1,724,445 research outputs found
Allison, L, 2326607
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/368359Surname: ALLISON
Given Name(s) or Initials: L
Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 2326607
Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 25806178405
Item: [2016.0049.00690] "Allison, L, 2326607
Personalized Dataset Discovery Architecture
No full textGiridhar Manepalli, Allison L. Powell, Suchitra Manepalli, Robert Tupelo- Schneck, and Ben Hadden.
Personalized Dataset Discovery Architecture. Poster Presented at the Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2017
Allison L. Pickett, oboe and english horn
No full textTh. SiegristJean Sibelius, arr. Thomas StacyPaul PattersonJacob Ter-VeldhuisGilles SilvestriniTheodore Lallie
William Fowler’s ‘Instructions for fencing’ and the Scottish context of Prince Henry’s Barriers (1610)
No full textThis article presents an edition of an unedited text by the Scottish writer William Fowler (1560–1612), found in the ‘Hawthornden manuscripts’ (Edinburgh, National Library of Scotland, MSS 2053–2067), accompanied by a discussion of its circumstances and its role within Fowler’s literary production. The text is a translation of a short Italian treatise on fencing, composed by Fowler as part of the preparations for the entertainment known as ‘Barriers’, a tournament on foot staged in 1610 for Henry Frederick, Prince of Wales, son of James VI and I. Prince Henry’s ‘Barriers’ also featured ‘Speeches’ written by Ben Jonson and settings designed by Inigo Jones focusing on the idea of a united Britain. The ‘Instructions for fencing’ provides information on Fowler’s translation practices and on the state of contemporary fencing education and performance, while opening up new perspectives on Anglo-Scottish collaboration at the Stuart court, further problematizing the political dimension of Jacobean entertainments
‘Nusquam Audita’: Mary, Queen of Scots, the Hawthornden Manuscripts, and the Union of the Crowns.
No full textThis article focuses on a collection of short texts commemorating Mary, Queen of Scots (1542–1587) and found in the last five volumes of the ‘Hawthornden manuscripts’. Most of these texts can be attributed to the Scottish Petrarchist writer William Fowler (1560–1612). Textual evidence allows for considerations regarding the circumstances of composition and circulation of the material constituting the Marian corpus in the Hawthornden manuscripts. Using this evidence, this article outlines a literary community engaged in textual exchange. active during a significant period for the definition of British identity, immediately after Union of the Crowns of England and Scotland in 1603. The accession of King James VI of Scotland on the English throne as James I fostered a significant re-evaluation and re-negotiations of Anglo-Scottish positions regarding Mary’s vicissitudes, which is reflected in the literature (especially Scottish) produced in the first decade of James’s British reign
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
