894 research outputs found
Samenwerking door de bril van sociale dilemma’s
No full textBen jij je bewust van sociale dilemma’s? Hoe coöperatief stel jij je op? Je kunt jezelf deze vragen stellen, maar je kunt ‘m als conflictprofessional ook stellen aan de partijen om hen te helpen inzicht te verkrijgen in sociale dilemma’s en op basis daarvan te zoeken naar mogelijke oplossingen. Hillie Aaldering en Bianca Beersma bespreken in deze bijdrage wat een sociaal dilemma is en welke vormen sociale dilemma’s er zijn, waarom mensen meer of minder goed samenwerken in een sociaal dilemma, en op welke manier samenwerking in sociale dilemma’s bevorderd kan worden
Roddel op de werkvloer: motieven en effecten voor mensen in organisaties
No full textIn organisaties wordt heel wat afgeroddeld. Waarom doen mensen dat? En maakt het voor de gevolgen uit wat de motieven voor het roddelen zijn? Bianca Beersma laat zien dat er ook positieve kanten zitten aan roddels
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
No full textNWO 575-31-006). We thank Martin Euwema and Richta Ijntema for their assistance in collecting the data and Fieke Harinck for her helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Bianca Beersma, University of Amsterdam, Department of Psychology, Roetersstraat 15, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: ao [email protected]. 227 0749-5978/02 $35.00 # 2002 Elsevier Science (USA) All rights reserved. behaviors including competitive claiming, the use of threats and punitive capabilities, and the communication of persuasive arguments and positional commitments. However, group negotiations often have integrative potential in that one individual's gains do not equal others' losses. Group members seek to maximize joint outcomes through integrative behaviors including the exchange of information about preferences and priorities, logrolling, and the cooperative creation of value (Lax & Sebenius, 1986; Lewicki, Saunders, & M
sj-docx-1-psp-10.1177_01461672231171054 – Supplemental material for Nasty and Noble Notes: Interdependence Structures Drive Self-Serving Gossip
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-psp-10.1177_01461672231171054 for Nasty and Noble Notes: Interdependence Structures Drive Self-Serving Gossip by Terence D. Dores Cruz, Romy van der Lee, Myriam N. Bechtoldt and Bianca Beersma in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p
sj-pdf-1-hum-10.1177_00187267231165885 – Supplemental material for The double-edged sword of negative supervisor gossip: When and why negative supervisor gossip promotes versus inhibits feedback seeking behavior among gossip targets
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-hum-10.1177_00187267231165885 for The double-edged sword of negative supervisor gossip: When and why negative supervisor gossip promotes versus inhibits feedback seeking behavior among gossip targets by Qianlin Zhu, Elena Martinescu, Bianca Beersma and Feng Wei in Human Relations</p
Power to the People: Employee Empowerment in Contemporary Organizations
Full text linkBeersma, B. [Promotor]Knippenberg, D.L. van [Promotor]Sleebos, E.P. [Copromotor]Bunt, G.G. van de [Copromotor
When information about one’s counterpart matters:Prevention focus increases the impact of counterpart cues on negotiation behavior
Full text linkPurpose: To avoid (costly) conflict, it is imperative to uncover when negotiators cooperate. The previous study has shown that negotiators’ cooperative or competitive behavior is oftentimes guided by cues about their counterpart; information about his/her traits or behavior. Using regulatory focus theory, this paper aims to investigate when this is likely to happen. The authors hypothesize and test that because prevention focus (rather than promotion focus) is associated with concerns for safety and concrete surroundings, it strengthens the impact of counterpart cues. Design/methodology/approach: The authors used two scenario studies and one behavioral negotiation study to test the general hypothesis. The authors measured or manipulated participants’ regulatory focus, manipulated counterpart cues by varying the information negotiators received about their counterpart’s traits and behavior, and measured participants’ cooperative or competitive concession making behavior. Findings: Results from the studies confirmed that under prevention focus, negotiators’ cooperative behavior depended on whether they received cooperative versus competitive counterpart cues more than under promotion focus. Furthermore, results also showed that under prevention focus, negotiators’ behavior was relatively unaffected by their own social motivation – i.e. their personal goal to obtain favorable outcomes for oneself or for both negotiation parties. Originality/value: By showing that regulatory focus determines when counterpart cues affect negotiation behavior, this paper furthers the understanding of when contextual factors affect negotiators' behavior. In addition, it contributes to the understanding of the complex effects of prevention focus in interpersonal behavior.</p
Bianca Garavelli studiosa e scrittrice
No full textBianca Garavelli (Vigevano, 1958-2021) was a highly regarded figure in the literary world, both on the critical and creative side. Author of important critical studies on Dante and of a successful commentary on the Commediam (begun under the supervision of Maria Corti but then continued independently), as well as critic and reviewer for newspapers and periodicals, Garavelli also wrote and published poems, novels and short stories. This article offers an exhaustive bio-bibliographical profile of Bianca Garavelli, whose literary work in various fields is reconstructed and critically examined
Let´s (watch me) play : which factors relate to Let´s Play addiction?
No full textAuthor Bianca Haun, BScZusammenfassungen in englischer SpracheMasterarbeit Universität Linz 201
Reactie Dialoognota Ouder worden 2020-2040: Institute for Societal Resilience, Talma Instituut & Ben Sajet Centrum
No full textGezamenlijke reactie van onderzoekers van het Ben Sajet Centrum, het Institute for Societal Resilience en het Talma Instituut (laatste twee zijn onderdeel van de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) op de Dialoognota ‘Ouder worden 2020-2040’. De toekomst van de ouderenzorg is direct en indirect een thema dat in onze onderzoeksprojecten een centrale rol speelt. Zo doen wij onderzoek naar ouderen en hun woon(zorg)omgeving (Mol); informele en formele zorg voor ouderen (Broese van Groenou), de organisatie van de langdurige zorg (verpleeghuiszorg en wijkverpleging) (Beersma, Nies, Van Wieringen), de positie en inzet van zorgprofessionals in de langdurige zorg (Beersma, Nies, Van Wieringen), de besturingsvormen van de (langdurige) zorg (Bannink), de toegankelijkheid en betaalbaarheid van het stelsel (Bannink, Van der Hijden) en de bekostiging van zorg (Van der Hijden). Vanuit deze expertisegebieden reageren wij op de Dialoognota en de vragen die daarbij aan 'het veld' gesteld werden. We beschrijven tevens hoe onderzoek kan bijdragen aan het verbeteren van de ouderenzorg in de nabije toekomst en op de langere termijn
- …
