123,860 research outputs found

    Towns - Albuquerque

    No full text
    Adobe town. Probably Bernalillo. North of Albuquerque. Sandias in distance.; If not Albuquerque, is just north of there. In early 1900s.; Old Albuquerque - Sandias in distance. Probably Bernalillo. Taken from north of Albuquerque. Historic Collection

    Plane landing in Albuquerque, ca. 1913

    No full text
    Labeled as """"First plane to land in Albuquerque, ca. 1913. Pilot either Lincoln Beachey, Roy Francis or Charles F. Walsh."""" Another note lower on back of image says: """"One of the first, if not the first two prop planes in the U.S."""

    A Motor Hotel for Albuquerque, New Mexico

    No full text
    Albuquerque is a natural stopping place because of its location in the Southwest. I have always felt that automobile tourists used Albuquerque for a nights stop because we are a good ways drive from any big city. In any direction if a tourist passes Albuquerque he has a long way to drive to get city conveniences again. With this in mind I have chosen to design a motor hotel that will cater not only to passing tourists, but also to conventioneers

    Ctenocolum aquilus Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa, sp. nov.

    No full text
    <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa sp. nov. <p>(Figs. 8, 22, 35, 53, 66, 79, 91)</p> <p> <b>Type material.</b> Holotype deposited in DZUP, male: “GUARAPUAVA – PARANÁ/ Est.Águas Sta.Clara/ BRASIL 0 2. I. 1987 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” [white label printed in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ HOLOTYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with red margin, first line printed in red, remainder printed in black]. 32 Paratypes deposited in the following collections: 12 in DZUP, 1 male: “Porto Ferreira, SP/ Reserva Estadual – IF/ 28.IX.94 / E.P. Teixeira–col." [white label with margin and E.P. Teixeira–col. printed in black, remainder handwritten in black]; "Hosp. Lonchocarpus / muehlbergianus / Hassl./ (loncocarpus)” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 2 males: “JUNDIAÍ DO SUL – PR/ Fazenda Monte Verde/ BRASIL 29.XII.1986 / Lev. Ent.</p> <p> PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” [white label printed in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 female: “JUNDIAÍ DO SUL – PR/ Fazenda Monte Verde/ BRASIL 29.XII.1986 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” [white label printed in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 female: “JUNDIAÍ DO SUL – PR/ Fazenda Monte Verde/ BRASIL 31.XII.1986 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” [white label printed in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 female: “TELÊMACO BORBA – PR/ Res. Samuel Klabin/ BRASIL 31.III.1987 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” [white label printed in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 male: “PR. Três Barras/ 22.VII.1999 / Maschio, W. col.” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 female: "PR.Três Barras/ 22.VII.1999 / Maschio, W. col." [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro- Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 male: “ BRASIL.PR.Três Barras/ 22.julho.1999/ Maschio, W. col.” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “ Ctenocolum / sp./ Ribeiro-Costa, 2000” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with margin yellow and printed in black]. 1 male: “PR.Três Barras/ 22.VII 1999 / Maschio,W. col.” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “ Ctenocolum / crotonae / (Fahraeus, 1839)” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “Pl. Hosp./ Lonchocarpus / muehlbergianus ” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 male: “GUARAPUAVA – PARANÁ/ Est. Águas Sta. Clara/ BRASIL 29.XI.1986 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” [white label printed in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 female: “GUARAPUAVA – PARANÁ/ Est.Águas Sta.Clara/ BRASIL 27.I.1987 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” [white label printed in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 3 in FSCA, 1 male: “ BRASIL.PR.Três Barras/ 17.julho.1999/ Maschio.W. col.” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. “ 1 female: BRASIL.PR.Três Barras/ 17.julho.1999/ Maschio.W. col.” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 female: "PR.Três Barras/ 22.VII.1999 / Maschio, W. col." [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 3 in MNRJ, 1 male: “PR.Três Barras/ 22.VII.1999 / Mashio, W.col.” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro- Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 female: “PR.Três Barras/ 22.VII.1999 / Mashio, W.col.” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 female: “ BRASIL.PR.Três Barras/17.julho.1999/ Maschio, W. col.” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 3 in MZSP, 1 female: “JUNDIAÍ DO SUL – PR/ Fazenda Monte Verde/ BRASIL 29.XII.1986 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” [white label printed in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 male: “PR. Três Barras/ 22.VII.1999 / Mashio, W.col.” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 female: “PR. Três Barras/ 22.VII.1999 / Mashio, W.col.” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 4 in TAMU, 1 male: “ BRASIL.PR.Três Barras/17.julho.1999/ Maschio.W. col.” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 female: “ BRASIL.PR.Três Barras/ 17.julho.1999/ Maschio.W. col.” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 male: “GUARAPUAVA – PARANÁ/ Est. Águas Sta.Clara/ BRASIL 01.XI.1986 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” [white label printed in black]; “ Ctenocolum / crotonae / (Fhraeus, 1839)” [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 female: GUARAPUAVA – PARANÁ/ Est.Águas Sta.Clara/ BRASIL 0 2. I. 1987 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” [white label printed in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus /</i> Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro <i>-</i> Costa." [white label with yellow margin printed in black]. 4 in USNM, 2 females: "PR.Três Barras/ 22.VII.1999 / Maschio, W. col." [white label with margin printed in black, handwritten in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 2 males: “GUARAPUAVA – PARANÁ/ Est.Águas Sta.Clara/ BRASIL 0 2. I. 1987 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” [white label printed in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 3 in ZMHB, 2 males: “JUNDIAÍ DO SUL – PR/ Fazenda Monte Verde/ BRASIL 29.XII.1986 / Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR/ LÂMPADA” [white label printed in black]; “♂” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black]. 1 female: "PR.Três Barras/ 22.VII.1999 / Maschio, W. col." [white label with printed margin in black, handwritten in black]; “♀” [white label printed in black]; “ PARATYPE / <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> / Det. Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa” [white label with yellow margin, printed in black].</p> <p> <b>Diagnosis.</b> <i>Ctenocolum aquilus</i> Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa <b>sp. nov.</b> differs from all other species by having antennomeres 3–11 darker at apex (Fig. 53) and male genitalia at submedian region with squamous inverted Yshape sclerite (Fig. 79).</p> <p> <b>Description.</b> BL: 2.5–2.9 mm; BW: 1.7–2.0 mm.</p> <p>Integument. Dorsum in general dark brown or dark brown and brown. Antenna pale brown or brown, antennomeres 3–11 darker at apex of each antennomere (Figs. 8, 53). Pygidium rufous and dark brown or pale brown. Ventral region in general black and reddish brown sometimes black, reddish brown and pale brown. Front and middle femur and tibia pale brown to brown; hind femur brown and dark brown.</p> <p>Pubescence. Pronotum brown, white and black; sparse setae exposing integument forming an oval, wide area from anterior to posterior region usually divided by transversal and longitudinal strip of denser setae and on each lateral region one small oval area (Fig. 8). Elytra strongly variegated with brown, white and black setae; interstria 3 with short dense strip of white setae at base and at submedian region (Fig. 8). Pygidium white, dense except on two basal, four lateral and one apical small areas with sparse setae; at median region a larger area with sparse setae (Fig. 35). Ventral region pale brown, brown and white (Fig. 53).</p> <p>Head. Ocular sinus 0.2 mm; ocular index 5.1–6.8; length of eyes in frontal view behind sinus 0.07–0.09 mm (Fig. 22). Antenna serrate from antennomere 4-10 in male and from 5-10 in female. Frons with frontal carina (Fig. 22).</p> <p>Prothorax. Pronotum with median gibbosity slightly elevated, usually not divided by longitudinal sulcus and divided by transversal sulcus; lateral gibbosity slightly to moderately elevated; basal lobe with depression and slightly emarginated (Fig. 8).</p> <p>Mesothorax and metathorax. Elytra, striae with punctures moderately impressed; less conspicuous teeth at base of striae 3 and 4; tooth of stria 4 closer to base of tooth of stria 3 than to anterior margin of elytra; stria 6 conspicuously impressed. Hind femur (Fig. 66) on external ventral margin with toothed carina; without denticles above external ventral margin; pecten with 6–8 teeth. Hind tibia (Fig. 66) strongly emarginated beside mucro; lateral coronal denticles present.</p> <p>Abdomen. Pygidium longer than wide, oval, at median basal region with moderately impressed punctures (Fig. 35).</p> <p>Male genitalia. Median lobe with ventral valve as long as wide, lateral margin concave on subapical region (Fig. 79), basal margin slightly emarginated. Internal sac, lateral apex with short tuft of setae, hinge sclerite curved at base, short, extending over 1/3 of subapical region; subapical region with homogeneously distributed spicules, dense on lateral elongated strip; median region with homogeneously distributed spicules; submedian region with squamous inverted Y-shape sclerite (Fig. 79); basal region without denticles or spines. Tegmen (Fig. 91), lateral lobes separated by emargination about 0.7 times the length of lateral lobes; internal margin near end of emargination straight, forming a “V”; expanded at apex, about 2 times the smallest width on median region; without membranous projection at apex.</p> <p> <b>Etymology.</b> The specific name <i>" aquilus "</i> refers to the antennomeres 3–11 with darker apex.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Neotropical region: Brazil (São Paulo, Paraná).</p> <p> <b>Host plant</b> (Tables I–II). Papilionoideae: <i>Lonchocarpus muehlbergianus</i> Hassl.</p> <p> <b>Note.</b> The species mentioned as <i>C. podagricus</i> by Sari <i>et al</i> (2002) belongs to <i>C. aquilus</i> Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa <b>sp. nov.</b> In their paper, the authors Sari <i>et al.</i> (2002), performed a survey of insects associated with seeds of <i>Lonchocarpus muehlbergianus</i>, recorded from a total of 2,353 examined seeds, 4.9% damaged by <i>C. aquilus</i> Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa <b>sp. nov. (=</b> <i>C. podagricus</i>) and 4.6% by <i>Horismenus missouriensis</i>. According to Sari <i>et al.</i> (2002), the parasitoid <i>H. missouriensis</i> is probably associated with <i>C. aquilus</i> Albuquerque & Ribeiro-Costa <b>sp. nov.</b> (= <i>C. podagricus</i>).</p>Published as part of <i>Albuquerque, Felícia Pereira De, Manfio, Daiara & Ribeiro-Costa, Cibele Stramare, 2014, A contribution to the knowledge of New World Bruchinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae): taxonomic revision of Ctenocolum Kingsolver & Whitehead, with description of five new species, pp. 1-45 in Zootaxa 3838 (1)</i> on pages 21-24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3838.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/286727">http://zenodo.org/record/286727</a&gt

    Author headings for the official publications of the State of Kansas

    No full text
    Includes bibliographical references (page x).This list of author headings covers all official agencies as found in the laws of the territory and the laws of the state of Kansas from May 30, 1854 through July 1955; also agencies created by Executive Order, and administrative divisions, or boards, created within a department of the state. Agencies included are: 1. All departments, bureaus, divisions, commissions, courts, legislative bodies and special committees created by the laws or joint resolutions of the territory or state of Kansas, or by Executive Order* 2. Subdivisions of the respective departments, bureaus, commissions and committees even though not expressly created by acts of the legislature, but which are included in the official reports of the agencies* 3. Legislative bodies and their committees, if created by law, or if their reports were published. 4. Societies supported wholly, or in part, by the state. 5. All state and territorial institutions (including educational, charitable, correctional and penal)

    As If Death Summoned A Novel of the AIDS Epidemic

    No full text
    As If Death Summoned is the powerful story of one man's journey through the AIDS epidemic and finding the courage to bring oneself back from the dead.Intro -- Author's Note -- Prologue -- Chapter One -- Chapter Two -- Chapter Three -- Chapter Four -- Chapter Five -- Chapter Six -- Chapter Seven -- Chapter Eight -- Chapter Nine -- Chapter Ten -- Chapter Eleven -- Chapter Twelve -- Chapter Thirteen -- Chapter Fourteen -- Chapter Fifteen -- Chapter Sixteen -- Chapter Seventeen -- Chapter Eighteen -- Chapter Nineteen -- Chapter Twenty -- Chapter Twenty-One -- Chapter Twenty-Two -- Chapter Twenty-Three -- Chapter Twenty-Four -- Chapter Twenty-Five -- Chapter Twenty-Six -- Chapter Twenty-Seven -- Chapter Twenty-Eight -- Chapter Twenty-Nine -- Chapter Thirty -- Chapter Thirty-One -- Chapter Thirty-Two -- Chapter Thirty-Three -- Chapter Thirty-Four -- Chapter Thirty-Five -- Chapter Thirty-Six -- Chapter Thirty-Seven -- Chapter Thirty-Eight -- Chapter Thirty-Nine -- Chapter Forty -- Chapter Forty-One -- Chapter Forty-Two -- Chapter Forty-Three -- Chapter Forty-Four -- Chapter Forty-Five -- Chapter Forty-Six -- Chapter Forty-Seven -- Chapter Forty-Eight -- Chapter Forty-Nine -- Chapter Fifty -- Postscript -- Acknowledgments -- About the Author -- Copyright -- Discussion Guide -- About Amble PressAs If Death Summoned is the powerful story of one man's journey through the AIDS epidemic and finding the courage to bring oneself back from the dead.Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, YYYY. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries

    “Not ‘Do you remember’, but ‘What if’?”

    No full text
    Short story based on the author Katherine Mansfiel

    Albuquerque Arroyos Sedimentation Study: Numerical Model Investigation

    No full text
    Source: https://erdc-library.erdc.dren.mil/jspui/The sedimentation study for the Albuquerque Arroyos Flood Control Project was conducted to determine if deposition in the concrete-lined North Diversion and Embudo Arroyo Channels would cause overtopping during the 100-year-frequency flood. The project was originally designed and constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the Standard Project Flood, but the effects of sediment deposition in the channel were ignored. A recent flood deposited significant quantities of sediment in the Embudo Arroyo Channel, raising concerns about the channel 's ability to carry larger flood discharges. The sedimentation study included a geomorphic assessment conducted under contract by Resource Consultants and Engineers of Fort Collins, CO. The geomorphic study assessed the stability of arroyos that drain into the North Diversion Channel and identified primary sediment sources in the watershed. The sedimentation study also included determination of sediment yield for each watershed that drains into the North Diversion Channel. Since there is no generally accepted method for calculating sediment yield, several different methods were used to calculate yield and compared with limited measured data. Trap efficiencies for flood detention reservoirs and sediment traps were estimated. The detention basins had trap efficiencies between 88 and 96 percent. In the larger basins almost all of the sand and greater sediment sizes were trapped. The sediment traps effectively remove between 62 and 74 percent of the sand and greater size sediment. The TABS-1 numerical sedimentation model was used to predict deposition in the concrete-lined channels. The effect of sediment deposits on boundary roughness was determined using analytical techniques. Calculated roughnesses were incorporated into the numerical model and an iterative procedure was used to determine the effect of deposited sediment on conveyance and roughness. The numerical model was circumstantiated using data from a historical flood where significant deposition occurred in the Embudo Arroyo Channel. Sediment inflow to the numerical model was determined using results of the sediment yield and trap efficiency studies. It was determined that the primary source of sediment was the unlined channels upstream from the concrete-lined channels. Considerable uncertainty exists relative to the quantity of sediment delivered by the 100-year-frequency flood. Sensitivity studies were conducted to assess the impact of different sediment loadings. The study concluded that, while channel roughness was increased in certain reaches of the concrete-lined channel, the increase in roughness was insufficient to result in overtopping of the existing channel during the 100-year-frequency flood. The study also concluded that sediment deposition problems in the North Diversion Channel and Embudo Arroyo are decreasing due to continuing channel improvement projects

    The Shifting Values of Port Cities: Towards “what if histories” and “design fiction”?

    No full text
    What if we had the chance to reboot and redesign our society? Who would have considered it possible that the current pandemic crisis offers exactly that opportunity? Within a matter of weeks, we have experienced a change in lifestyle that seemed impossible as a response to climate change a few months ago. The COVID-19 pandemic is hitting people and businesses hard. This is also true of ports and their surrounding cities. Attempts to protect people from a life-threatening disease have changed the functioning of such port cities around the world. In some, ships continue to deliver much-needed goods. But in others, they have become floating storage or laid up, upsetting the entire maritime system. Meanwhile, streets and public spaces are emptier than usual, with satellite images revealing significant drops in air pollution. While some people are working harder than ever—think of the medical professions—others have lost their jobs and their livelihood or even died.History, Form & Aesthetic

    The Albuquerque Police Strike

    No full text
    When representatives of the city of Albuquerque and the Albuquerque city police were unable to negotiate a new contract when the previous contract expired on June 30, 1975, the police officers engaged in a work slowdown by issuing less traffic citations. On Saturday, July 12, the officers on the third shift were told to end their slowdown. Instead, the officers on the third shift began a wildcat strike that afternoon. By Saturday night, 240 officers had joined the strike; that number soon grew to about 340 officers out of a total police department of 504. On the following Thursday, those 340 officers submitted their resignations so as not to be held in contempt of court after a district court judge issued an injunction ordering them back to work. After two mediators had attempted to reach an agreement satisfactory to both sides, a three-man factfinding panel was established to further aid negotiations. One issue that the factfinding panel successfully dealt with was what to do with seven sergeants that had joined the officers on strike. (A.P.O.A.), offered the City on Monday, July 21, a contract that called for less benefits than a City contract offer rejected earlier by the union membership. The A.P.O.A. felt that an agreement was needed after ten days of a strike. Since the 1975 contract agreement, representatives of the City and the union now deal with each other honestly and openly when trying to solve problems that arise instead of both sides assuming adversary roles. After a compromise was reached whereby the seven sergeants would be demoted for 120 days and then be reevaluated by the Chief of Police to determine if they would be promoted to sergeants again, the union representing the police, the Albuquerque Police Officers Associatio
    corecore