5,698 research outputs found
Surtees & Apperly 2012 Stims
No full textStimuli for:
Surtees, Andrew DR, and Ian A. Apperly. "Egocentrism and automatic perspective taking in children and adults." Child development 83.2 (2012): 452-460.
https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01730.x?casa_token=fUbD7mPtCZEAAAAA%3AsTwyusSukbHXthlCYbBVVJDDoKvk96q9epIhE2NtTNqh7BOW8JawOZm0aTDpzmkCwHufZFwFJPrXnO
Surtees & Apperly 2012 Stims
No full textStimuli for:
Surtees, Andrew DR, and Ian A. Apperly. "Egocentrism and automatic perspective taking in children and adults." Child development 83.2 (2012): 452-460.
https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01730.x?casa_token=fUbD7mPtCZEAAAAA%3AsTwyusSukbHXthlCYbBVVJDDoKvk96q9epIhE2NtTNqh7BOW8JawOZm0aTDpzmkCwHufZFwFJPrXnO
Cognitive architecture of belief reasoning in children and adults : a two-systems account primer
Get PDFCharacterizing the cognitive architecture of human mindreading forces us to address two puzzles in people’s attributions of belief: why children show inconsistent expectations about others’ belief-based actions, and why adults’ belief reasoning is sometimes automatic and sometimes not. The seemingly puzzling data suggest humans have multiple mindreading systems that use different models of the mental. The efficient system is shared by infants, children and adults, and uses a minimal model of mind, which enables belief-like states to be tracked. The flexible system is late-developing and uses a canonical model, which incorporates propositional attitudes. A given model’s operation has signature limits that produce performance contrasts, in children as well as adults, between certain types of mindreading tasks
Defining key concepts for mental state attribution
No full textThe article processing charge was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 491192747 and the Open Access Publication Fund of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. All authors: François Quesque, Ian Apperly, Renée Baillargeon, Simon Baron-Cohen, Cristina Becchio, Harold Bekkering, Daniel Bernstein, Maxime Bertoux, Geoffrey Bird, Henryk Bukowski, Pascal Burgmer, Peter Carruthers, Caroline Catmur, Isabel Dziobek, Nicholas Epley, Thorsten Michael Erle, Chris Frith, Uta Frith, Carl Michael Galang, Vittorio Gallese, Delphine Grynberg, Francesca Happé, Masahiro Hirai, Sara D. Hodges, Philipp Kanske, Mariska Kret, Claus Lamm, Jean Louis Nandrino, Sukhvinder Obhi, Sally Olderbak, Josef Perner, Yves Rossetti, Dana Schneider, Matthias Schurz, Tobias Schuwerk, Natalie Sebanz, Simone Shamay-Tsoory, Giorgia Silani, Shannon Spaulding, Andrew R. Todd, Evan Westra, Dan Zahavi & Marcel BrassPeer Reviewe
sj-docx-2-pss-10.1177_09567976211017870 – Supplemental material for Sources of Cognitive Conflict and Their Relevance to Theory-of-Mind Proficiency in Healthy Aging: A Preregistered Study
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-2-pss-10.1177_09567976211017870 for Sources of Cognitive Conflict and Their Relevance to Theory-of-Mind Proficiency in Healthy Aging: A Preregistered Study by Foyzul Rahman, Klaus Kessler, Ian A. Apperly, Peter C. Hansen, Sabrina Javed, Carol A. Holland and Charlotte E. Hartwright in Psychological Science</p
sj-docx-1-pss-10.1177_09567976211017870 – Supplemental material for Sources of Cognitive Conflict and Their Relevance to Theory-of-Mind Proficiency in Healthy Aging: A Preregistered Study
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-pss-10.1177_09567976211017870 for Sources of Cognitive Conflict and Their Relevance to Theory-of-Mind Proficiency in Healthy Aging: A Preregistered Study by Foyzul Rahman, Klaus Kessler, Ian A. Apperly, Peter C. Hansen, Sabrina Javed, Carol A. Holland and Charlotte E. Hartwright in Psychological Science</p
Error analyses reveal contrasting deficits in “theory of mind”: neuropsychological evidence from a 3-option false belief task
Get PDFPerspective taking is a crucial ability that guides our social interactions. In this study, we show how the specific patterns of errors of brain-damaged patients in perspective taking tasks can help us further understand the factors contributing to perspective taking abilities. Previous work (e.g., Samson, Apperly, Chiavarino, & Humphreys, 2004; Samson, Apperly, Kathirgamanathan, & Humphreys, 2005) distinguished two components of perspective taking: the ability to inhibit our own perspective and the ability to infer someone else’s perspective. We assessed these components using a new nonverbal false belief task which provided different response options to detect three types of response strategies that participants might be using: a complete and spared belief reasoning strategy, a reality-based response selection strategy in which participants respond from their own perspective, and a simplified mentalising strategy in which participants avoid responding from their own perspective but rely on inaccurate cues to infer the other person’s belief. One patient, with a self-perspective inhibition deficit, almost always used the reality-based response strategy; in contrast, the other patient, with a deficit in taking other perspectives, tended to use the simplified mentalising strategy without necessarily transposing her own perspective. We discuss the extent to which the pattern of performance of both patients could relate to their executive function deficit and how it can inform us on the cognitive and neural components involved in belief reasoning
Author interview: Q and A with Dr Ian Sanjay Patel on we’re here because you were there: immigration and the end of empire
No full textIn this author interview, we speak to Dr Ian Sanjay Patel about his new book, We’re Here Because You Were There: Immigration and the End of Empire, which explores post-war immigration laws, the afterlives of British imperial citizenship and related attempts to reimagine and rejuvenate British imperialism after 1945. Contributing to transnational histories of decolonisation, the book also explores the interconnections between human rights, post-war migration and international diplomacy. Author Interview with Dr Ian Sanjay Patel, author of We’re Here Because You Were There: Immigration and the End of Empire. Verso. 2021
Level 1 Visual Perspective-Taking Task
No full text<p>The material uploaded here are the stimuli and methods used in the following paper:</p>
<p>Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1255–66. doi:10.1037/a0018729</p
- …
