1,721,128 research outputs found
Online Database of Projects on Archaeological sites: the Pompeii Project based on its “Fortuna Visiva” Project
A new Project for the Pompeii's Superintendence Website: a Case Study. Perspectives for the Integration and On Line Publication of Digital Resources in an Institutional Repository
The relation between MRI measures of inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis
Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and measures of brain volume have been extensively applied in large-scale studies to assess disease activity and irreversible tissue damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Although histopathological studies of MS demonstrated that axonal transection occurs at sites of inflammatory changes, the correlation between brain tissue loss and gadolinium enhancement was found to be either absent or poor in virtually all in vivo MRI studies. This review discusses the reasons of this "inflammation/neurodegeneration mismatch" in MS and proposes possible strategies for a better in vivo characterization of the complex pathological process of this disease. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
New Approaches in the treatment of Digital Libraries of Monumental and Archaeological Settings to be implemented in Official Web Sites: A case study for the Portal of Italian Culture for the Ministry of Cultural Heritage
The "Fortuna Visiva of Pompeii": a sample of integration of a scientific research project into the BRICKS Project
Integration of Cultural Digital Resources in Institutional Repositories and On-line Communication through Cultural Portals. A Case Study: the Project for the Pompeii Information System and its Web Application as a Sub-Portal of the Portal of Italian Culture
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Compostaggio e digestione anaerobica della frazione organica dei rifiuti: bilanci energetici e del carbonio
- …
