1,720,959 research outputs found
Understanding and Exploiting the Latent Space to improve Machine Learning models eXplainability
Full text linkIn recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) systems
have dramatically increased their capabilities, achieving human-like or even humansuperior
performance in specific tasks. This increased performance has gone hand
in hand with an increase in the complexity of AI and ML models, compromising
their transparency and trustworthiness and making them inscrutable black boxes for
decision making. Explainable AI (XAI) is a field that seeks to make the decisions
suggested by ML models more transparent to human users, by providing different
types of explanations. This thesis explores the possibility of using a reduced feature
space called “latent space”, produced by a particular kind of ML models, as a means
for the explanation process. First, we study the possibility of navigating the latent
space as a form of interactive explanation to better understand the rationale behind
the model’s predictions. Second, we propose an interpretable-by-design approach
to make the explanation process completely transparent to the user. Third, we
exploit mathematical properties of the latent space of certain ML models (similarity
and linearity) to produce explanations that are shown more plausible and accurate
than those of existing competitors in the state of the art. In order to validate our
approach, we perform extensive benchmarking on different datasets, with respect to
both existing metrics and new ones introduced in our work to highlight new XAI
problems, beyond current literature
Transparent Latent Space Counterfactual Explanations for Tabular Data
No full textArtificial Intelligence decision-making systems have dramatically increased their predictive performance in recent years, beating humans in many different specific tasks. However, with increased performance has come an increase in the complexity of the black-box models adopted by the AI systems, making them entirely obscure for the decision process adopted. Explainable AI is a field that seeks to make AI decisions more transparent by producing explanations. In this paper, we propose T-LACE, an approach able to retrieve post-hoc counterfactual explanations for a given pre-trained black-box model. T-LACE exploits the similarity and linearity proprieties of a custom-created transparent latent space to build reliable counterfactual explanations. We tested T-LACE on several tabular datasets and provided qualitative evaluations of the generated explanations in terms of similarity, robustness, and diversity. Comparative analysis against various state-of-the-art counterfactual explanation methods shows the higher effectiveness of our approach
Explainable for Trustworthy AI
No full textBlack-box Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems for automated decision making are often based on over (big) human data, map a user’s features into a class or a score without exposing why. This is problematic for the lack of transparency and possible biases inherited by the algorithms from human prejudices and collection artefacts hidden in the training data, leading to unfair or wrong decisions. The future of AI lies in enabling people to collaborate with machines to solve complex problems. This requires good communication, trust, clarity, and understanding, like any efficient collaboration. Explainable AI (XAI) addresses such challenges, and for years different AI communities have studied such topics, leading to different definitions, evaluation protocols, motivations, and results. This chapter provides a reasoned introduction to the work of Explainable AI to date and surveys the literature focusing on symbolic AI-related approaches. We motivate the needs of XAI in real-world and large-scale applications while presenting state-of-the-art techniques and best practices and discussing the many open challenges
Counterfactual and Prototypical Explanations for Tabular Data via Interpretable Latent Space
Full text linkArtificial Intelligence decision-making systems have dramatically increased their predictive power in recent years, beating humans in many different specific tasks. However, with increased performance has come an increase in the complexity of the black-box models adopted by the AI systems, making them entirely obscure for the decision process adopted. Explainable AI is a field that seeks to make AI decisions more transparent by producing explanations. In this paper, we propose CP-ILS, a comprehensive interpretable feature reduction method for tabular data capable of generating Counterfactual and Prototypical post-hoc explanations using an Interpretable Latent Space. CP-ILS optimizes a transparent feature space whose similarity and linearity properties enable the easy extraction of local and global explanations for any pre-trained black-box model, in the form of counterfactual/prototype pairs. We evaluated the effectiveness of the created latent space by showing its capability to preserve pair-wise similarities like well-known dimensionality reduction techniques. Moreover, we assessed the quality of counterfactuals and prototypes generated with CP-ILS against state-of-the-art explainers, demonstrating that our approach obtains more robust, plausible, and accurate explanations than its competitors under most experimental conditions
Benchmarking and survey of explanation methods for black box models
Full text linkThe rise of sophisticated black-box machine learning models in Artificial Intelligence systems has prompted the need for explanation methods that reveal how these models work in an understandable way to users and decision makers. Unsurprisingly, the state-of-the-art exhibits currently a plethora of explainers providing many different types of explanations. With the aim of providing a compass for researchers and practitioners, this paper proposes a categorization of explanation methods from the perspective of the type of explanation they return, also considering the different input data formats. The paper accounts for the most representative explainers to date, also discussing similarities and discrepancies of returned explanations through their visual appearance. A companion website to the paper is provided as a continuous update to new explainers as they appear. Moreover, a subset of the most robust and widely adopted explainers, are benchmarked with respect to a repertoire of quantitative metrics
Interpretable Latent Space to Enable Counterfactual Explanations
No full textMany dimensionality reduction methods have been introduced to map a data space into one with fewer features and enhance machine learning models’ capabilities. This reduced space, called latent space, holds properties that allow researchers to understand the data better and produce better models. This work proposes an interpretable latent space that preserves the similarity of data points and supports a new way of learning a classification model that allows prediction and explanation through counterfactual examples. We demonstrate with extensive experiments the effectiveness of the latent space with respect to different metrics in comparison with several competitors, as well as the quality of the achieved counterfactual explanations
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
