1,721,260 research outputs found

    Australia under construction: nation-building past, present and future

    No full text
    The Australian nation is a work in progress. So conclude the authors whose views are represented in this most recent offering in the ANZSOG monograph series. From its beginnings as a settler society through to present day concerns about ‘broadbanding the nation’, the nation-building narrative has resonated with Australians. The very idea of nation-building has both excited the popular imagination about what we might achieve as a society and a nation, and has occasioned despair about missed opportunities. The eleven authors contributing to this monograph reflect on these, and other themes from a variety of perspectives. They challenge our understanding of the term ‘nation-building’, reflect on its contemporary relevance as a framework for public policy and even re-appraise the contribution of past ‘iconic’ nation-building endeavours. To this subject the authors bring intelligence, wit and a healthy disdain for sacred cows. A stimulating read for anyone interested in the history, challenges and prospects of nation-building in Australia

    Partitioned general linear methods for separable Hamiltonian problems

    No full text
    Partitioned general linear methods possessing the G-symplecticity property are introduced. These are intended for the numerical solution of separable Hamiltonian problems and, as for multivalue methods in general, there is a potential for loss of accuracy because of parasitic solution growth. The solution of mechanical problems over extended time intervals often benefits from interchange symmetry as well as from symplectic behaviour. A special type of symmetry, known as interchange symmetry, is developed from a model Runge–Kutta case to a full multivalue case. Criteria are found for eliminating parasitic behaviour and order conditions are explored

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore