1,720,976 research outputs found
Names and Identities [Nevek és identitások]
Full text linkSzerkesztők: Botolv Helleland - Christian Emil Ore - Solveig Wikstrøm. Oslo Studies in Language 4. (2). University of Oslo, 2012. 288 la
Stadnamnarkivet hundre år
Full text linkThe Norwegian Place Name Archive (Norsk stadnamnarkiv) was founded in 1921. The aim of the archive was to register place names in written sources and gather the pronunciation of names on maps, in addition to the full documentation of place names in certain areas. In addition to documentation, research and publication have been important parts of the archive’s work. Teaching and courses in collection of place names were also conducted. Starting in the 1970s, the archive has organized or contributed to onomastic conferences, nationally and internationally. The place name archive was located first in Oslo, from 1930–42 mainly in Bergen, then in Oslo again. The government was responsible for the archive starting in 1939, and it became a separate institute at the University of Oslo in 1978. In 2016 the onomastic collections were transferred to the University of Bergen, where they became part of the Norwegian Language Collections at Bergen University Library
Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Onomastic Sciences : Uppsala, 19-24 August 2002 /
No full text"Vol. 3 edited in collaboration with Rob Rentenaar ; vol. 4 edited in collaboration with Dieter Kremer and Botolv Helleland"Nom propi d'auqetsa conferència: Names in language and society. Cf. Pref., v. 1, p. [ix].Textos en anglès, francès i alemany.Referències bibliogràfiques
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
