1,721,045 research outputs found

    La potestà regolamentare nel Lazio

    No full text
    Pubblicazione frutto del lavoro di ricerca finanziata Prin 2007 e Sspal diretta dal Prof. B. Caravita di TorittoPublication of the result of the research work funded Prin 2007 SSPAL directed by Prof. B. Caravita Toritt

    Beni paesaggistici

    No full text
    Nel capitolo XVIII del volume l'autore ricostruisce la disciplina normativa in materia di beni paesaggistici a partire dal 1939, passando attraverso il testo unico del 1999 e fino ad arrivare all'attuale "codice dei beni culturali e del paesaggio", approvato nel 2004 e sottoposto, a più riprese, a modifiche ed integrazioni.In this chapter on "landscape assets" the author reconstructs the related legislative framework since 1939, as well as the text of 1999 to the current "code of cultural and landscape heritage" approved in 2004 and subsequently amended and extended

    Recensione a B. Caravita e altri, A centocinquant'anni da Roma capitale. Costruire il futuro della Città eterna, Soveria Mannelli, Rubbettino, 2020

    No full text
    Recensione del volume del prof. B. Caravita e altri dal titolo "A centocinquant'anni da Roma capitale. Costruire il futuro della città eterna", avente ad oggetto la riforma dell'ordinamento di Roma

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore