1,720,982 research outputs found

    New chitosan derivatives for the preparation of rokitamycin loaded microspheres designed for ocular or nasal administration

    No full text
    Acanthamoeba spp. are the causative agents of granulomatous amoebic encephalitis (GAE) and amoebic keratitis. Recent studies performed by Rassu et al. showed that, compared with the free drug, the loading of rokitamycin in chitosan microspheres improves and prolongs the in vitro antiamoebic activity of rokitamycin. This could be useful in transporting the drug for either ocular application to treat amoebic keratitis or nasal administration as an alternative route for the administration of the drug to the brain in GAE therapy. Starting from the previous study, our goal was to optimize the technological parameters in order to obtain chitosan microparticles loaded with rokitamycin and to evaluate the use of new quaternary ammonium chitosan derivatives in the preparation of spray dried microspheres containing the macrolide; these derivatives showed better characteristics (solubility, penetration enhancement) compared with chitosan itself. Toxicity studies on new polymers were performed. Spray dried loaded microspheres based on chitosan or chitosan derivatives were obtained by using appropriate preparative parameters. Microparticles containing chitosan derivatives showed similar or often better properties than formulations made of chitosan with respect to size, in vitro release behaviour and mucoadhesiveness thus making them more suitable for ocular or nasal administration. New polymers did not demonstrate cytotoxicity

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore