1,721,116 research outputs found
Políticas de datos en revistas de Educación de Web of Science
No full textEl objetivo de este conjunto de datos es examinar de manera sistemática y detallada en qué medida las revistas científicas promueven prácticas vinculadas a la ciencia abierta, particularmente en relación con: la aceptación de material suplementario; la gestión y reutilización de datos; el depósito en repositorios de datos abiertos; la publicación en sitios web institucionales o de autor.
Dentro del marco del proyecto "Los datos de investigación en abierto en Ciencias de la Educación como motor del cambio social (EDUCA-DATA)"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación del Gobierno de España. Agencia Estatal de Investigación. Proyectos de Transición Ecológica y Digital 2021. Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia – Financiado por la Unión Europea-NextGenerationEU4 - Educació de Qualita
Informes de evaluación FAIR de datasets de Educación mediante F-UJI
No full textEste dataset presenta los informes de evaluación del cumplimiento de los principios FAIR en los datasets del ámbito de la Educación depositados en los repositorios Figshare y Zenodo. La evaluación se ha realizado mediante la herramienta F-UJI FAIR Data Assessment Tool, generando informes en formato HTML. Los ficheros incluidos están organizados en distintas categorías de análisis: informes generales, visualizaciones, descargas, citas y fecha.
Dentro del marco del proyecto "Los datos de investigación en abierto en Ciencias de la Educación como motor del cambio social (EDUCA-DATA)"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación del Gobierno de España. Agencia Estatal de Investigación. Proyectos de Transición Ecológica y Digital 2021. Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia – Financiado por la Unión Europea-NextGenerationEU4 - Educació de Qualita
Evaluación de repositorios de datos abiertos del área educativa y multidisciplinares
No full textEste dataset recopila los datos brutos obtenidos de la evaluación de repositorios, de los cuales 27 son del área temática de las Ciencias de la Educación obtenidos de re3data (directorio global de repositorios de investigación) y 4 de carácter multidisciplinar. La selección se realizó aplicando los filtros: tipos de contenido: dataset y tipos de repositorio disciplinar. En el análisis se han considerado seis dimensiones clave relacionadas con la gestión y calidad de los repositorios: Identificadores persistentes; Estándares de metadatos; Acceso y licencias; Preservación; Interoperabilidad y Certificación. La información contenida en este dataset constituye una base para estudios comparativos, diagnósticos de infraestructura de datos en investigación educativa y análisis de buenas prácticas.
Dentro del marco del proyecto "Los datos de investigación en abierto en Ciencias de la Educación como motor del cambio social (EDUCA-DATA)"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación del Gobierno de España. Agencia Estatal de Investigación. Proyectos de Transición Ecológica y Digital 2021. Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia – Financiado por la Unión Europea-NextGenerationEU4 - Educació de Qualita
Directorio del personal docente e investigador del área de Ciencias de la Educación de las universidades públicas españolas
No full textDirectorio del personal docente e investigador del área de Ciencias de la Educación en las universidades públicas españolas, clasificados por género, cargo académico y departamento. Esta clasificación permite analizar la distribución del personal investigador, visibilizando posibles desigualdades en la representación de género y en la ocupación de cargos dentro de esta área.
Dentro del marco del proyecto "Los datos de investigación en abierto en Ciencias de la Educación como motor del cambio social (EDUCA-DATA)"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación del Gobierno de España. Agencia Estatal de Investigación. Proyectos de Transición Ecológica y Digital 2021. Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia – Financiado por la Unión Europea-NextGenerationEU4 - Educació de Qualitat5 - Igualtat de Gèner
Cuestionario sobre gestión de datos de investigación
No full textCuestionario de gestión de datos de investigación formado por 36 preguntas divididas en 3 apartados. A. Datos personales; B. Creación y reutilización de los datos; y C. Preservación y apertura de los datos una vez terminado el proyecto.
Dentro del marco del proyecto "Los datos de investigación en abierto en Ciencias de la Educación como motor del cambio social (EDUCA-DATA)"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación del Gobierno de España. Agencia Estatal de Investigación. Proyectos de Transición Ecológica y Digital 2021. Plan de Recuperación, Transformación y Resiliencia – Financiado por la Unión Europea-NextGenerationEU4 - Educació de Qualita
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Hyperosmolar therapy for acute brain injury: study protocol for an umbrella review of meta-analyses and an evidence mapping
Full text linkINTRODUCTION: Acute brain injury is a challenging public health problem worldwide. Elevated intracranial pressure is a common complication after acute brain injury. Hyperosmolar therapy is one of the main therapeutic strategies for the management of intracranial hypertension. This study protocol outlines an umbrella review of meta-analyses which will investigate the benefits and harms of hyperosmolar therapy routinely used for the management of acute brain injury in the intensive care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. We will include meta-analyses of primary research studies (eg, randomised controlled trials, observational studies or both) that evaluate one or more hyperosmolar solutions (including hypertonic saline and/or mannitol) for the treatment of adult patients with acute brain injury of any severity. Two researchers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion with a third researcher. Primary outcomes will be mortality and neurological outcomes at discharge. Secondary outcomes will include control of intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, length of stay (in hospital an intensive care unit) and any adverse event. Quality of the included meta-analyses will be assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool. An overall summary of methods and results will be performed using tabular and graphical approaches and will be supplemented by narrative description. We will analyse whether published meta-analyses present an outline of available evidence (eg, cited, described and discussed any previous meta-analysis). Where objectives from two or more meta-analyses overlap, we will assess the causes of any noted discrepancies between meta-analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval will be required. Findings from this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. All data will be deposited in a cross-disciplinary public repository. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019148152.FC-L is supported by the Institute of Health Carlos III/CIBERSAM. BH is supported by a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network. The funders were not involved in the design of the protocol or decision to submit the protocol for publication, nor will they be involved in any aspect of the study conduct. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and many not be understood or quoted as being made on behalf of, or reflecting the position of, the funder(s) or any institution.S
Evaluating the online impact of reporting guidelines for randomised trial reports and protocols: a cross-sectional web-based data analysis of CONSORT and SPIRIT initiatives
Full text linkReporting guidelines are tools to help improve the transparency, completeness, and clarity of published articles in health research. Specifically, the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) and SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statements provide evidence-based guidance on what to include in randomised trial articles and protocols to guarantee the efficacy of interventions. These guidelines are subsequently described and discussed in journal articles and used to produce checklists. Determining the online impact (i.e., number and type of links received) of these articles can provide insights into the dissemination of reporting guidelines in broader environments (web-at-large) than simply that of the scientific publications that cite them. To address the technical limitations of link analysis, here the Debug-Validate-Access-Find (DVAF) method is designed and implemented to measure different facets of the guidelines' online impact. A total of 65 articles related to 38 reporting guidelines are taken as a baseline, providing 240,128 URL citations, which are then refined, analysed, and categorised using the DVAF method. A total of 15,582 links to journal articles related to the CONSORT and SPIRIT initiatives were identified. CONSORT 2010 and SPIRIT 2013 were the reporting guidelines that received most links (URL citations) from other online objects (5328 and 2190, respectively). Overall, the online impact obtained is scattered (URL citations are received by different article URL IDs, mainly from link-based DOIs), narrow (limited number of linking domain names, half of articles are linked from fewer than 29 domain names), concentrated (links come from just a few academic publishers, around 60% from publishers), non-reputed (84% of links come from dubious websites and fake domain names) and highly decayed (89% of linking domain names were not accessible at the time of the analysis). In light of these results, it is concluded that the online impact of these guidelines could be improved, and a set of recommendations are proposed to this end.Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.S
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
- …
