323,193 research outputs found

    Barwell - 2018 EPSL Paper

    No full text
    Barwell data published in Crowther et al. (2018) Old formation ages of igneous clasts on the L chondrite parent body reflect an early generation of planetesimals or chondrule formation, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 481, 372-386, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.10.047. Supplementary data table S1 SEM Images from Figures 3-7 and S

    Phytophthora global impacts

    No full text
    Data and code to reproduce the analysis in Barwell et al. Evolutionary trait-based approaches for predicting future global impacts of plant pathogens in the genus Phytophthor

    Edwards, Frank Barwell Frederick, [No Service Number]

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/383511Surname: EDWarDS. Given Name(s) or Initials: FRANK BARWELL FREDERICK. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: [No Registration Number]. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 30089.223158 Item: [2016.0049.15804] "Edwards, Frank Barwell Frederick, [No Service Number]

    Barwell - 2018 EPSL Paper

    No full text
    Barwell data published in Crowther et al. (2018) Old formation ages of igneous clasts on the L chondrite parent body reflect an early generation of planetesimals or chondrule formation, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 481, 372-386, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.10.047. Supplementary data table S1 SEM Images from Figures 3-7 and S

    Early I-Xe Ages of Clasts and Chondrules from the L6 Chondrite Barwell

    No full text
    Very early ages for Barwell clasts and chondrules imply they must have originated from a previous generation of planetesimals and not been altered since

    Early I-Xe Ages of Clasts and Chondrules from the L6 Chondrite Barwell

    No full text
    Very early ages for Barwell clasts and chondrules imply they must have originated from a previous generation of planetesimals and not been altered since

    Early I-Xe Ages of Clasts and Chondrules from the L6 Chondrite Barwell

    No full text
    Very early ages for Barwell clasts and chondrules imply they must have originated from a previous generation of planetesimals and not been altered since

    Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)

    No full text
    This study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore