262,897 research outputs found
Cerámica Buga: reevaluación
No full textEl término cerámica Buga fue utilizado por primera vez en un informe preliminar de la investigación llevada a cabo en el Valle del Cauca durante 1964 (Bray y Moseley, 1971). La mayoría del material encontrado ese año pudo ser asignado sin dificultad, bien a la fase Yotoco (1er. milenio D.C.) o a la subsiguiente fase Sonso (c. siglo 12 hasta la Conquista), pero hubo un grupo de vasijas que no encajó fácilmente en esta secuencia. A esta cerámica anómala se le dio el nombre de cerámica Buga. Se incluían varios ajuares de tumbas obtenidos en el valle del Cauca y en la cordillera Central, pero este tipo de alfarería aparentemente no se presentó en nuestras excavaciones en sitios de habitación, aunque, hay que admitirlo, es notablemente difícil de reconocer a partir de tiestos únicamente. Algunos elementos decorativos sugerían que la cerámica Buga estaba relacionada de alguna manera con la Sonso, pero en ausencia de material fechado obtenido en excavaciones controladas, la naturaleza de la relación era poco clara. Como medida provisional, la cerámica Buga se colocó en una categoría aparte, con la esperanza de que futuras investigaciones resolverían el problema de su edad y filiación cultural. Tuvimos cuidado en 1971 de no referirnos ni a una "cultura Buga" ni a una "fase Buga".
 
Buga<T dalam Perspektif Alquran
No full textPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan mengkaji ayat-ayat yang
berkaitan dengan Buga>t , serta pengaruh dan konsekwensinya dalam kehidupan
masyarakat, terutama atas reaktualisasi makna-maknanya sesuai dengan kondisi zaman
saat ini serta untuk menyelamatkan manusia dari kerusakan para pelaku Buga>t .
Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan maudhu’i , dan pengumpulan datanya
diperoleh melalui kajian library research (kajian pustaka), baik data primer maupun data
sekunder. Data primer diambil dari Ayat-ayat Alquran dan tafsirnya, dan data sekunder
diperoleh melalui kitab-kitab serta hasil penelitian yang berkaitan dengan pembahasan
Buga>t .
Dalam penelitian ayat-ayat Buga>t ini ditemukan bahwa kata Bugha>t di dalam
Alquran menunjukkan kepada pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan-ketentuan Allah
sebagaimana makna umumnya yang berarti kezaliman, kesombongan, dan kesewenang-
wenangan. Sifat-sifat yang seperti ini terkadang digambarkan oleh Alquran sebagai sifat
individu, terkadang pula sebagai sifat kaum/kelompok.
Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa para ulama berbeda dalam menjelaskan
objek dari Ayat Buga>t yang menjadi pokok bahasan dalam penelitian ini, yakni QS. Al-
BUGA<T DALAM PERSPEKTIF ALQURAN
ABSTRAK
RUDI ISWADI
H{ujurat ayat 9, perbedaan ini terjadi karena perbedaan latar belakang keilmuan antara
Fuqaha>, Mutakallimi>n, Mutas}awwifi>n , dan Mufassiri>n . Buga>t menurut perspektif hukum
Islam adalah diperangi dan dijatuhi hukuman mati (jarimah hudud) , hal ini sesuai dengan
apa yang telah disebutkan oleh para fuqaha>. Term Buga>t tidak terdapat dalam hukum
positif di Indonesia, namun istilah yang mirip adalah makar. Menurut perspektif hukum
positif pelaku makar dihukum dengan pidana mati dan pidana penjara, hal ini sesuai
dengan apa yang dirumuskan dalam Buku II Bab I KUHP yaitu dalam Pasal 104, Pasal 106, Pasal 107, dan ditambah dengan Pasal 108 KUHP.
Ayat Alquran ketika berbicara masalah Buga>t tidak hanya terbatas pada
masalah politik saja, tetapi masalah sosial kemasyarakatan, hukum, bahkan dapat
berlaku pada seluruh aspek. Hal ini membuktikan bahwa lingkup Buga>t sangat luas dan
perlu menjadi perhatian agar tidak terjadi konflik sosial ditengah masyarakat
RV1-067A270208 - Personal details Nelson Buga
No full textI am interviewing Buga, trying to elicit as many personal details as possible.. Language as given: Blanga, Pijin, and Englis
BUGA exhibitions – approach to building the Polish landscape
No full textWystawy ogrodnicze BUGA w Niemczech, w tym ich międzynarodowe edycje IGS, ale także podobne imprezy regionalne LAGA są przedsięwzięciami, które tworzą wizerunek współczesnych europejskich trendów w kształtowaniu krajobrazu. Prowadzą one działalność wielokierunkową, u której podstaw leży kształtowanie wizji współczesnego krajobrazu polegające na budowaniu świadomości krajobrazowej, wzorców edukacji i fizycznym tworzeniu nowych elementów i kompozycji krajobrazowych. Przeniesienie doświadczeń wystaw ogrodniczych BUGA na grunt polski pozwoliłoby na budowanie polskiego krajobrazu według najnowszych standardów.BUGA – Federal Garden Show, IGS – International Garden Show and LAGA – Regional Garden Show in Germany are projects which create the image of contemporary European trends in shaping landscape. They conduct multi-directorial activity that consists in building landscape awareness, a model of education and the real creation of new landscape elements and compositions. Shaping the vision of contemporary landscape underlies this activity. Transplanting BUGA experience into the Polish soil would allow for building the Polish landscape according to the latest standards
RV1-058A270208 - Positional Verbs (I) - Hughu and Buga
No full textUnder my supervision, Wifred Hughu is trying to elicit positional verbs from Nelson Buga,using the MPI visual stimuli.. Language as given: Blang
Aphis khrulevi Stekolshchikov & Buga 2018, sp. nov.
No full text<i>Aphis khrulevi</i> sp. nov. <p>(Figs. 10–19, Tabl. 2–3)</p> <p> Eleven fundatrices and 17 apterous viviparous females of this species were collected by G.Ch. Shaposhnikov on 1.vi.1962 from <i>Veronica longifolia</i> L. in the Polar–Alpine Botanical Garden of Kirovsk (Murmansk province). Four fundatrices of this species were collected by O.A. Khruleva on 2.vii.2010 from <i>Veronica longifolia</i> in the Eastern Taimyr and a slide with 2 fundatrices of the same species collected by A.V. Ermolenko on 29.vii.1964, apparently from <i>Veronica</i> on Taimyr in the vicinity of Norilsk was received by us from the collection of O.I. Ivanovskaya (Siberian Zoological Museum of the Institute of Animal Systematics and Ecology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia—SZM ISEA SB RAS). All these materials formed the basis of the description of this new species.</p> <p> <b>Type material.</b> <i>Holotype</i>: apterous viviparous female, No. 5003 (collection number of ZIN RAS), slide No. 8, <i>“ Aphis khrulevi</i> <b>sp. nov.</b>, Murmansk province, Kirovsk, Polar–Alpine Botanical Garden, <i>Veronica longifolia</i> L., 18.vii.1962, on lower side of rolled leaves, coll. G.Ch. Shaposhnikov ”. <i>Paratypes</i>: 11 fund. and 16 apt., No. 5003 (collection number of ZIN RAS), from the same host plant, locality and the same data as holotype; 2 fund., No. 3515 (collection number of SZM ISEA SB RAS), <i>Veronica</i> ?, Krasnoyarsk Krai, Taymyrsky Dolgano–Nenetsky District, Norilsk (nearby Talnakh), 29.vii.1964; 4 fund., No. 10899 (collection number of ZIN RAS), <i>Veronica longifolia</i> L., Krasnoyarsk Krai, Taymyrsky Dolgano–Nenetsky District, the lower course of the Kotuy River, 2.vii.2010. Holotype is deposited at ZIN RAS; paratypes are deposited at collections of ZIN RAS, NHM, MNHN, and SZM ISEA SB RAS.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> New species is named in honor of Russian entomologist Olga Arturovna Khruleva (A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Moskow) collected fundatrices of this species in the Eastern Taimyr.</p> <p> <b>Description. Fundatrix.</b> Body broadly elliptical, 1.5–1.7 (1.6) times as long as its width. Numbers of marginal setae 0–2, 0–3, 1–4, 1–3, 1–4, 2–6 and 1–2 on each side of abdominal segments I–VII, respectively. Head with epicranial suture. Antennae 6-segmented, or 5-segmented as a result of fusing of 3rd and 4th segments. Chaetotaxy of first tarsal segments 2, 2, 2 on most specimens, but some specimens with 3, 2, 2 or 3, 3, 2. Arms of mesosternal furca separated. Siphunculi weakly widened at base. Cauda elongate triangular.</p> Setae number on on abdominal number on length / articular diameter of 3rd antennal segment 1.60 <i>–</i> 3.13 (2.16 <i>–</i> 2.49) 2.11 <i>–</i> 2.60 (2.37) marginal length 46 <i>–</i> 63 (52 <i>–</i> 61) 58 <i>–</i> 76 (66) length / articular diameter of 3rd antennal segment 2.00 <i>–</i> 2.94 (2.26 <i>–</i> 2.71) 2.30 <i>–</i> 3.05 (2.64) ventral length 43 <i>–</i> 63 (51 <i>–</i> 61) 51 <i>–</i> 66 (58) length / articular diameter of 3rd antennal segment 1.70 <i>–</i> 2.94 (2.16 <i>–</i> 2.71) 2.00 <i>–</i> 2.60 (2.34) tergite VI between siphunculi 1 <i>–</i> 6 (2.0 <i>–</i> 3.4) 2 <i>–</i> 6 (2.7) number 3 <i>–</i> 8 (4.0 <i>–</i> 6.0) 4 <i>–</i> 6 (4.2) length 51 <i>–</i> 71 (59) 56 <i>–</i> 71 (64) length / articular diameter of 3rd antennal segment 2.10 <i>–</i> 3.07 (2.43 <i>–</i> 2.91) 2.20 <i>–</i> 3.00 (2.59) on anterior half 2 <i>–</i> 9 (4.0 <i>–</i> 7.0) 2 <i>–</i> 3 (2.2) along the hind margin 9 <i>–</i> 19 (13.4 <i>–</i> 16.0) 9 <i>–</i> 18 (13.4) Last antennal segmentlength of base 94 <i>–</i> 114 (110) 109 <i>–</i> 129 (121) length of processus terminalis 169 <i>–</i> 228 (184 <i>–</i> 214) 243 <i>–</i> 293 (267) length of processsus terminalis / length of base 1.55 <i>–</i> 2.14 (1.66 <i>–</i> 1.95) 1.96 <i>–</i> 2.58 (2.21) Ultimate rostral segmentnumber of accessory setae 1 <i>–</i> 4 (2.5 <i>–</i> 3.5) 2 <i>–</i> 4 (2.5) length 116 <i>–</i> 129 (119 <i>–</i> 128) 124 <i>–</i> 139 (130) length / head width across the compound eyes 0.24 <i>–</i> 0.28 (0.26) 0.26 <i>–</i> 0.32 (0.28) length of 2nd segment of hind tarsus 0.96 <i>–</i> 1.15 (0.99 <i>–</i> 1.09) 0.91 <i>–</i> 1.19 (0.98) length of base of last antennal segment 1.07 <i>–</i> 1.27 (1.06 <i>–</i> 1.14) 0.98 <i>–</i> 1.16 (1.07) 2nd segment of hind tarsuslength 104 <i>–</i> 132 (110 <i>–</i> 125) 106 <i>–</i> 144 (132) length / maximum width 4.32 <i>–</i> 5.76 (4.63 <i>–</i> 4.92) 4.20 <i>–</i> 5.70 (5.13) head width across the compound eyes 0.22 <i>–</i> 0.28 (0.23 <i>–</i> 0.27) 0.23 <i>–</i> 0.31 (0.29) length of base of last antennal segment 0.91 <i>–</i> 1.18 (0.97 <i>–</i> 1.14) 0.88 <i>–</i> 1.22 (1.10) Siphunculuslength 172 <i>–</i> 255 (207 <i>–</i> 240) 304 <i>–</i> 405 (358) length / length of body 0.08 <i>–</i> 0.11 (0.09) 0.15 <i>–</i> 0.19 (0.16) length / width of siphunculus at base 2.06 <i>–</i> 3.63 (2.28 <i>–</i> 2.67) 2.65 <i>–</i> 4.69 (3.18) length / width of siphunculus at half length 2.80 <i>–</i> 4.58 (3.46 <i>–</i> 3.86) 4.35 <i>–</i> 6.37 (5.44) length / length of 3rd antennal segment 0.50 <i>–</i> 1.16 (0.57 <i>–</i> 0.95) 0.90 <i>–</i> 1.22 (1.08) Caudalength 137 <i>–</i> 177 (152 <i>–</i> 177) 167 <i>–</i> 220 (189) length / basal width 0.88 <i>–</i> 1.21 (1.00) 0.92 <i>–</i> 1.61 (1.32) number of setae 9 <i>–</i> 15 (9.5 <i>–</i> 11.4) 7 <i>–</i> 14 (10.9) Length of siphunculus / length of cauda 1.13 <i>–</i> 1.65 (1.26 <i>–</i> 1.37) 1.58 <i>–</i> 2.29 (1.89) abdominal tergite VIII subgenital plate <p> <b>Apterous viviparous female.</b> Body broadly elliptical, 1.6–1.8 (1.7) times as long as its width. The living specimens black with dark siphunculi and cauda. Cleared specimens with dark brown head, 1st and 2nd antennal segments, coxae, trochanters and femora of all legs, peritremes on abdomen, siphunculi, anal plate and cauda; with brown two last segments of rostrum, apices of tibiae, sclerites and bands on thorax and abdomen, and subgenital plate. Thorax with large sclerotized bands on pro- and mesonotum (band on mesonotum sometimes almost interrupted in the midline), small separate sclerites on metanotum and large marginal sclerites on all segments; abdomen with thin band on abdominal tergite VIII, small marginal sclerites on abdominal segments I–IV and VI, and peritermes on all segments. Surface of head smooth, slightly wrinkled, on occiput, dorsal sides of thorax and abdominal tergites I–VI reticulate, contour of cells consists from very large fused rounded spinules forming high “wall” around the cell; the reticulation on thorax is well marked, on abdominal tergites I–VI contours of cells are indistinct; surface of abdominal tergite VII with the long rows of small pointed spinules, which on tergites VIII partially fuse to form scales; surface of ventral side of thorax faintly (contours of reticulations formed by rare small pointed spinules), of ventral side of abdomen with long rows of small pointed spinules sometimes forming strongly stretched reticulate cells. Setae on dorsal and ventral sides of thorax and abdomen finely pointed; on abdominal tergites I–IV 2–3 (2.1) spinal setae; numbers of marginal setae 0–2, 2–4, 2–4, 2–4, 1–3, 1–4 and 1–4 on each side of abdominal segments I–VII, respectively. Marginal and spinal tubercles absent on all segments of body. Head with epicranial coronal suture or with traces of epicranial coronal suture. Frontal tubercles distinct, relatively high, median tubercle protuberant, from semicircular to almost rectangular. Setae on head finely pointed. Antennae 6- segmented, 1st antennal segment slightly wrinkled, almost smooth, 2nd segment and proximal half of 3rd segment with rare small scales, distal half of 3rd and 4th–6th segments with large scales. Antenna without secondary rhinaria. Setae on antennae pointed or finely pointed. Rostrum reaching mesothorax. Ultimate rostral segment elongate wedge-shaped with straight or slightly concave sides, 1.86–2.60 (2.20) times as long as its basal width. Legs normal, setae on coxae, trochanters, femora and outer side of tibia finely pointed, on inner side of tibia pointed, on tarsi pointed or finely pointed. Chaetotaxy of first tarsal segments 3, 3, 2 on most specimens, only some specimens with 2 setae on one or two middle legs. Arms of mesosternal furca connected by wide base. Spiracles reniform. Siphunculi cylindrical, narrowing towards apex, distinctly widened at base, distinctly imbricate (covered with sparse short rows of pointed spines which are partially fused and form scales) and with very small flange. Subgenital plate oval, setae on subgenital and anal plate finely pointed. Cauda elongate triangular or triangular finger-shaped with rounded apex and long finely pointed setae.</p> <p> <b>Measurements of holotype.</b> Body—2299×1360; antenna—1320: III—349×33 (in the middle), IV—200, V— 197, VI—129+276; hind femur—584, hind tibia—1025; siphunculus—372×61 (in the middle); cauda—220×137 (at base) × 104 (before base). For more biometric data see Table 3.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Russia: Murmansk province and Krasnoyarsk Krai, but probably the species has a wider distribution in subarctic zone of Eurasia. It is very likely that this species inhabits the territory between the Kola Peninsula and Taimyr.</p> <p> <b>Biology.</b> Monoecious, holocyclic. A colony of this species consisted of fundatrices and apterous viviparous females was found on 18 July 1962, on undersides of leaves and on apices of shoots between flowers on <i>Veronica longifolia</i>. Leaves inhabited by aphids were strongly savoyed and curled. Fundatrices was collected on the same plant on 2 July 2010 in the Eastern Taimyr and were found on 29 July 1964 nearby Norilsk (Southern Taimyr).</p> <p> <b>Systematic relationships</b>. The new species belongs to a group of species that have the characters typical for the genus <i>Aphis</i> L.: low frontal tubercles, simple setae on all body and appendages, dorsal surface of body with reticulation, relatively short antennae with a relatively short processus terminalis, elongate wedge-shaped ultimate segment of rostrum, simple legs with chaetotaxy of first tarsal segments 3, 3, 2, cylindrical siphunculi and elongate triangular or triangular finger-shaped cauda, but they can be easily distinguished from any other known species of <i>Aphis</i> by the complete or almost complete lack of marginal tubercles on abdominal segment I and the complete lack of marginal tubercles on segment VII. Up to now this group included two species described from Chukotka: <i>Aphis aquilonalis</i> Stekolshchikov et Khruleva, 2015 and <i>A. beringiensis</i> Stekolshchikov et Khruleva, 2015. From both those species <i>Aphis khrulevi</i> differs by long siphunculi, long setae on occiput and dorsal side of body and to a lesser extent on some other characters (Tabl. 3). It may be assumed that these three species have a common origin and that the species of this group inhabit arctic and subarctic areas. Hille Ris Lambers (1955) described a new species <i>Aphis atuberculata</i> on the basis of two oviparous females and nymphs of males collected also in arctic region—in Iceland. This species has very small marginal tubercles which are present only on prothorax, abdominal segment I and more rarely also on segment VII. Perhaps this species is closely related to a group of species completely devoid of marginal tubercles. In this case, the hypothesis that these species are associated only with arctic territories receives additional confirmation.</p> <p> <i>Aphis korshunovi</i> Ivanovskaja, 1971</p> <p> <b>Material. Tur</b>: <i>Veronica longifolia</i>, 17.vii.2002, al. (ESh).</p> <p> <i>Aphis mirifica</i> (Börner, 1950)</p> <p> <b>Published information. LRP</b> and <b>LRCh</b>: <i>Epilobium angustifolium</i> (Stekolshchikov, 2012).</p> <p> <b>Material. Koa</b>: <i>Epilobium angustifolium</i>, 6.vii.1998, fund. and al. (SB). <b>Luv</b>: <i>Epilobium angustifolium</i>, 17.vii.2002, apt. and al. (AS). <b>LRCh</b>: <i>Epilobium angustifolium</i>, 30.vi.2004, fund.; 3.vii.2004, fund., apt. and al.; 14.vii.2004, apt., al. and al. nym. [15.vii.2004, al.] (AS). <b>LRP</b>: <i>Epilobium angustifolium</i>, 10.vii.2005, apt. (AS).</p> <p> <i>Aphis salicariae</i> Koch, 1855</p> <p> <b>Material. Luv</b>: <i>Epilobium angustifolium</i>, 21–29.vii.2006, apt. and al. (AS).</p> <p> <i>Aphis tormentillae</i> Passerini, 1879</p> <p> <b>Material. Luv</b>: <i>Potentilla erecta</i> (L.) Raeusch, 25.vii.2002, apt., al., males and ovip. (AS).</p> <p> <i>Aphis urticata</i> J.F. Gmelin, 1790</p> <p> <b>Material. Luv</b>: <i>Urtica dioica</i> L., 20.vii.2002, apt. and al.; 31.vii.2004, apt. (AS).</p> <p> <i>Aphis ulmariae</i> Schrank, 1801</p> <p> <b>Published information. LRCh</b>: <i>Filipendula ulmaria</i> (L.) Maxim. (Stekolshchikov, 2012).</p> <p> <b>Material. LRCh</b>: <i>Filipendula ulmaria</i>, 28.vi.2004, fund. (AS).</p> <p> <i>Aphis uvaeursi</i> Ossiannilsson, 1959</p> <p> <b>Published information. LRCh</b>: <i>Arctostaphylos uva-ursi</i> (L.) Spreng. (Stekolshchikov, 2012).</p> <p> <b>Material</b>. <b>PABG</b>: <i>Arctostaphylos uva-ursi</i>, 15.vii.1962, fund. and al. nym. [19.vii.1962, al.] (GSh). <b>9SMon</b>: <i>Arctostaphylos uva-ursi</i>, 7.vii.1998, fund. (SB). <b>12SMon</b>: <i>Arctostaphylos uva-ursi</i>, 5.vii.1998, fund.; 9.vii.1998, fund.; sweeping, 9.vii.1998, fund. (SB). <b>20SMon</b>: <i>Arctostaphylos uva-ursi</i>, 9.vii.1998, fund. (SB). <b>Luv</b>: <i>Arctostaphylos uva-ursi</i>, 21.vii.2002, apt. and al.; 9.viii.2004, apt., males and ovip. (AS). <b>LRCh</b>: <i>Arctostaphylos uva-ursi</i>, 9.vii.2004, apt., al. and imm. [11.vii.2004, apt. and al.] (AS).</p> <p> <i>Aphis vaccinii</i> (Börner, 1940)</p> <p> <b>Material. Luv</b>: <i>Vaccinium uliginosum</i> L., 20.vii.2002, apt. (AS).</p>Published as part of <i>Stekolshchikov, Andrey V. & Buga, Sergey V., 2018, The aphid fauna (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha, Aphidomorpha) of Murmansk province (Russia), with description of Aphis khrulevi sp. nov. and Dysaphis karyakini sp. nov. and males of Chaitophorus nigricantis Pintera, 1987, pp. 451-493 in Zootaxa 4527 (4)</i> on pages 467-473, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4527.4.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/2612387">http://zenodo.org/record/2612387</a>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
El piano de la música de salón. Un estudio de caso en Guadalajara de Buga, 1890-1930
No full textEl artículo analiza, a partir de las partituras empastadas y obras manuscritas, entre otro tipo de fuentes, la música de salón y la interpretación del piano en Guadalajara de Buga (Valle del Cauca) entre 1897 y 1930. En particular el papel jugado por las mujeres pianistas, los compositores y directores locales. La autora estudia también la composición musical y tendencias registradas, los distintos esquemas rítmicos del vals y el pasillo manifiestos en la escritura de la música para piano. Identifica que para ciertos aires tales como el vals, el pasillo, entre otros, existen diferentes formas de ejecución del instrumento, uso del teclado, y que la armonía del repertorio está dada por el ambiente tonal. El piano se muestra como un factor diferenciador respecto de la colectividad.Palabras clave: partituras, música de salón, piano, vals, pasillo, Guadalajara de Buga The piano of the music salon. A case study in Guadalajara de Buga, 1890-1930 Abstract The article analyzes, from the bound scores and manuscript works, among other sorts of sources, salon music and piano interpretation in Guadalajara de Buga (Valle del Cauca) between 1897 and 1930, in particular, the role played by the female pianists, the composers, and local directors. The author also studies reported musical composition and tendencies, the distinct rhythmic schemes of the waltz and the pasillo manifested in the writing of piano music. She identifies that for certain tunes such as the waltz, the pasillo, among others, the different ways of using the instrument and the keys which exist, and that repertoire harmony is made by the tonal environment. The piano is shown to be a differentiating factor, with regard to collectivity. Keywords: scores, salon music, piano, waltz, pasillo, Guadalajara de Buga
Dysaphis karyakini Stekolshchikov & Buga 2018, sp. nov.
No full textDysaphis karyakini sp. nov. (Figs. 20–35, Tabl. 4) Type material. Holotype: apterous viviparous female, No. 9205, slide No. 5, specimen No. 2 (right specimen in upper row). “ Dysaphis karyakini sp. nov., 21.vii.2002, Murmansk Region, Kandalakshsky District, near vill. Luvenga, Cenolophium denudatum (Hornem.) Tutin., on root colar, leg. A.V. Stekolshchikov ”. Paratypes (all specimens from the same locality and host plant as holotype): 41 apt., No. 9205, 21.vii.2002; 1 apt., 8 al. and 6 ovip. No. 9205- 17.VIII, 22.vii—19.viii.2002 (adults were reared between 22.vii and 19.viii from imm. transfered to plants in laboratory conditions); 4 apt., No. 9244, 2.viii.2002; 27 apt. and 4 ovip., No. 9389, 9.viii.2004; 2 apt. and 3 males, No. 9389- 15.VIII, 15.viii.2004 (adults were reared from imm. transferred to plants in laboratory conditions); 2 apt. and 1 al., No. 9496, 17.vii.2005; 11 apt. and 1 al., No. 9720, 2.viii.2006. Holotype is deposited at ZIN RAS; paratypes are deposited at collections of ZIN RAS, NHM, and MNHN. Etymology. The new species is named in honor of the recently deceased eminent Russian ornithologist and vice-director of the Kandalaksha State Nature Reserve Alexander Sergeevich Koryakin who devoted his whole life to study and conservation of the nature of the Kola Peninsula and the adjacent territories. Description. Apterous viviparous female. Body elliptical or broadly elliptical, 1.4–2.1 (1.6) times as long as width. The living specimens gray-green, light gray-green or light greenish yellow with pinkish head and thorax and distinct waxy pulverulence; antennae and femora (except bases and apices) dark grey, apices of antennae, apices of femora, apices of tibia, tarsi and siphunculi dark, cauda pale. Cleared specimens with dark brown 3rd–6th (exept base of 3rd segment) or only 5th–6th antennal segments, ultimate segment of rostrum, tarsi and siphunculi; with brown head, 1st and 2nd antennal segments, penultimate segment of rostrum, femora, apices of tibia, bands on thorax and abdomen, subgenital and anal plate and cauda; with light-brown peritremes on abdomen. Thorax with wide sclerotized band on pronotum interrupted in the middle, abdominal dorsum with narrow sclerotized bands on abdominal tergites V–VIII, occasionally with very small (slightly larger than the tubercle in the base of the setae) pair sclerites on tergites III–IV, with hardly visible marginal sclerites in the form of a thin rim around large marginal tubercles and light-brown peritrems on abdominal segments I–VII; band on abdominal tergite V often short or divided into separate sclerites, bands on abdominal tergites VI–VII also, but very rare, can divided into separate sclerites; sclerotized band and marginal maculae on tergite VII never fused. Surface of head, dorsal sides of thorax, abdominal tergites I–VI and sometimes of anterior half of abdominal tergite VII reticulate, contour of cells forming by very flat fused large spinules; the reticulation on head is well marked only on occiput, on other parts of the head, on thorax, abdominal tergites I–VI and anterior half of abdominal tergite VII contours of cells are indistinct, reticulation very bad marked; surface of posterior half of abdominal tergite VII or whole abdominal tergite VII with the long rows of small pointed spinules, which on tergites VIII partially fused to form scales; surface of ventral side of thorax smooth, of abdomen with long rows of small pointed spinules sometimes forming strongly stretched reticulate cells. Setae on dorsal side of thorax and abdomen blunt or very weakly capitate, on ventral side of thorax and abdomen pointed. Pronotum without posterior pleural setae. Marginal tubercles always present on prothorax and abdominal segments I–V, they are large, flat or weakly protuberant, diameter of tubercles 2.5–8.0 times as long as high; marginal tubercles also present on metathorax in 22% of specimens (2 tubercles in 3% of specimens), on abdominal segment VI in 63% (2 tubercles in 11% of specimens) and on abdominal segment VII in 93% of specimens (2 in 61%). Spinal tubercles always present on head (2 tubercles in 99% of specimens), on pronotum in 34% of specimens (2 tubercles in 3% of specimens), on abdominal tergite VII in 48% (2 in 13%), on VIII in 99% (2 in 61%) and one tubercle present on mesonotum in 1% of specimens. Head with traces of epicranial coronal suture. Frontal tubercles low; median tubercle wide, occupies large part of frons and surpassing or rarely not reaching the level of antennal tubercles. Occipital and frontal setae blunt, setae on ventral side of head blunt or pointed. Antennae 6-segmented, 1st and 2nd antennal segments slightly wrinkled, with small scales on inner side, 3rd–6th segments with large scales. Third antennal segment with 1–32 (12.1–16.9) secondary rhinaria of different sizes (from 4 to 20 mµ), 4th segment with 4–16 (6.5–9.0) and 5th segment with 0–7 (0.0–2.5) secondary rhinaria. Setae on antennae blunt or pointed. Rostrum reaching abdominal segment I–IV. Ultimate rostral segment elongate wedge-shaped with straight or slightly concave sides, 1.91–3.20 (2.20–2.67) times as long as its basal width. Arms of mesosternal furca separated. Legs normal, setae on legs blunt or pointed, rarely finely pointed. Chaetotaxy of first tarsal segments 3, 3, 2 (very rarely on one middle leg first tarsal segment with 2 setae). Spiracles reniform. Peritremes on abdominal sternites I and II widely spaced, but sometimes separated by a distance lesser than diameter of peritreme, continuous or, rarely fused. Siphunculi cylindrical, gradually tapering towards apex, sometimes slightly curved into S-shape, coarsely imbricate and with distinct flange. Subgenital plate oval, setae on subgenital and anal plate finely pointed. Cauda escutcheon-like, with long finely pointed setae. Measurements of holotype. Body—2208×1421, antenna—1292: III—386×43 (in the middle), IV—197, V— 142, VI—99 +281; hind femur—538, hind tibia—964; siphunculus—240×51 (in the middle); cauda—109×144 (at base) ×111 (before base). For more biometric data see Table 4. Alate viviparous female. Body elliptical, 1.8–2.2 (2.0) times as long as its width. The living specimens light gray-green with weakly waxy pulverulence; head, thorax, antennae, apices of fore femora, middle and hind tibia, tarsi and siphunculi dark. Cleared specimens with dark head, thorax, antennae, ultimate segment of rostrum, femora (exept on base), apices of tibia, tarsi and siphunculi; with brown penultimate segment of rostrum, bands on abdomen, subgenital and anal plate and cauda; with light-brown peritremes on abdomen. Abdominal dorsum with sclerotized bands on abdominal tergites III–VIII, marginal sclerites and light-brown peritrems on abdominal segments I–VII; band on abdominal tergite III sometimes divided into separate sclerites, bands on abdominal tergites IV–V sometimes fused anterolaterally in a small sclerotized spot with a membranous area on the boundary between tergites; sclerotized band and marginal maculae on tergite VII never fused. Surface of head and meso- and metothorax wrinkled, of prothorax with the long rows of small pointed spicules, of abdominal tergites I–VI and anterior half of abdominal tergite VII reticulate (contour of cells forming by large pointed spinules), surface of posterior half of abdominal tergite VII with the long rows of small pointed spinules, which on tergites VIII partially fuse to form scales. Head without traces of epicranial coronal suture. Frontal tubercles low but distinct; median tubercle wide, occupies large part of frons and surpassing the level of antennal tubercles. Antennae 6-segmented, but one specimen has 5-segmented antennae by fussion of 3rd and 4th segments, 1st and 2nd antennal segments with small scales mostly on inner side. Third antennal segment with 27–36 (32.9) (specimen with 5-segmented antennae has 45–50 secondary rhinaria on 3rd segment) of different sizes (from 5 to 22 mµ), 4th segment with 8–15 (11.0) and 5th segment with 2–4 (2.9) secondary rhinaria; secondary rhinaria are round, projecting, with external diameter 2.3–5.2 times as long as high of rhinaria. Rostrum reaching abdominal segment I–II. Ultimate rostral segment with slightly concave sides, 2.44–2.91 (2.70) times as long as its basal width. Peritremes on abdominal sternites I and II separated by a distance lesser than diameter of peritreme or fused. Male. Apterous. Body broadly elliptical, 1.6–1.7 times as long as width. The living specimens brownish graygreen with brown head and thorax, black antennae, apices of tibia and tarsi, grey middle and hind femora and dark grey siphunculi. Cleared specimens with dark head, prothorax, antennae, ultimate segment of rostrum, femora (except on base), apices of tibia, tarsi and siphunculi; with brown penultimate segment of rostrum, bands on abdomen, subgenital and anal plate and cauda; with light-brown peritremes on abdomen. Thorax with wide sclerotized band on pronotum, abdominal dorsum with sclerotized bands on abdominal tergites III–VIII and with marginal sclerites in the form of a thin rim around large marginal tubercles and peritrems on abdominal segments I–VII; bands on abdominal tergite IV–V often short and band on tergite III always divided into separate sclerites; sclerotized band and marginal maculae on tergite VII sometimes fused. Setae on dorsal side of thorax and abdomen blunt or pointed. Antennae 6-segmented, but one specimen has one 5-segmented antenna as a result of fusing of 3rd and 4th segments, 1st and 2nd antennal segments with small scales mostly on inner side. Third antennal segment with 13–15 (14.3) (specimen with one 5-segmented antennae has 23 secondary rhinaria on 3rd segment of this antenna) of small sizes (from 5 to 13 mµ), 4th segment with 7–14 (11.3) and 5th segment with 3–7 (5.4) secondary rhinaria. Peritremes on abdominal sternites I and II widely spaced or separated by a distance lesser than diameter of peritreme. Hind tibiae with 0–6 (2.5) round pheromone plates located on very weak swollen base of tibia. Oviparous female. Body 1.6–1.9 (1.7) times as long as width. The living specimens pale rose or light greenish yellow with pinkish head and thorax, with weakly waxy pulverulence; apices of antennae and tibia, tarsi and siphunculi dark brown. Sclerotized bands on abdominal tergites V–VI absent or, if present, very small, no more than medium-size sclerites, bands on abdominal tergites VII–VIII also short and often divided into separate sclerites. Antennae 6-segmented, third antennal segment with 0–1 (0.1), 4th segment with 0–2 (0.6) and 5th segment with 0–1 (0.1) secondary rhinaria. Peritremes on abdominal sternites I and II widely spaced, but sometimes separated by a distance lesser than diameter of peritreme. Hind tibiae with 9–23 (14.3–18.5) round pheromone plates located on very weak swollen base of tibia. Apterous viviparous Alate viviparous Males Oviparous females females females Number of samples / number of specimens 5 / 89 3 / 10 1 / 3 2 / 10 Length of body 1447 – 2436 1457 – 1969 1441 – 1452 1579 – 2030 (1819 – 2139) (1579 – 1787) (1445) (1724 – 1888) Length of antenna 914 – 1292 996 – 1223 965 – 1004 790 – 984 (995 – 1096) (1100) (987) (836 – 944) Length of antenna / length of body 0.46 – 0.76 0.58 – 0.71 0.66 – 0.70 0.41 – 0.56 (0.50 – 0.61) (0.59 – 0.70) (0.68) (0.49) Hind femora length 330 – 538 452 – 538 396 – 426 330 – 406 (421 – 447) (462 – 506) (407) (358 – 388) length / length of body 0.19 – 0.28 0.26 – 0.34 0.27 – 0.30 0.18 – 0.22 (0.20 – 0.24) (0.29) (0.28) (0.21) length / head width across the compound eyes 0.80 – 1.10 1.09 – 1.27 0.93 – 0.95 0.82 – 0.86 (0.83 – 0.96) (1.15) (0.94) (0.84) Hind tibia length 650 – 964 843 – 1020 660 – 721 589 – 711 (731 – 790) (853 – 943) (695) (615 – 674) length / length of body 0.33 – 0.51 0.49 – 0.62 0.45 – 0.50 0.31 – 0.40 (0.35 – 0.44) (0.54) (0.48) (0.36) Head width across the compound eyes 422 – 526 410 – 427 424 – 444 427 – 479 (468) (420) (434) (443) Setae on head occipital length 10 – 18 13 – 14 15 – 18 13 – 18 (14) (16) (13) length / articular diameter of 3rd 0.47 – 0.92 0.61 – 0.63 0.75 – 0.93 0.67 – 1.00 antennal segment (0.65 – 0.75) (0.83) (0.81) frontal length 13 – 20 14 – 18 15 – 18 13 – 18 (16) (15) (17) (15) length / articular diameter of 3rd 0.52 – 1.07 0.56 – 0.69 0.75 – 1.00 0.71 – 1.17 antennal segment (0.72 – 0.80) (0.61) (0.89) (0.92) number on 1st antennal segment 5 – 10 6 – 9 6 – 9 6 – 9 (7.8) (6.0 – 7.5) (7.8) (7.2) on 3rd antennal number 10 – 22 9 – 19 13 – 22 10 – 15 segment (13.8 – 16.0) (14.1 – 17.5) (15.2) (11.8 – 13.5) length 10 – 15 11 – 14 15 – 18 13 – 14 (12) (13) (16) (13) length / articular diameter of 3rd 0.44 – 0.86 0.50 – 0.65 0.75 – 0.93 0.67 – 0.92 antennal segment (0.60) (0.61) (0.81) (0.71 – 0.82) Setae on base of last number 2 – 4 2 – 4 2 – 3 2 – 3 antennal segment (2.8 – 3.2) (3.1) (2.4) (2.8) length / articular diameter of 6th antennal 0.53 – 0.86 0.67 – 0.91 0.62 – 0.91 0.64 – 0.83 segment (0.67 – 0.77) (0.78) (0.77) (0.69 – 0.81) length of ventral seta on hind trochanter / basal diameter of hind 0.34 – 0.62 0.33 – 0.44 0.44 – 0.57 0.39 – 0.57 femur (0.46) (0.36) (0.52) (0.45) on hind femur length of longest dorsal 13 – 23 14 – 18 18 – 23 18 – 20 (18) (16) (19) (19) ventral 15 – 23 14 – 18 18 – 20 15 – 20 (18) (16) (20) (18) on hind tibia longest dorsal 28 – 58 18 – 35 30 – 43 38 – 63 (42 – 54) (30) (37) (47) longest dorsal / mid-diameter of the hind 0.74 – 1.39 0.54 – 1.17 0.92 – 1.31 0.64 – 1.13 tibia (1.07 – 1.30) (0.91) (1.08) (0.87) number on 2nd dorsal 1 – 3 2 2 1 – 2 segment of hind tarsus (2.0 – 2.5) (1.9) ventral 1 – 2 1 – 3 2 – 3 2 (1.9) (2.4) (2.2) on abdominal tergite number of spinal and marginal 9 – 20 10 – 14 13 – 22 11 – 18 III (13.4 – 14.8) (11.6) (16.3) (13.9) length 10 – 16 9 – 15 13 – 15 13 – 15 (12 – 14) (13 – 15) (14) (13) length / articular diameter of 3rd antennal 0.47 – 0.77 0.44 – 0.75 0.63 – 0.75 0.71 – 0.92 segment (0.60) (0.60 – 0.73) (0.68) (0.81) on abdominal tergite number 4 – 11 4 – 7 6 – 10 10 – 17 VIII (6.5 – 8.3) (5.9) (8.3) (11.2 – 14.8) length 13 – 25 15 – 20 20 – 28 25 – 38 (17 – 24) (19) (24) (30) length / articular diameter of 3rd antennal 0.66 – 1.38 0.75 – 1.00 1.00 – 1.47 1.47 – 2.14 segment (0.83 – 1.18) (0.89) (1.22) (1.82) number on subgenital on anterior half 2 – 7 2 – 4 – 28 – 42 plate (2.5 – 3.9) (2.6) (33.8) along the hind margin 14 – 23 14 – 20 – 25 – 44 (17.3 – 19.3) (18.0) (33.8 – 38.0) Last antennal segment length of base 78 – 110 89 – 106 70 – 81 73 – 96 (84 – 93) (95) (75) (82 – 91) length of processus terminalis 202 – 301 278 – 340 249 – 258 182 – 238 (234 – 268) (310) (254) (199 – 226) length of processsus terminalis / length of base 2.35 – 3.33 2.90 – 3.84 3.13 – 3.71 2.16 – 2.62 (2.79 – 2.94) (3.19 – 3.67) (3.38) (2.45) Distribution. Known only from the type locality—Russia, Murmansk province, Kandalakshsky District, nearby Luvenga Vill. Biology. Monoecious, holocyclic. Colonies of this species were always situated on the root collar and in the leaf-sheath of the basal leaves of Cenolophium denudatum and were covered with soil by ants. A colony found on 21 July 2002 consisted of apterous viviparous females and nymphs both with and without pterotheca. Nymphs were transferred to plants in laboratory conditions, where on 22 July 2002 alate viviparous females and on 17–19 August 2002 several oviparous females were reared. In other years colonies were found in the period from 17 July to 9 August. On the latter date oviparous females were present in the colony, on other dates the colonies consisted of apterous viviparous females and immatures, with sometimes single alatae also present. Systematic relationships. Until now, no aphids of the genus Dysaphis have been recorded from Cenolophium. The apterous viviparous female of Dysaphis karyakini does not have posterior pleural setae that distinguish it from other species belonging to the group close to D. devecta (Walker, 1849) living on Apiaceae. The lack of marginal tubercles on the meso- and metathorax distinguishes D. karyakini from species close to D. newskyi and D. hirsutissima, whereas the presence of marginal tubercles on abdominal tergites VI–VII distinguishes it from species of the D. crataegi and D. foeniculus groups. Among all Dysaphis species living on Apiaceae, the new species is morphologically most similar to Dysaphis uralensis Shaposhnikov, 1956, but can be easily differentiated by the length of the longest additional setae on the ultimate rostral segment: 10–15 µm for D. uralensis and 32–53 µm for Dysaphis karyakini sp. nov. A comparison of these species by the length of setae located on other parts of the body and appendages is given in Table 5. Dysaphis newskyi (Börner, 1940) Material. Luv: Heracleum sibiricum L., 25.vii.2002, apt. and ovip.; 28.vii.2003, apt., apterous male and ovip.; 13.viii.2004, apt., males, ovip. and imm. [5.ix.2004, male]; 17.vii.2005, apt.; 22.vii.2006, apt. and al. (AS +ESh). Dysaphis (Pomaphis) sorbi (Kaltenbach, 1843) Published information. LRCh: Sorbus aucuparia L. (Stekolshchikov, 2012). Material. PXS: Sorbus sp., 17.viii.1938, apt. (UN). Kolv: Sorbus aucuparia, 28.vii.2002, apt. and gyn. (AS). LRCh: Sorbus aucuparia, 30.vi.2004, fund. (AS). Luv: Sorbus aucuparia, 19.vii.2003, apt.; 3.viii.2004, apt., gyn. and imm. [7–21.viii.2004, gyn. and ovip.] (AS +ESh). Kovd: Sorbus aucuparia, 2.vii.2004, fund. (VZh). Muscaphis escherichi (Börner, 1939) Material. Luv: Sorbus aucuparia, 21.vii.2002, fund. and al. nym. [24.vii.2002, em.]; 19.vii.2003, fund.; 30.vii.2004, al. nym. [2–8.viii.2004, em.] (AS +ESh). Nearctaphis vera (Shaposhnikov, 1964) Published information. Khi: Oxytropis sordida (Shaposhnikov, 1964, as Mamontova vera, gen. and sp. n.; Heie, 1992). Material. PABG: Oxytropis sordida, 29.vii.1962, al. [30.vii.1962, imm.] (GSh).Published as part of Stekolshchikov, Andrey V. & Buga, Sergey V., 2018, The aphid fauna (Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha, Aphidomorpha) of Murmansk province (Russia), with description of Aphis khrulevi sp. nov. and Dysaphis karyakini sp. nov. and males of Chaitophorus nigricantis Pintera, 1987, pp. 451-493 in Zootaxa 4527 (4) on pages 474-481, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4527.4.1, http://zenodo.org/record/261238
Apoyo psicoeducativo a la formación integral del programa de media técnica del centro agropecuario Buga SENA
No full textEl presente documento tiene como finalidad mostrar el proceso de práctica psicológica a través de una intervención psicoeducativa realizada en el Centro Agropecuario Buga (CAB) SENA. Para ello se efectúo el diagnóstico y se propuso el diseño y ejecución de dos ejes de intervención, que tenían como objetivo apoyar la formación integral en el programa de media técnica, con estudiantes de los grados décimo y once de 5 instituciones públicas de la zona centro (Buga), aportando así la labor del psicólogo educativo a una acción formativa que buscaba potenciar las actividades académicas y al mismo tiempo proporcionar escenarios para la construcción de saberes significativos para que los estudiantes lograran la realización de proyectos de vida, estableciendo metas personales y profesionales.The present document has as purpose show the process of psychological practice across an intervention psicoeducativa realized in the Agricultural Center Buga (CAB) SENA. For it I effect the diagnosis and one proposed the design and execution of two axes of intervention, which had as aim support the integral formation(training) in the program of technical average, with students of the degrees tenth and eleven of 5 public institutions of the zone I center (Buga), contributing this way the labor of the educational psychologist to a formative action that was seeking to promote the academic activities and at the same time to provide scenes for the construction of to know significant in order that the students were achieving the project accomplishment of life, establishing personal and professional goals.Universidad Católica de Pereira. Director: Vittoria Angélica Gómez Organización: Centro Agropecuario Buga SENA. Jefe Inmediato: Leonardo Tafur Calderó
- …
