1,720,981 research outputs found
Und der Zukunft zugewandt: Rezension zu "Handbuch Geschichte der deutschsprachigen Soziologie. Band 1-3" von Stephan Moebius, Andrea Ploder, Nicole Holzhauser und Oliver Römer (Hg.)
Full text linkStephan Moebius, Andrea Ploder (Hrsg): Handbuch Geschichte der deutschsprachigen Soziologie. Bd. 1: Geschichte der Soziologie im deutschsprachigen Raum. Wiesbaden: Springer VS 2018. 978-3-658-07613-9.+++Stephan Moebius, Andrea Ploder (Hrsg.): Handbuch Geschichte der deutschsprachigen Soziologie. Bd. 2: Forschungsdesign, Theorien und Methoden. Wiesbaden: Springer VS 2017. 978-3-658-07607-8.+++Nicole Holzhauser, Andrea Ploder, Stephan Moebius, Oliver Römer (Hrsg.): Handbuch Geschichte der deutschsprachigen Soziologie. Bd. 3: Zeittafel. Wiesbaden: Springer VS 2019. 978-3-658-19986-9
Reseña: Andrea Ploder (2014). Qualitative Forschung als strenge Wissenschaft? [¿Investigación cualitativa como ciencia rigurosa?]
No full textDie Studie "Qualitative Sozialforschung als strenge Wissenschaft?" richtet sich auf die Rezeption Edmund HUSSERLs in der deutschsprachigen Methoden- und Methodologienliteratur in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Wie die Autorin zeigt, ist die HUSSERL-Lektüre hochgradig von Alfred SCHÜTZ geprägt, ohne aber in ihr aufzugehen, da sie auch auf Originaltexte rekurriert. Diese Lektüre wird hier anhand von a priori festgelegten Untersuchungskriterien wie adäquat, modifizierend, affirmativ etc. danach untersucht, wie gründlich sie verlief und welche Potenziale der Originaltexte dabei verschenkt wurden. Das Ergebnis der Untersuchung ist wichtig, da "Verstehen" ein Leitbegriff der qualitativen Sozialforschung ist.URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs160119The study "Qualitative Forschung als strenge Wissenschaft?" [Qualitative Research as Rigorous Science?] critically examines the reception history of Edmund HUSSERL in the German methodological literature of qualitative social research. The book argues that HUSSERL's phenomenology penetrated qualitative research literature predominantly through the work of Alfred SCHÜTZ, although HUSSERL's original work was directly received too. Using a set of defined, a priori criteria, Andrea PLODER carefully plots whether or not HUSSERL's ideas were absorbed. With this study, Andrea PLODER addresses a relevant problem, because understanding (Verstehen) is paradigmatic in qualitative research.URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs160119El estudio "Qualitative Forschung als strenge Wissenschaft?" [¿Investigación Cualitativa como Ciencia Rigurosa?] examina críticamente la historia de recepción de la obra de Edmund HUSSERL en la literatura metodológica alemana de la investigación social cualitativa. El libro argumenta que la fenomenología de HUSSERL ingresó en la literatura sobre investigación cualitativa predominantemente a través del trabajo de Alfred SHÜTZ, si bien la obra original de HUSSERL fue recibida también de manera directa. Utilizando una serie de criterios definidos a priori, Andrea PLODER plantea cuidadosamente si las ideas de HUSSERL fueron o no asimiladas. Con este estudio, Andrea PLODER aborda un problema relevante, ya que la comprensión (Verstehen) es paradigmática en la investigación cualitativa.URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs16011
Rezension: Andrea Ploder (2014). Qualitative Forschung als strenge Wissenschaft?
No full textDie Studie "Qualitative Sozialforschung als strenge Wissenschaft?" richtet sich auf die Rezeption Edmund Husserls in der deutschsprachigen Methoden- und Methodologienliteratur in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Wie die Autorin zeigt, ist die Husserl-Lektüre hochgradig von Alfred Schütz geprägt, ohne aber in ihr aufzugehen, da sie auch auf Originaltexte rekurriert. Diese Lektüre wird hier anhand von a priori festgelegten Untersuchungskriterien wie adäquat, modifizierend, affirmativ etc. danach untersucht, wie gründlich sie verlief und welche Potenziale der Originaltexte dabei verschenkt wurden. Das Ergebnis der Untersuchung ist wichtig, da "Verstehen" ein Leitbegriff der qualitativen Sozialforschung ist. (Autorenreferat)The study "Qualitative Forschung als strenge Wissenschaft?" [Qualitative Research as Rigorous Science?] critically examines the reception history of Edmund Husserl in the German methodological literature of qualitative social research. The book argues that Husserl's phenomenology penetrated qualitative research literature predominantly through the work of Alfred Schütz, although Husserl's original work was directly received too. Using a set of defined, a priori criteria, Andrea Ploder carefully plots whether or not Husserl's ideas were absorbed. With this study, Andrea Ploder addresses a relevant problem, because understanding (Verstehen) is paradigmatic in qualitative research. (author's abstract
Ready to be Irritated? Sensitizing the Methods of Qualitative Intercultural Communication Research through Post-colonial Theory
No full textIn academic research on intercultural communication, imperfect translation of culturally shaped articulation is usually conceived of as a problem—be it in scientific settings or in everyday-life. The success of intercultural communication thus becomes the desired goal. Against the background of post-colonial theory, the present contribution rests on the assumption that communicative irritation in the framework of qualitative research can be an expression of the research subjects' resistive potential to negotiate their identities beyond the limits of discursive attributes. The author holds that this potential can be transformed into a fruitful irritation of the scientific discourse itself.
Based on these arguments, qualitative research is required to allow for the resistive potential of research subjects throughout the different stages of the research process. With reference to selected qualitative works, some strategies will be sketched to employ post-colonial ideas to qualitative research.
URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs090142
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
