1,721,019 research outputs found

    Computer programs for performing iterative partitioning cluster analysis

    No full text
    Eight programs which perform iterative partitioning cluster analysis are analyzed; they are discussed in terms of versatility of options, accuracy, and cost. These eight programs contain very different heuristic approaches to finding the optimal partition of a data set; the different heuristic approaches are shown to affect both accuracy and cost of clustering solutions. It was not possible to recommend any one program as generally being preferable, however, because of the striking variability in these programs and the lack of knowledge about iterative partitioning methods.Blashfield, Roger K.; Aldenderfer, Mark S.. (1978). Computer programs for performing iterative partitioning cluster analysis. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/99450

    The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity

    No full text
    Far from being perfect, the peer-review process is nevertheless the most effective way to assure the quality of a publication. Because they have used peer review from their very beginnings, American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).(LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).Fil: Lanata, Jose Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; ArgentinaFil: Aldenderfer, Mark. No especifica;Fil: Jochim, Michael. No especifica

    Food Sovereignty

    Full text link
    ‘Food sovereignty’ is an alternative paradigm for food and agriculture which aims to guarantee and protect people’s space, ability, and right to define their own models of production, distribution, and consumption. It is a response to the deep social, economic, and environmental crisis generated by the dominant model of food and agriculture in capitalist, communist, and socialist States. Confronted with hunger, food insecurity, massive depeasantization and the commodification of food through the neoliberal transformation of food systems, the food sovereignty movement seeks to reverse inequitable and ecologically destructive industrial farming, fisheries, forestry and livestock management, and to rebuild the social, economic, cultural, political and spiritual foundations of our agri-food systems. Deeply transformative in its vision and practice, the food sovereignty movement affirms that food is a basic human right, - as opposed to a commodity -, and should be regarded as an integral part of culture, heritage and cosmovisions. This implies that food providers and consumers should be directly and meaningfully involved in framing policies for food and agriculture. The notion of ‘food sovereignty’ is perhaps best understood as a transformative process that seeks to recreate the democratic realm and regenerate a diversity of re-localised and autonomous agri-food systems. Food system transformation is grounded in agroecological practices based on diversity, decentralisation, democracy, and local adaptation within and between territories, with a view to build ecological sustainability and keep life within safe planetary limits. Food sovereignty cannot be achieved without gender and intersectional justice, equity and economies of care, as it ultimately seeks to achieve peaceful co-existence among peoples and care for the earth. Over the last three decades, the concept of food sovereignty has rapidly moved from the margins to more centre stage in international discussions on food, environment, development, and well-being. Since it was first proposed by the transnational agrarian movement La Vía Campesina in 1996, food sovereignty has become a policy framework adopted by some governments and international organizations. In response to advocacy campaigns by peasant organisations and social movements, the United Nations has recently adopted the UN Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other people working in rural areas (UNDROP) which recognizes new human rights to land, water, forests, seeds and natural resources, and outlines states obligations with regards to human-rights based natural resources governance. The UNDROP itself recognizes food sovereignty as a collective right. As the food sovereignty paradigm is gaining traction, the global food sovereignty movement, best described as a movement of movements, is diversifying. Peasant farmers, indigenous peoples, agricultural workers, NGOs and scholar-activists working on food sovereignty are engaging in dialogues with other social actors. Today, the global food sovereignty movement is calling for the convergence of all anti-systemic and anti-capitalist movements, including climate and labour justice movements, feminist movements, black movements, degrowth economics, and anti-war movements. Food sovereignty as a concept, as a right, and as a paradigm for food systems transformation is a valuable starting point for the formulation of joint proposals and actions for systemic change in this emerging confluence of movements. Food sovereignty is also an increasingly popular research topic for a wide range of academic disciplines including anthropology, geography, history, law, philosophy, agronomy and ecology as well as transdisciplinary research on agri-food systems. Historical, decolonial, feminist, cross-cultural, transdisciplinary, and critical perspectives are all needed to further understand the origins, development, and politics of food sovereignty in different contexts. Place-based and nuanced explorations of the multilevel processes that enable and constrain systemic change for food sovereignty can help inform policy and practice in different settings. These are important future directions for research on food sovereignty.<br/

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    The trade, use, and circulation of elephant ivory in sub-Saharan Africa over the longue durée

    Full text link
    Humans have utilized and exchanged ivory from different species of elephant living on the African continent for millennia, with ivory from both forest and savannah species being exploited. Starting around 4600 BP, elephant ivory sourced on the African continent also began to be exported to other parts of the world. The ways of working ivory, the uses to which it has been put, and its symbolic and representational meanings have all varied according to context across space and time. Different agents have played diverse and varying roles in its acquisition, crafting, and distribution. From early on, ivory’s malleability and comparative strength relative to other raw materials made it particularly sought after. Its color and texture, as well as the variation between species and in its structure at different points on a tusk, have also been critical aspects of its material affordances. Archaeological evidence from sub-Saharan Africa, especially material dating from after the BCE/CE transition, combined with ethnographic and historical data, provides important insights into the deep history of ivory, where it has been sourced on the continent, what is known about how it was worked in the distant past, and the changing history of its trade and exchange both within and beyond the continent. Regional and global shifts in its circulation, along with some of the societal and ecological consequences of these have also been studied, with particular reference to eastern Africa. Despite many advances in recent years, there is still a need for further multidisciplinary and multi-sited research informed by posthumanist perspectives and ethics

    Fishing

    No full text
    The anthropology of fisheries is a core focus of maritime anthropology. Scholarship in this field is multifaceted, exploring fishing ways of life, fishing knowledge, marine tenures and economies, the gendered nature of fishing, how people cope with danger and risk, and the specificities of how this particular watery nature is manifested in social, political, and cultural systems. Fishing can be defined as a productive activity that takes place in a multidimensional space, depending more on natural or wild processes than manufactured processes. The idea of fishing being closer to nature is an analytical thread, giving the anthropology of fisheries a particular edge on the multispecies and more than human ethnographic turn in contemporary anthropology. Research in fisheries anthropology has long held the connections between fisher and fish to be of central concern. Significant too, however, is the thesis that the construction of commodity fisheries as a natural domain, of which fishers are atomistic extractors to be managed, is a highly politicized process involving the bioeconomic creation of fish stock and broader political economies. Anthropological research on fisheries engages critically with neoliberalizations, the extension of privatizations, and the proliferation of industrial aquaculture, thus challenging Blue Economy attempts to reconfigure nature–culture relationships and reposition the marine environment as a locus for the enactment and perpetuation of inequality

    Economies of advice

    Full text link
    Because of academic divisions of labour anthropologists have come late to the study of the changing landscape of welfare and advice provision in Euro-America (and beyond). But it is crucial to understanding contemporary economies. Attention to the increasing informalization, hybridization, plurality and complexity of welfare/care/advice provision in the context of 21st-century austerity Europe challenges the widely-held view of how state bureaucracies operate. The corollaries are the difficulties in accessing what help is available (hence the increasing need for advice) and an increase in grassroots mutual aid and activism to supplement and in some cases even supplant state advice provision
    corecore