1,721,196 research outputs found
Alexander, Edward Clive, NX32241
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/368112Surname: ALEXANDER
Given Name(s) or Initials: EDWARD CLIVE
Military Service Number or Last Known Location: NX32241
Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 32058178159
Item: [2016.0049.00444] "Alexander, Edward Clive, NX32241
Alexander (Edward). The Holocaust and the War of Ideas
No full textAzria Régine. Alexander (Edward). The Holocaust and the War of Ideas. In: Archives de sciences sociales des religions, n°96, 1996. p. 60
Alexander (Edward). The Holocaust and the War of Ideas
No full textAzria Régine. Alexander (Edward). The Holocaust and the War of Ideas. In: Archives de sciences sociales des religions, n°96, 1996. p. 60
Weissfeiler, J. -- 1965-68 -- Correspondence, Individual -- letter, 1967-12-08
No full textLetter from Alexander, Edward to Sabin, Albert B. dated 1967-12-08.Sabin Collection Fair Use Policy</a
Oceanographic applications of quartz crystal thermometry
Get PDFThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Meteorology, 1968.Vita.Bibliography: leaves 170-172.by Alexander Edward Gilmour.Ph.D
Locating the national in Croatian film culture, 1980-2009
No full textIn this thesis I propose a new methodology for constructing national cinemas, using reception studies, which aims to better convey the plurality of identities present within a national context. Existing national cinemas overwhelmingly rely upon homogenous national identities dictated by scholars who opaquely play judge and jury over inclusion. Each national cinema ostensibly provides a superior representation of a particular nationhood than its predecessors. I argue that filmic nationhood is less absolute and the role of the national cinema scholar should be in communicating the significance of various existing interpretations within a national context. National audiences do not watch films as blank canvasses but rather are conditioned by the context in which they consume them. This necessitates these audiences’ disaggregation according to their various collective identities which enact ingroup favouritism and outgroup discrimination. These identities’ filmic reception is accessed through press materials such as magazines and newspapers which address their particular readership appropriately. Analysis of this reception over an extended period of time constructs a national cinema network and reveals both the complexity and contradictions of filmic nationhood.Croatian film culture from 1980 to 2009 serves as the medium through which I implement my preferred methodology in this thesis. Analysing the varied receptions of six films, I construct a Croatian national cinema which is significantly more nuanced than those which have preceded it. Nationhood is shown to be the most significant collective identity in Croatian film culture, often conditioning the depiction and reception of other national and non-national identities. Nevertheless, this was neither a static nor an exclusive nationhood. What it meant to be Croatian in film culture was concurrently understood in different ways and Croatian imaginings were always supplemented by Yugoslav alternatives
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
