1,720,959 research outputs found
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA MELAKSANAKAN WEWENANG PENEGAKAN HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA
No full textThe main discussion of this research is concerning the position of KPPU in conducting the task and obligation to overcome and figure out suspect of monopoly practice and unfairly business competition which violate Act Number 5 of 1999. Research results show that in enforcing business competition law and resolving allegation of monopolistic business practice, the KPPU assumes the role as a state auxiliary organ that is independent from government intervention. In practice, the KPPU is a quasi judicial entity because it has the authority to similar to a court’s, inter alia the authority to issue decrees and render judgments. Masalah pokok penelitian ini adalah mengenai kedudukan hukum KPPU dalam melaksanakan tugas dan wewenangnya untuk mengatasi dan menyelesaikan dugaan pelanggaran praktek monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 dalam penegakan hukum persaingan usaha. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam menegakkan hukum persaingan usaha dan menyelesaikan dugaan pelanggaran praktek monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat, KPPU bertindak sebagai lembaga negara komplementer (state auxiliary organ) yang terlepas dari pengaruh pemerintah. Dalam praktik, KPPU merupakan lembaga quasi judicial karena KPPU memiliki kewenangan yang serupa dengan badan peradilan, salah satunya kewenangan untuk mengeluarkan penetapan dan putusan.</p
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA MELAKSANAKAN WEWENANG PENEGAKAN HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA
Full text linkThe main discussion of this research is concerning the position of KPPU in conducting the task and obligation to overcome and figure out suspect of monopoly practice and unfairly business competition which violate Act Number 5 of 1999. Research results show that in enforcing business competition law and resolving allegation of monopolistic business practice, the KPPU assumes the role as a state auxiliary organ that is independent from government intervention. In practice, the KPPU is a quasi judicial entity oecause it has the authority to similar to a court S, inter alia the authority to issue decrees and render judgments.
Masalah pokok penelitian ini adalah mengenai kedudukan hukum KPPU dalam melaksanakan tugas dan wewenangnya untuk mengatasi dan menyelesaikan dugaan pelanggaran praktek monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 dalam penegakan hukum persaingan usaha. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam menegakkan hukum persaingan usaha dan menyelesaikan dugaan pelanggaran praktek monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat, KPPU bertindak sebagai lembaga negara komplementer (state auxiliary organ) yang terlepas dari pengaruh pemerintah. Dalam praktik, KPPU merupakan lembaga quasi judicial karena KPPU memiliki kewenangan yang serupa dengan badan peradilan, salah satunya kewenangan untuk mengeluarkan penetapan dan putusan
The Ambiguity Application of Business Judgment Rule Doctrine As Director Immunity Right in the Company Law (Analysis of Supreme Court Verdict No 121k/Pid.Sus/2020)
No full textDirector is personally liable for the company's losses if proven guilty or negligent in carrying out his duties and may be personally sued by the shareholder as a result of his negligence or mistake in carrying out the management of the company which causes the company to suffer losses. This surely emits fear for Directors and hinders them in making important decisions for the Company. Essentially in carrying out their duties, Directors are always faced with uncertain so that fear of threats to the director’s personal liability is one of the factors that reduces performance. This research uses normative-empiric research by analyzing the written law from such various aspects as theory, history, philosophy, comparison, structure and composition, scope and material, consistency, general explanation, and article by article, formality, and binding power of law, and mainly BJR norm application in the Supreme Court Verdict Number 121K/PID.SUS/2020
The results of this research shows that Judges in the Supreme Court Decision Number 121K/PID.SUS/2020 didn’t consider the criteria for "readiness of information" and "the criteria for taking action to prevent continued losses" which are the essential criterias of the business judgment rule but only considered PT Pertamina has an asset impairment, PT Pertamina Hulu Energi is a subsidiary of a state-owned Enterprise, the Defendant (incasu Karen Agustiawan) has obtained permission from the Board of Commissioners, and the business decision doesn’t contain elements of fraud, conflict of interest, unlawful acts and intentional errors, however these considerations create ambiguity and potential new legal disputes. because the actions of the Defendant (incasu Karen Agustiawan) have fulfilled all elements of the business judgment rule in Article 97 paragraph (5) of the Company Law, although the legal considerations of the Panel of Judges are incomplete, the business judgment rule can still be applied in the Supreme Court Verdict Number 121K/PID.SUS/2020
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Copyright Dispute Resolution in Indonesia
No full textSettlement of Copyright disputes can be done through Alternative dispute resolution, arbitration, in the Commercial Court. Copyright violations often occur so that legal settlement is needed so that the Community as creators can obtain legal certainty. Settlement of copyright disputes in the Commercial Court, this court's competence is absolute competence (absolute competentie) because it is stated that other courts besides the commercial court are not authorized to handle the settlement of copyright disputes and other intellectual property rights, except for Trade Secrets and Plant Varieties. Settlement of copyright disputes through non-litigation is often referred to as copyright settlement carried out outside the court. The existence of dispute resolutions outside the court is a breakthrough because many cases are piling up in the court that have not been resolved
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
