1,721,067 research outputs found
MONITORING RESPIRATORY DISEASE AT SLAUGHTERHOUSE USING LUNG AND PLEURAL LESIONS SCORE AND SEROLOGY.
No full textIntraindividual and intraspecies variability of ITS1 sequences in the ancient asexual Darwinula stevensoni (Crustacea: Ostracoda)
No full textStudio delle modificazioni temporali della comunità di Acari e Collemboli nel suolo sotto carcasse di origine animale: implicazioni forensi
No full textMONITORAGGIO DELLA PATOLOGIA RESPIRATORIA ATTRAVERSO LA VALUTAZIONE DELLE LESIONI POLMONARI, PLEURICHE E DELLA SIEROLOGIA
No full textPreliminary considerations on sushi as potentially hazardous food
Full text linkThe Authors studied physicochemical properties (pH and Aw) of samples of Nigiri sushi and their ingredients along their shelf life, integrating those results with a predictive microbiological model, in order to determine or to rule out the growth of Listeria monocytogenes above the thresholds set by Reg.(EU) 2073/2005. Results point towards substantial containment of the target biological hazard, even though the prevention of thermal abuse is a keypoint in increasing safety
MONITORING CHRONIC PLEURITIS DUE TO Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae AT SLAUGHTERHOUSE BY A NEWLY IMPLEMENTED SCORING SYSTEM
No full textESβL E. coli isolated in pig's chain: Genetic analysis associated to the phenotype and biofilm synthesis evaluation.
Full text link
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
