and proposal for a limited, “bottom-up,” inductive yes in applied psychology is then presented, employing a case-based paradigm that integrates both positivist and postmodern themes and components. This paradigm is labeled “pragmatic psychology” and, its specific use of case studies, the “Pragmatic Case Study Method” (“PCS Method”). We call for the creation of peer-reviewed journal-databases of pragmatic case studies as a foundational source of unifying applied knowledge in our discipline. As one example, the potential of the PCS Method for unifying different angles of theoretical regard is illustrated in an area of applied psychology, psychotherapy, via the case of Mrs. B. The article then turns to the broader historical and epistemological arguments for the unifying nature of the PCS Method in both applied and basic psychology.Peer reviewe
Venturia tenuiabdominalis Choi 2022, sp. nov.
<i>Venturia tenuiabdominalis</i> Choi sp. nov. (Fig. 1) <p>ḦĿHfflŪÑIJşḏnjffi (ṵḋ)</p> <p>https://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:652F061E-4F9B-4BE5-AD6A-024FD1FC8804</p> <p> <b>Description</b> (female holotype).</p> <p>Female. Fore wing 3.9 mm (3.8-4.5 mm), body 7.2 mm (6.5-8.5 mm), ovipositor 2.0 mm (1.6-2.0 mm) long.</p> <p> Color. Head black; mandible, palpi, and antenna brown; tegula dark brown; fore and mid legs brown; hind coxa brown, darkened basally; hind tibia brown, darkened basally and apically; petiole and 2 nd tergite black; the rest parts of tergites brown, darkened dorsally; ovipositor reddish brown; ovipositor sheath black.</p> <p>Head: Face convex, densely granulated, distance between margin of antennal socket and clypeal margin 1.08 times as long as distance between of minimum length of inner orbits. Clypeus not separated from face. Malar space 0.5 times as long as basal width of mandible. Lower tooth of mandible as long as upper one. Frons and temple densely granulated. Vertex slightly granulated. Occipital carina weak but complete, concave in dorsal view. Temple 0.7 times as wide as transversal diameter of eye in lateral view. Distance between lateral ocellus and eye 1.3 times as long as ocellus maximum diameter. Antenna with 31 flagellomeres (27-31 flagellomeres). First flagellomere 4.4-4.5 times as long as wide, basal flagellomeres elongated and apical flagellomeres square.</p> <p> Mesosoma: Elongated. Pronotum slightly granulated with numerous striae centrally; epomia present. Mesoscutum roughly and densely granulated; without notaulus. Mesopleuron regularly punctate; speculum weak convex and glabrous. In front of speculum with transversal striae and mesopleural pit weak. Epicnemial carina complete and sternaulus weak. Mesoscutellum convex, without lateral carina. Metapleuron densely granulated. Propodeum elongated, well developed median longitudinal carinae and with transversal wrinkles, surface granulated. Propodeum reaching at the apical hind coxa. Propodeal spiracle very small and round, not reaching pleural carina. Submetapleural carina present. Legs slender and thin. Trochanter longer than trochantellus. Hind tarsi ratio is 16: 7: 5: 3: 4. Tarsal claw simple. Fore wing without areolet, vein 1 st intercubitus longer than cubitus. Nervulus vein distad to basal vein. Hind wing with four distal hamuli. Nervellus intercepted lower 0.3; discoidella investigial.</p> <p> Metasoma: Elongated. Petiole smooth, lateral carina present, lateral pit and glymma absent. Basal area of 2 nd sternite with transversal wrinkles. Tergites smooth and glabrous. Margins of tergites 3-7 round in lateral view and concave in dorsal view. Ovipositor thick and upcurved with notch of upper valve, longer than hind tibia. Ovipositor sheath thin.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p> <b>Material examined.</b> [South Korea] (TD: DNUE_IIEI): Holotype: , ditto, 28.vii-13.viii.2006, J.W. Lee; 2, ditto, 6-18.viii.2009, S.H. Oh; 1 , CN, Gyeryong-si, Sindoan-myeon, Buam-ri, Mt. Gyeryongsan National Park, Sutonggol, 17.v-29. viii.2012, J.W. Lee; 2, GG, Gapyeong-gun, Cheongpyeong-myeon, Goseong-ri, Mt. Homyeongsan (Malaise trap), 16-30.vii.2009, J.O. Lim; 1 $, GN, Hamyang-gun, Macheon-myeon, Meokjeon-ri, Baekmu-dong, Mt. Jirisan National Park, 14.vii-11.x.2011, J.C. Jeong.</p> <p> <b>Host.</b> Unknown.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> South Korea.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> Name originates from the Latin “tenuis”, <i>tenuiabdominalis</i> meaning “slender abdominalis”.</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> It is similar to <i>Venturia ocypeta</i> (Gauld, 1984), but divers by ovipositor longer than hind tibia (ovipositor shorter than hind tibia in <i>V. ocypeta</i>); hind tibia brown and darkened apically and basally (hind tibia entirely brown to dark brown in <i>V. ocypeta</i>); nervellus intercepted lower 0.3 (nervellus not intercepted but curved in <i>V. ocypeta</i>); antennal flagellomeres and body length longer than <i>V. ocypeta</i> (27-31 flagellomeres in <i>V</i>. <i>tenuiabdominalis</i> sp. nov. but 21-23 flagellomeres in <i>V. ocypeta</i>).</p>Published as part of <i>Choi, Jin-Kyung, 2022, Description of a new species of the genus Venturia Schrottky (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Campopleginae) from South Korea, pp. 128-131 in Journal of Species Research 11 (2)</i> on pages 129-130, DOI: 10.12651/JSR.2022.11.2.128, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8120099">http://zenodo.org/record/8120099</a>
- …
