1,720,959 research outputs found
Long-term results of combined 1-way phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and trabeculectomy.
No full textPURPOSE: To analyze the results of 1-way phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation combined with trabeculectomy.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology and Neurosurgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 42 eyes of 36 patients with glaucoma and cataract who had phacoemulsification with posterior chamber IOL implantation combined with trabeculectomy. The mean follow-up of 28.24 months +/- 10.99 (SD) (range 11 to 52 months) included measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity, visual field, endothelial cell loss, and notation of complications.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant postoperative improvement in visual acuity (P < .001). Mean preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/200 (range 20/30 to hand movements). Mean 1 year postoperative BCVA was 20/30 (range 20/20 to 20/60). The preoperative mean IOP of 24.06 mm Hg decreased to 15.36 mm Hg at 1 year (P < .001). All 42 eyes had a postoperative IOP of less than 21.00 mm Hg. Mean central cornea endothelial cell density preoperatively was 2238 +/- 396 cells/mm2 (range 1697 to 2906 cells/mm2) and postoperatively, 2005 +/- 397 cells/mm2 (range 1302 to 2801 cells/mm2). Early postoperative complications consisted of a choroidal detachment in 2 patients (4.76%). Three and 4 days after surgery, respectively, 2 patients (4.76%) had surgery to remove viscoelastic substance under the IOL. Late complications included posterior synechias in 3 eyes (7.14%). One year after surgery, because of a significant decrease in vision, a neodymium:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy was necessary in 2 eyes, 1 with an acrylic IOL (3.70%) and 1 with a silicone lens (9.09%).
CONCLUSION: Combined phacoemulsification, posterior chamber IOL implantation, and trabeculectomy was safe and effective in patients with coexisting glaucoma and cataract
Contrast sensitivity evaluation of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses 2 years after implantation.
No full textPURPOSE: To compare the quality of vision with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses (IOLs) in pseudophakic patients after long-term follow-up.
METHODS: Two hundred eyes of 100 patients with bilateral cataracts were randomly assigned to receive spherical (Acrysof SN60AT [Alcon Laboratories Inc] or Sensar AR40e [Advanced Medical Optics Inc]) or aspheric IOLs (Acrysof SN60WF [Alcon] or Tecnis Z9000 [Advanced Medical Optics]). Ophthalmologic examination, including best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), pupil size, ocular dominance, contrast sensitivity under mesopic and photopic conditions, and wavefront analysis, was performed 2 months and 1 and 2 years after surgery.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences among the four groups in terms of age, pupil diameter, postoperative BSCVA, comeal spherical aberration, and posterior capsular opacification were noted. At all followup examinations, contrast sensitivity results showed no significant differences between the two aspheric IOLs at all spatial frequencies. Under photopic conditions, significant differences (P<.05) between spherical and aspheric IOLs were detected for spatial frequencies of 12 and 18 cycles per degree (cpd) at 2 months and 2 years and 12 cpd at 1 year. Under mesopic conditions, significant differences (P<.05) were detected between spherical and aspheric IOLs for all spatial frequencies at 2 months; all spatial frequencies except 18 cpd at 1 year; and spatial frequencies of 3, 12, and 18 cpd at 2 years. In addition, aspheric IOLs had statistical reductions in total spherical aberration at all follow-up examinations (P<.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that implantation of a modified aspheric IOL improves functional visual performance at 2 years postoperativ
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Effetti collaterali della radioterapia sul bulbo e sull'orbita
No full textDottorato di ricerca in patologia tumorale oculare e dell'orbita. 11. ciclo. A.a. 1998-99. Coordinatore Renato Frezzotti. Tutore Theodora HadijstilianouConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche - Biblioteca Centrale - P.le Aldo Moro, 7, Rome; Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale - P.za Cavalleggeri, 1, Florence / CNR - Consiglio Nazionale delle RichercheSIGLEITItal
- …
