130,515 research outputs found
Modular Termination Verification
Full text linkWe propose an approach for the modular specification and verification of total correctness properties of object-oriented programs. We start from an existing program logic for partial correctness based on separation logic and abstract predicate families. We extend it with call permissions qualified by an arbitrary ordinal number, and we define a specification style that properly hides implementation details, based on the ideas of using methods and bags of methods as ordinals, and exposing the bag of methods reachable from an object as an abstract predicate argument. These enable each method to abstractly request permission to call all methods reachable by it any finite number of times, and to delegate similar permissions to its callees. We illustrate the approach with several examples
MeSH term explosion and author rank improve expert recommendations
Full text linkInformation overload is an often-cited phenomenon that reduces the productivity, efficiency and efficacy of scientists. One challenge for scientists is to find appropriate collaborators in their research. The literature describes various solutions to the problem of expertise location, but most current approaches do not appear to be very suitable for expert recommendations in biomedical research. In this study, we present the development and initial evaluation of a vector space model-based algorithm to calculate researcher similarity using four inputs: 1) MeSH terms of publications; 2) MeSH terms and author rank; 3) exploded MeSH terms; and 4) exploded MeSH terms and author rank. We developed and evaluated the algorithm using a data set of 17,525 authors and their 22,542 papers. On average, our algorithms correctly predicted 2.5 of the top 5/10 coauthors of individual scientists. Exploded MeSH and author rank outperformed all other algorithms in accuracy, followed closely by MeSH and author rank. Our results show that the accuracy of MeSH term-based matching can be enhanced with other metadata such as author rank
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
"Closing the R&D Gap, Evaluating the Sources of R&D Spending"
Full text linkBoth spending and tax policies have been implemented in the United States with the goal of stimulating private sector research and development (R&D). Karier questions whether current R&D policy, especially the research and experimentation tax credit, can contribute to closing the gap between nondefense expenditures on R&D in the United States and such expenditures in other countries, such as Japan and Germany. He also explores possible changes to our current R&D policy to make it more effective.
Third Dutch model checking day, Eindhoven, November 7, 2001 : proceedings
Full text linkThis report contains the preliminary proceedings of the third Dutch Model Checking Day, held on 7th November 2001 at the Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. Model checking is an automatic technique for verifying hardware and software systems. The advance of the research in this area in the past few years has lead to a significant improvement of the model checking tools. Successful applications of model checking have been reported in the verification of a wide variety of systems, like complex sequential circuit designs and communication protocols. An important evidence of the great practical potential of model checking is the development of in-house model checking tools within the major companies from the information and telecommunication industry. The objective of the Model Checking Day was to bring together researchers and practitioners from academia and industry who are interested in model checking. The presentations featured both practical and theoretical advances in the area. This includes new techniques and methodologies, as well as experience with their application in various areas, such as embedded systems, communication protocols, hardware components, production processes, etc. Besides this, the Model Checking Day provided an opportunity to exchange experiences, and to have discussions about new ideas and the latest developments in the area. This proceedings contains contributions related to the presentations on this day, details are given in the table of contents. The Model Checking Day received generous support from the Formal Methods Group of the Technische Universiteit Eindhoven and the research school IPA (Institute for Programming research and Algorithmics). At this point I would like to thank the members of the program committee Dragan Bosnacki (TU/e Computer Science), Leszek Holenderski (Philips Research) and Jeroen Voeten (TU/e Electrical Engineering), and the secretary Elize Russell (TU/e Computer Science) for all their work
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Third Dutch model checking day, Eindhoven, November 7, 2001 : proceedings
Full text linkThis report contains the preliminary proceedings of the third Dutch Model Checking Day, held on 7th November 2001 at the Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. Model checking is an automatic technique for verifying hardware and software systems. The advance of the research in this area in the past few years has lead to a significant improvement of the model checking tools. Successful applications of model checking have been reported in the verification of a wide variety of systems, like complex sequential circuit designs and communication protocols. An important evidence of the great practical potential of model checking is the development of in-house model checking tools within the major companies from the information and telecommunication industry. The objective of the Model Checking Day was to bring together researchers and practitioners from academia and industry who are interested in model checking. The presentations featured both practical and theoretical advances in the area. This includes new techniques and methodologies, as well as experience with their application in various areas, such as embedded systems, communication protocols, hardware components, production processes, etc. Besides this, the Model Checking Day provided an opportunity to exchange experiences, and to have discussions about new ideas and the latest developments in the area. This proceedings contains contributions related to the presentations on this day, details are given in the table of contents. The Model Checking Day received generous support from the Formal Methods Group of the Technische Universiteit Eindhoven and the research school IPA (Institute for Programming research and Algorithmics). At this point I would like to thank the members of the program committee Dragan Bosnacki (TU/e Computer Science), Leszek Holenderski (Philips Research) and Jeroen Voeten (TU/e Electrical Engineering), and the secretary Elize Russell (TU/e Computer Science) for all their work
Scholarly Communication and Publishing Lunch and Learn Talk #11: The ULS Open Access Author Fee Fund
No full textAt the May 2014 talk, you will learn about the ULS Open Access Author Fee Fund--what it is, why we do it, how it works, and how the program is going so far
The R&D Tax Incentives
No full textThis article sets out some background information and reflections of the author on the R&D tax incentive schemes included in the Common Corporate Tax Base (CCTB) Proposal. In particular the author analyzes the stimulus to private R&D through ad hoc tax incentives included in the CCTB Proposal and dives into the actual provisions included in the Proposal highlighting the most relevant issues connected with their design and interpretation. Moreover, the author explores the interaction between the CCTB Proposal and the granting by Member States of domestic R&D tax incentives
- …
