530 research outputs found
Seyahat Acentalarının Turist Rehberlerine Yönelik Şikâyetleri Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma
No full textBu çalışmanın amacı seyahat acentalarının gerçekleştirdikleri tur organizasyonlarında profesyonel turist rehberlerine ilişkin yaşadıkları ve sorun olarak niteledikleri durumların araştırılmasıdır. Bu kapsamda turlarda birlikte çalıştıkları profesyonel turist rehberlerine ilişkin şikayetler irdelenmiştir. Çalışma, tur öncesi, tur anı ve tur sonrası olarak üç kısımda şikayetleri ele alarak yapılan görüşmeleri içerik analizine tabi tutmuştur. Toplamda 24 adet seyahat acentası ile görüşme yapılmıştır. Seyahat acentaları, Safranbolu bölgesine tur ya da paket tur düzenleyen ve Türk turistlere hizmet veren acentalar arasından kartopu örneklem yöntemi uyarınca seçilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonucunda tur öncesi en çok son dakika tur iptali sebebi ile seyahat acentalarının mağdur duruma düştüğü gözlenmiştir. Tur anında, turun gerçekleştiği destinasyona hakim olmama, anlatım yapmaya istekli olmama ve şahsi menfaat merkezli davranışlar seyahat acentalarını zor durumda bıraktığı belirtilmiştir. Tur sonrasında ise seyahat acentası ile ilgili olumsuz intiba bırakacak söylemler konusunda sıkıntı yaşandığı katılımcılar tarafından belirtilmiştir
Transcription and evaluation of "A[DVNS-ŞHB.d (1899-1900/H.1317)] Şehbenderlik Defteri no:2"
No full textBu tezde, Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi, Bab-ı Asafi Divan-ı Hümayun Sicilleri Şehbenderlik Defterleri, 2 Numaralı Şehbenderlik Defteri'nin transkripsiyonu, özetlendirilmesi ve değerlendirilmesi yapılmıştır. Osmanlı diplomasi tarihinin önemli kaynaklarından olan Şehbenderlik Defterleri, Hariciye Nezareti bünyesinde, Osmanlı Devleti'nin dış ülkelere gönderdiği şehbenderler, şehbender vekilleri, başşehbenderler, başşehbender vekilleri, fahri başşehbenderler, fahri şehbenderler ve tüccar vekillerinin atamalarının kayıtlarını içerir. Şehbenderlik Defterleri 3 adettir ve 1802 (H. 1217) ile 1911 (H. 1339) yılları arasının kayıtlarını içermektedir. 2 Numaralı Şehbenderlik Defteri, 1890 ve 1899 yılları arasında Osmanlı Devleti'nin hangi ülkeler ile diplomatik ve ticari ilişkiler içerisinde olduğu,defter dahilindeki ülkelerin hangi şehirlerinde faaliyet gösterildiği, hangi yeni şehbenderliklerin açıldığı ve memurların kimler olduğu gibi önemli bilgileri ortaya koymaktadır. Mevcut Şehbenderlik Defterleri'nde yer alan bilgiler, Osmanlı Devleti'nin diplomatik ve ticarî ilişkilerinin daha detaylı bir şekilde incelenmesine olanak vermesi açısından önem arz etmektedir
PENERAPAN HAK RECALL OLEH PARTAI KEADILAN SEJAHTERA (PKS) TERHADAP FAHRI HAMZAH MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG MPR, DPR, DPD DAN DPRD UNDANG-UNDANG (MD3)
No full textThis study discusses the dismissal of Fahri Hamzah by the Prosperous
Justice Party, where the case caused internal party disputes and was included
in the Articles of Association and Bylaws of the Prosperous Justice Party
(PKS). An interesting problem to study is the background of the reason why
PKS applied the recall right to Fahri Hamzah which resulted in his dismissal
according to the decision of the South Jakarta District Court Number
214/Pdt.G/2016/PN.JKT.Sel.
In writing this research, the author uses library research methods,
which are obtained from various sources, laws and regulations and related
literature from research with a juridical approach. This research is
descriptive-analytical, namely research by collecting data and facts, then
describing, classifying and analyzing.
The results of this study explain that first, the reason for Fahri
Hamzah's recall is to violate DPR Regulation Number 1 of 2015 concerning
the DPR's Code of Ethics Article 2, Article 3 paragraph (4), Article 5
paragraph (1), Article 11 paragraph (2); the mekanism of PKS recall rights to
Fahri Hamzah is considered to have been in accordance with the party’s
AS/ART especially Article 26 paragraph (3
Tinjauan maslahah dan teori politik hukum terhadap putusan Mahkamah Agung nomor 1876/k/pdt/2018 tentang pemecatan Fahri Hamzah oleh Partai Politik
No full textIndonesia :
Penelitian ini, peneliti menyajikan penelitian tentang Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1876 K/Pdt/2018 dalam kasus pemecatan Fahri Hamzah sebagai anggota Legislatif oleh partai PKS. Pada kasus ini Fahri Hamzah dipecat keanggotaannya oleh partai PKS karena telah melanggar AD/ART partai. Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2011 menjelaskan anggota bisa dipecat apabila melanggar AD/ART partai. Tetapi pada kasus pemecatan Fahri Hamzah ini tidak dijelaskan AD/ART mana yang telah dilanggar oleh Fahri Hamzah kemudian terjadi sengketa antara Fahmi Hamzah dengan Partai PKS. Setelah sampai tahap kasasi yang sebelumnya melalui Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan dan banding di Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Jakarta , akhirnya Mahkamah Agung mengeluarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1876 K/Pdt/2018. Penulis menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1876 K/Pdt/2018 dari segi Maslahah sebagai penghubung kemaslahatan negara dan agama juga dari segi teori politik hukum.
Jenis penelitian yang digunakan oleh penulis adalah penelitian normatif. Penulis meneliti dengan bahan hukum Undang-Undang, Putusan-Putusan, Buku serta jurnal dalam mengumpulkan data yang diperlukan selama penelitian. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pertimbangan-pertimbangan hakim dalam mengeluarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1876 K/Pdt/2018 serta mengetahui tinjauan Maslahah dan teori politik hukum terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1876 K/Pdt/2018.
Dari Hasil Penelitian, pertimbangan hakim dalam mengeluarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1876 K/Pdt/2018 yakni mempertahankan hak-hak Fahri Hamzah sebagai anggota legislatif dan juga sebagai warga negara atas kesewenangan pemecatan oleh partai PKS sebagai bentuk penegakkan keadilan. Secara Maslahah Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1876 K/Pdt/2018 ini dikeluarkan demi kemaslahatan demi kepentingan umum dan mencegah mudharat-mudharat yang lain
Arab :
في هذه الدراسة ، يعرض المؤلف بحثًا حول قرار المحكمة العليا رقم 1876 K / PDT / 2018 في قضية إقالة حزب PKS فهري حمزة كعضو في الهيئة التشريعية. في هذه الحالة ، تم طرد فهري حمزة من عضويته من قبل حزب PKS لأنه انتهك قانون النظام الأساسي / الميزانيات الخاص بالحزب. يوضح القانون رقم 2 لعام 2011 أنه يمكن فصل الأعضاء إذا انتهكوا النظام الأساسي / الميزانيات.الخاص بالحزب. ومع ذلك ، في حالة إقالة فهري حمزة ، لم يتم توضيح ما هو النظام الأساسي/ الميزانيات قد انتهك من قبل فهري حمزة ، ثم وقع نزاع بين فهمي حمزة وحزب PKS. بعد الوصول إلى مرحلة النقض التي كانت في السابق من خلال محكمة مقاطعة جاكرتا الجنوبية والاستئناف أمام محكمة DKI جاكرتا العليا ، أصدرت المحكمة العليا أخيرًا قرار المحكمة العليا رقم 1876 K / PDT / 2018 . يحلل المؤلف قرار المحكمة العليا رقم 1876 K / PDT / 2018 من حيث المصلحة كحلقة وصل لصالح الدولة والدين وكذلك من حيث النظرية السياسية القانونية.
نوع البحث الذي يستخدمه المؤلف هو بحث معياري. يرغب المؤلف في البحث بالمواد القانونية مثل القوانين والقرارات والكتب والمجلات في جمع البيانات اللازمة أثناء البحث. الغرض من هذا البحث هو معرفة اعتبارات القضاة في إصدار قرار المحكمة العليا رقم 1876 K / PDT / 2018 ومعرفة مراجعة مصلحة خالصة من النظرية السياسية القانونية ضد قرار المحكمة العليا رقم 1876 K / PDT / 2018.
من نتائج الدراسة ، كان اعتبار القاضي في إصدار قرار المحكمة العليا رقم 1876 K / PDT / 2018 هو الدفاع عن حقوق فهري حمزة كعضو في الهيئة التشريعية وأيضًا كمواطن للفصل التعسفي من قبل حزب PKS شكل من أشكال دعم العدالة. صالحه صدر قرار المحكمة العليا رقم 1876 K / PDT / 2018 لصالح الجمهور ولمنع الأضرار.
Inggris :
In this study, the author presents research on the Supreme Court's Decision Number 1876 K/Pdt/2018 in the case of the dismissal of Fahri Hamzah as a member of the Legislature by the PKS party. In this case, Fahri Hamzah was dismissed from his membership by the PKS party because he had violated the party's AD/ART. Law Number 2 of 2011 explains that members can be fired if they violate the party's AD/ART. However, in the case of Fahri Hamzah's dismissal, it was not explained which AD/ART had been violated by Fahri Hamzah, then a dispute occurred between Fahmi Hamzah and the PKS Party. After reaching the cassation stage which was previously through the South Jakarta District Court and an appeal at the DKI Jakarta High Court, the Supreme Court finally issued Supreme Court Decision Number 1876 K/Pdt/2018. The author analyzes the Supreme Court Decision Number 1876 K/Pdt/2018 in terms of Maslahah as a liaison for the benefit of the state and religion as well as in terms of Legal Political Theory.
The type of research used by the author is normative research. The author wishes to research with legal materials such as laws, decisions, books and journals in collecting the necessary data during the research. The purpose of this research is to find out the judges' considerations in issuing the Supreme Court Decision Number 1876 K/Pdt/2018 and to find out Maslahah's review and Legal Political Theory against the Supreme Court's Decision Number 1876 K/Pdt/2018.
From the results of the study, the judge's consideration in issuing the Supreme Court Decision Number 1876 K/Pdt/2018 was to defend Fahri Hamzah's rights as a member of the legislature and also as a citizen of the arbitrary dismissal by the PKS party as a form of upholding justice. Maslahah The Supreme Court Decision Number 1876 K/Pdt/2018 was issued for the benefit of the public and to prevent other harms
- …
