1,720,964 research outputs found
RUSH: A Novel Fully AI-driven Framework for Seamless Integration of Observations and Global AI Forecasts in Short-term Weather Prediction
Precipitation nowcasting with generative diffusion models
In recent years traditional numerical methods for accurate weather prediction have been increasingly challenged by deep learning methods. Numerous historical datasets used for short and medium-range weather forecasts are typically organized into a regular spatial grid structure. This arrangement closely resembles images: each weather variable can be visualized as a map or, when considering the temporal axis, as a video. Several classes of generative models, comprising Generative Adversarial Networks, Variational Autoencoders, or the recent Denoising Diffusion Models have largely proved their applicability to the next-frame prediction problem, and is thus natural to test their performance on the weather prediction benchmarks. Diffusion models are particularly appealing in this context, due to the intrinsically probabilistic nature of weather forecasting: what we are really interested to model is the probability distribution of weather indicators, whose expected value is the most likely prediction. In our study, we focus on a specific subset of the ERA-5 dataset, which includes hourly data pertaining to Central Europe from the years 2016 to 2021. Within this context, we examine the efficacy of diffusion models in handling the task of precipitation nowcasting, with a lead time of 1 to 3 hours. Our work is conducted in comparison to the performance of well-established U-Net models, as documented in the existing literature. An additional comparative analysis has been done with the forecasting capabilities of the CERRA system, part of the Copernicus Climate Change Service. The novelty of our approach, Generative Ensemble Diffusion (GED), lies in its innovative use of a diffusion model to generate a diverse set of possible weather scenarios. These scenarios are then amalgamated into a single prediction in a post-processing phase. This approach mimics the usual weather forecasting technique consisting in running an ensemble of numerical simulations under slightly different initial conditions by exploiting instead the intrinsic stochasticity of the generative model. In comparison to recent deep learning models addressing the same problem, our approach results in approximately a 25% reduction in the mean squared error. Reverse diffusion is a core concept in our GED approach, is particularly relevant to weather forecasting. In the context of diffusion models, reverse diffusion refers to the process of iteratively refining a noisy initial prediction into a coherent and realistic forecast. By leveraging reverse diffusion, our model effectively simulates the complex temporal dynamics of weather systems, mirroring the inherent uncertainty and variability in weather patterns
Caratteristiche principali dell'emissione di galassie ellittiche
Elaborato finale sulle caratteristiche principali dell'emissione di galassie ellittiche, con brevi descrizioni dei principali meccanismi emissivi e delle leggi fondamentali su questo tipo di galassie
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Assessing the turbulent pressure in galaxy clusters
The amount of turbulent pressure support from residual gas motions at the periphery of galaxy clusters is not well known. In this work, we tested different choices for the filtering of laminar and bulk gas motions from simulated datasets, and we produced new analysis of turbulence in galaxy clusters with a large catalog of cluster simulations. In particular, we have explored the application of different filtering scales for the velocity field, exploring the range from 60 to 600 kiloparsec, in order to disentangle laminar from turbulent motions. We also apply a tailored shocks finding algorithm to minimise their contribution to the estimated turbulent budget. We study the ratio of non-thermal pressure versus total pressure and its radial behavior, finding that it is well described by a simple polynomial formula. The typical non-thermal pressure support we measured in the center of cluster is 3%, while this reaches 10% in the outskirts. We have also compared our results with recent numerical and observational literature. In particular, we found that the different definition of turbulent velocity generates very different amount of turbulent support. As we also discussed in a related paper, the fitting procedure which we used is more statistically significant than the ones presented in literature. Our results allow us to compare with recent observations, and assess which turbulent spatial scale best reproduces the observed trends. We also studied the relations between non-thermal support and cluster’s mass or dynamical state. In particular, our tests have shown that there are not any strong correlations between these quantities. We conclude that our no complete mass selection of the sample affect the study of any possible correlation. Some of the key results of this Thesis are already part of a work which is submitted and will be further documented in a dedicated scientific paper
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
