1,721,992 research outputs found

    Andrew Martin Smith Oral History Interview

    No full text
    An oral history with Andrew Martin Smith, a gay librarian and genealogist. He spoke about growing up in South Carolina and his process of realization and coming out as a gay man after graduating from Clemson University. He talked about starting at the University of South Florida and teaching students on how to use the internet. Smith spoke about how he met his partner and spouse, George Morgan

    Talk About the North Andrew Martin

    No full text
    Andrew Martin - Railways, the North & the condition of England

    Martin, Andrew - Estate of Andrew Martin, deceased

    Full text link
    Envelope for probate records of Andrew Martin, deceasedhttps://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/lantern-hnf/1392/thumbnail.jp

    Andrew Martin Receptions of War. Vietnam in American Culture

    No full text
    Portes Jacques. Andrew Martin Receptions of War. Vietnam in American Culture. In: Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales. 55ᵉ année, N. 1, 2000. pp. 194-195

    Andrew Martin Berry photograph

    No full text
    This photograph from the Ohio Penitentiary in Columbus is of 44-year-old Andrew Berry. His formal attire suggests that the photograph was taken during his trial or sentencing. Berry was the 269th individual to be executed via the electric chair in Ohio. The caption at the bottom reads: “No. 269 Andrew Martin Berry of Lucas County, Legally Electrocuted April 29, 1949 for the Murder of Emanuel E. Watkins.” In 1885 the Ohio Penitentiary in Columbus, Ohio, became the location for all executions, which previously took place in the various county seats. In 1896 the Ohio General Assembly mandated that electrocution replace hanging as the form of capital punishment. The Ohio Penitentiary regularly offered tours as well as souvenir photographs and postcards of the building and prisoners on death row. A total of 315 prisoners, both men and women, were executed in the electric chair known as “Old Sparky” between 1897 and 1963

    Andrew Martin: Regulation of Federal Government Lawyers

    No full text
    Join Moira and Andrew Martin, Assistant Professor at the Schulich School of Law, as they discuss his recent paper in the DLJ: “The Implications of Federalism for the Regulation of Federal Government Lawyers” Andrew discusses the potential for either a law society for federal government lawyers or a requirement that federal government lawyers be licensed in at least one province. Andrew also explains some of the nuances around restricting activism for government lawyers. You can read Andrew\u27s article here: Andrew Flavelle Martin, The Implications of Federalism for the Regulation of Federal Government Lawyers (2020) 43:1 Dal LJ 363

    Designing kinetic objects for digital information display

    Full text link
    Thesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Media Arts & Sciences, 1998.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 51-53).Andrew Martin Dahley.M.S

    Martin, Andrew -Order for inventory and appraisement of the estate of Andrew Martin, deceased

    Full text link
    Order for the inventory and appraisement of the estate of Andrew Martin, deceased, including six enslaved persons: David, 32 years; Joice, 24 years; Celia, 18 years; Charles, 8 years; Esther, 6 years, and Jane, 2 yearshttps://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/lantern-hnf/1393/thumbnail.jp

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore