1,721,015 research outputs found
Human basophil releasability. VI. Changes in basophil releasability in patients with allergic rhinitis or bronchial asthma.
No full text
Fragments of truth: T-cell targets of polyclonal immunoglobulins in autoimmune diseases
No full textThe expanding therapeutic use of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in autoimmune diseases has raised important practical and conceptual issues over the last few years. These have prompted a number of research efforts aimed at characterizing aspects of the mechanism of action of current IVIg preparations, which might lead to the development of standardized, more cost-effective agents. Although polyclonal IgG in these preparations are mostly thought to act via direct interference with disease-specific, pathogenic autoantibodies, evidence from clinical and experimental work points to the involvement of crucial checkpoints upstream of self-reactive B-cell activation and autoantibody production. Reviewed herein are the results of the most recent studies documenting the crucial role of regulatory T cells (Treg) in the immunomodulatory activity of IVIg, and the molecular mechanisms mediating the effect of specific IgG fragments and glycoforms on Treg activity and the ensuing downregulation of T-cell effector responses of different sign and magnitude. Further progress in this area of translational research may lead to the development of innovative strategies aimed at restoring tolerance in autoimmune diseases. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
