82 research outputs found

    The Myth of What Is Inevitable under Ecosystem Management: A Response to Pardy

    No full text
    In this article, the author responds to Professor Bruce Pardy\u27s article, Changing Nature: The Myth of the Inevitability of Ecosystem Management, which appeared in Pace Environmental Law Review\u27s Spring 2003 Edition. The author criticizes Pardy\u27s characterization of change nature policy and, as an advocate of Ecosystem Management, seeks to posit his views on the policy

    The Pardy-Ruhl Dialogue on Ecosystem Management, Part IV: Narrowing and Sharpening the Questions

    No full text
    This article, fourth in a five-part dialogue appearing in the Pace ELR, further responds to Professor Bruce Pardy's critique of ecosystem management. I defend ecosystem management, arguing it does not involve the standardless, unbridled administrative discretion Pardy suggests

    The Pardy-Ruhl Dialogue on Ecosystem Management, Part IV: Narrowing and Sharpening the Questions

    No full text
    This article, fourth in a five-part dialogue appearing in the Pace ELR, further responds to Professor Bruce Pardy's critique of ecosystem management. I defend ecosystem management, arguing it does not involve the standardless, unbridled administrative discretion Pardy suggests

    The Myth of What is Inevitable Under Ecosystem Management: A Response to Pardy

    No full text
    This article, second in a five-part dialogue appearing in the Pace ELR, responds to Professor Bruce Pardy's initial evaluation of ecosystem management. I defend ecosystem management, arguing it is not directed at changing nature as Pardy suggests

    Institutional reform in emerging securities markets

    No full text
    In the long run, sound, efficient securities markets can contribute to economic growth; in the short run, they play an important role in financial liberalization. The author provides a guide to issues involved in institutional and regulatory reform of securities markets - and a discussion of the practical implications of different policy options and sequencing decisions. He argues that establishing sound securities markets requires institutional development that is a substantial task for many developing countries. Prerequisities for the development of securities markets include: (a) a macroeconomic and fiscal environment conducive to the supply of quality securities; (b) a legal, regulatory, and institutional infrastructure that can support efficient operation of the securities market. Essentially such an infrastructure must provide four things: (a) certainty about property rights and contracts; (b) transparent trading and other procedures and public disclosure by companies of all information relevant to the value of their securities; (c) protection against unfair practices by insiders and intermediaries; and (d) protection against the financial failure of intermediaries and market institutions such as clearinghouses. The author also provides examples of the policy conflicts and uncertainties that are routine in securities market reform and development, and suggests approaches to managing them.Financial Intermediation,Environmental Economics&Policies,Insurance&Risk Mitigation,Banks&Banking Reform,Economic Theory&Research

    Changing Nature: The Myth of the Inevitability of Ecosystem Management

    No full text
    In this article, the author argues that ecosystem management is a policy choice masquerading as an inevitability. Ecosystem management is a process that measures, controls and changes ecosystems to produce the most desirable environment in human terms. The article begins with a discussion of two developments from which ecosystem management derives its legitimacy, the theory of nonequilibrium in ecosystems and the extinction of pristine systems: ecosystems exist in a fluid and dynamic state, and there are no ecosystems that are completely unaffected by human impact. Therefore, according to the prevailing view, it is not possible to preserve ecosystems in a natural state. The author questions the logic of that conclusion, arguing that neither nonequilibrium nor the absence of pristine systems dictates that ecosystems must be controlled and deliberately changed. The article\u27s contention is not that natural is preferable, but that it is possible, and that the debate between ecological preservation and environmental utilitarianism can and should occur. If science and law dictate that there are no options but to deliberately change ecosystems, as the managers believe, then the debate has no relevance. Thus, the thesis is not that ecological preservation is a better choice than ecosystem management, but that there is a choice to make

    Environmental Law: A Guide to Concepts

    No full text
    Book review of Environmental Law: A Guide to Concepts by Bruce Pardy and published by Butterworths (Toronto), 1996. (293 pp.

    LETTER TO THE EDITOR REGARDING: EVOLVING BUSINESS MODELS IN ORTHOTICS BY SCHNEIDER, N.

    No full text
    The purpose of this letter is to continue the dialogue regarding the paper "Evolving business models in Orthotics" in the Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal Volume 4, Issue2, No.3, 2021. In it we present the perspective of the current Alberta Association of Orthotists and Prosthetists (AAOP) and provide additional context and information on historical events. Finally, we provide additional clarity on how costing is approached in the Province of Alberta (Canada) and the purported inequity in compensation between the two disciplines. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/38313/30512 How To Cite: Pardy C, Scott S, Barnert J, Reimer C. Letter to the editor regarding: Evolving business models in orthotics by Schneider N. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2022; Volume 5, Issue 2, No.5. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v5i2.38313 Corresponding Author: Connor Pardy, M.Sc., CPO Alberta Orthotic and Prosthetic Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada. Past-President of the Alberta Association of Orthotists and Prosthetists E-Mail: [email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4475-977
    corecore