1,721,128 research outputs found

    An SEIR epidemic model with constant latency time and infectious period

    No full text
    We present a two delays SEIR epidemic model with a saturation incidence rate. One delay is the time taken by the infected individuals to become infectious (i.e. capable to infect a susceptible individual), the second delay is the time taken by an infectious individual to be removed from the infection. By iterative schemes and the comparison principle, we provide global attractivity results for both the equilibria, i.e. the disease-free equilibrium E0 and the positive equilibrium E+, which exists iff the basic reproduction number R0 is larger than one. If R0>1 we also provide a permanence result for the model solutions. Finally we prove that the two delays are harmless in the sense that, by the analysis of the characteristic equations, which result to be polynomial trascendental equations with polynomial coefficients dependent upon both delays, we confirm all the standard properties of an epidemic model: E0 is locally asymptotically stable for R01, while if R0>1 then E+ is always asymptotically stable

    Lipschitz stable determination of small conductivity inclusions in a semilinear equation from boundary data

    Full text link
    We consider an inverse problem regarding the detection of small conductivity inhomogeneities in a boundary value problem for a semilinear elliptic equation. For such a problem, that is related to cardiac electrophysiology, an asymptotic expansion for the boundary potential due to the presence of small conductivity inhomogeneities was established in [4]. Starting from this we derive Lipschitz continuous dependence estimates for the corresponding inverse problem

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore