1,721,905 research outputs found

    A. Baldit. — Météorologie du relief terrestre

    No full text
    Fischer Jean. A. Baldit. — Météorologie du relief terrestre. In: Les Études rhodaniennes, vol. 6, n°3, 1930. p. 348

    La Commission Météorologique départementale du Rhone. Son état actuel et son avenir.

    No full text
    Baldit Albert. La Commission Météorologique départementale du Rhone. Son état actuel et son avenir.. In: Les Études rhodaniennes, vol. 5, n°1, 1929. pp. 149-154

    Albert Baldit, Orages, grêle et foudre dans la Haute-Loire

    No full text
    Allix André. Albert Baldit, Orages, grêle et foudre dans la Haute-Loire. In: Les Études rhodaniennes, vol. 10, n°1-2, 1934. p. 100

    Sur un effet de ravinement produit par la pluie au bas d'une pente

    No full text
    Baldit Albert. Sur un effet de ravinement produit par la pluie au bas d'une pente. In: Les Études rhodaniennes, vol. 11, n°3, 1935. pp. 367-370

    Da Rocha 2026 model used for Wharton's jelly damage mechanical characterisation

    No full text
    Python implementation of the Da Rocha 2026 model used for Wharton's jelly damage mechanical characterisation. This code aims to reproduce the non-linear behaviour up to failure of soft biological tissues undergoing monotonic load.Da Rocha, A., Lavrand, A., Cavinato, C., Laurent, C., Mauprivez, C., Kerdjoudj, H., Po, C., Baldit, A., 2026. Macro-scale damage characterization of Wharton’s jelly membrane undergoing tension. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 174, 107236

    Le tireur d'élite : roman / Daniel Baldit

    No full text
    Contient une table des matièresAvec mode text

    Comparaison d'un nivomètre Mougin à lecture annuelle avec un pluviomètre association à lecture journalière au poste météorologique du Puy-en-Velay (altitude 715 m.)

    No full text
    Baldit Albert, Gilbert J., Philibert R., Fayel L. Comparaison d'un nivomètre Mougin à lecture annuelle avec un pluviomètre association à lecture journalière au poste météorologique du Puy-en-Velay (altitude 715 m.). In: Les Études rhodaniennes, vol. 15, n°1-3, 1939. pp. 11-17

    Annulus fibrosus microstructure: an explanation to local heterogeneities

    No full text
    International audienceAnnulus fibrosus (AF) is the outer tissue ofintervertebral discs (IVD). Its peculiarmicrostructure and biphasic composition define byan oriented fibre network embedded in a highlyhydrated matrix (60−70%) is usually assimilated toporous composite material. It confers to AF a nonlinear,viscous and anisotropic behaviour.Many experimental and numerical studiesunderlined the anisotropic and non-linearmechanical behaviours on averaged values[Ambard and Cherblanc, 2009; Malandrino et al,2011] but fail to represent the experimental strainheterogeneities [Baldit et al, 2013a; Michalek et al,2010], that would be related to the microstructureand the biphasic constitution. On the other hand,characterization rarely relies on volumic behaviorbut it’s relevant when models deal with soft porousmedia [Baldit et al, 2013b].This work aims to couple a poro-hyper-elasticmodel identification with homogenized anddiscretized geometries highlighting modelsensitivity and limits regarding experimentaltransverse strains measurements

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore