1,721,181 research outputs found
Metal-based optical chemosensors for CN− detection
No full textThis critical review focuses on recent advances (2010-2015) in the detection of cyanide anion via metal-based optical chemosensors in which a change in colour and/or fluorescence intensity (or emission wavelength) of a molecular metal complex is determined by the direct interaction of the metal centre with this anio
Intrinsic and environmental effects in the structure and magnetic properties of organic molecular magnets: Bis(imino)nitroxide
No full textTHEORETICAL-STUDY OF THE ELECTRONIC-STRUCTURE AND OF THE MERCURY-CARBON BONDING OF METHYLMERCURY(II) COMPOUNDS
No full text
Comparison between post-Hartree-Fock and DFT methods for the study of strength and mechanism of cleavage of Hg-C bond
No full text, DFT DESCRIPTION OF THE MAGNETIC PROPERTIES AND ELECTRON TRANSFER IN DINUCLEAR DI-M-OXO BRIDGED MANGANESE COMPLEXES
No full textRelazione fra qualità delle acque di sottosuolo, vulnerabilità delle falde ed ubicazione dei centri di pericolo nel bacino Firenze-Pistoia
No full textViene presentato uno studio sulla relazione fra grado di protezione all'inquinamento del primo acquifero, distribuzione in falda di inquinanti di origine antropica (nitriti, nitrati, organo-clorurati) ed uso del territorio nella pianura alluvionale del Valdarno Medi
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
