1,720,955 research outputs found
Model Pengukuran Kinerja Keuangan Dan Sosial-Ekonomi Pada Perbankan Syariah
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis berbagai metode pengukuran kinerja bank
syariah dan berbagai model alternatifnya serta memformulasi model pengukuran kinerja yang
relevan dengan hakikat, filosofi, dan tujuan bank syariah. Hal ini untuk menjawab gap besar
penelitian dimana perbankan syariah saat ini belum memiliki alat ukur kinerja standar yang
sesuai dan relevan dengan tujuannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode Operasionalisasi
Konsep Sekaran (SCOM) dan Analytical Network Process (ANP). Indeks Kinerja Keuangan
dan Sosial-Ekonomi sebagai hasil model pengukuran kinerja kemudian digunakan untuk
mengevaluasi pencapaian kinerja serta melakukan pemeringkatan (rating) kinerja Bank Umum
Syariah (BUS). Hasil penelitian ini menetapkan Konstruk Kinerja Bank Syariah dan Bangunan
Indeks Kinerja Keuangan dan Sosial-Ekonomi Bank Syariah beserta bobotnya masing-masing,
yaitu: Kinerja Keuangan (0,40), Kinerja Ekonomi (0,30), dan Kinerja Sosial (0,30). Variabel
utama untuk Kinerja Keuangan dengan bobot tertinggi secara berurutan yaitu: Pertumbuhan
Pembiayaan, Pertumbuhan Pendanaan atau DPK, Profitabilitas, Efisiensi, Likuiditas,
Permodalan, dan Kualitas Aset. Variabel untuk Kinerja Ekonomi mencakup: Peringkat Nilai
GCG, Proporsi Pembiayaan UMKM, Proporsi Pembiayaan Berbasis Bagi Hasil, Peringkat
Profil Manajemen Risiko, Peningkatan Skala Ekonomi, Pelaksanaan Fungsi Investasi atau
DPK Berbasis Bagi Hasil, dan Kontribusi Pajak. Variabel untuk Kinerja Sosial antara lain:
Penyaluran Dana Zakat, Kontribusi Pelaksanaan Fungsi Sosial, Alokasi Peningkatan Kapasitas
SDI, Penyaluran Dana Kebajikan, Alokasi untuk Riset dan Pengembangan, Alokasi Fungsi
Edukasi dan Sosialisasi, dan Kontribusi Pembiayaan Qard. Hasil aplikasi perhitungan kinerja
dua belas bank syariah dengan Indeks Kinerja Keuangan dan Sosial-Ekonomi dalam periode
lima tahun secara umum menunjukkan kinerja bank syariah mayoritas dalam predikat bagus
dan sangat bagus. Penelitian ini telah memberikan kontribusi teoritis terkait Konstruk Kinerja
Bank Syariah dan kontribusi metodologis dalam bentuk Indeks Kinerja Keuangan dan Sosial-
Ekonomi Bank Syariah baru untuk mengukur kinerja bank syariah dengan 21 variabel yang
dapat digunakan dan dikembangkan peneliti berikutnya
Recent Development of Islamic Banking Performance Measurement
This study aims to review the development of research related to Islamic banks' performance measurement and various alternative models. It uses a meta-analysis approach to identify other previous studies from various journals and relevant researches. The results show that the measurement of Islamic bank performance mostly uses financial performance measurements similar to conventional bank performance measurements, which use financial ratios and efficiency. There have been several serious efforts to develop alternative models for measuring Islamic banks' performance to reflect their nature and objectives better. These models include the Islamicity Index, Economic Contribution and Muslim Communities, Social Performance Index, Maqashid Index, and Islamic Bank Maqashid Index. However, eventually, these models are still in the early stages of development and have several weaknesses. Thus, it is still necessary to develop a model for measuring Islamic bank performance relevant to its philosophy and objectives
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
