1,720,964 research outputs found

    Oggetti solidi

    No full text
    Recensione al volume di Virginia Woolf "Oggetti solidi. Tutti i racconti e altre prose", a cura di Liliana Rampello, traduzioni di A. Bottini e F. Durante

    L'eredità del pensiero ecologico

    No full text
    Introduzione al numero tematico "Ecocritica e ecodiscorso. Nuove reciprocità tra umanità e pianeta"; sintesi e problematizzazione della corrente ecocritica nel mondo anglo-americano, francese e italiano; presentazione delle sezioni e dei contributi del volume

    Keeping the Right Rhythm; the Italian (Re)translations of Virginia Woolf

    No full text
    Virginia Woolf prose was translated in Italian for the first time in 1927. It was Carlo Linati, friend and translator of James Joyce, to translate her work, choosing some extracts from Mrs Dalloway and publishing them in the pages of «La fiera letteraria», a well known and widespread literary journal. The first Italian edition of Mrs Dalloway, though, was published only in 1946, inaugurating Alberto Mondadori’s wide project to publish Virginia Woolf’s Opera Omnia. The essay examines Carlo Linati’s first translation attempts by comparing them to the first Italian edition of Mrs Dalloway, translated by Alessandra Scalero, and to more recent translations by Nadia Fusini (Feltrinelli 1993) and Anna Nadotti (Einaudi 2012). Eventually, extracts from an unpublished translation of The Years by Alessandra Scalero are presented and compared to Guido De Angelis’ translation, published by Mondadori in 1955, and to the most recent one by Antonio Bibbo, published by Feltrinelli in 2015. What emerges from these comparisons is the translators’ struggle to render Woolf’s experimental style by focusing on the crucial role of rhythm in her prose

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore