1,366,565 research outputs found

    Corona sepulcral : elogios en la muerte de Don Martin Suarez de Alarcon ...

    No full text
    Prelim. fechados en Madrid, 1653Sign.: [ ]\p2\s, a-e\p4\s, A-Z\p4\s, 2A-2Q\p4\sPort. grab. calc.: "Petrus de Villafranca inuent. et sculp. Matriti, 1652"La h. de grab. calc.: "D. Alfons de Alarcon inuen. Matriti, 1652 p. de Villafranca sculpsit", representa a Martín Suárez de Alarcó

    vivi-alarcon/EFAallocationinfarmland: EFA_allocation_in_farmland_v1.0

    No full text
    This repository contains all codes for implementing the analysis of the project EFA allocation in farmland Alarcon-Segura et a

    Orestes Estevam Alarcon

    No full text

    Comentarios de los hechos del señor Alarcon, marques de la Valle Siciliana y de Renda, y de las guerras en que se hallò por espacio de cinquenta y ocho años

    No full text
    Año de port. corregido con banderilla, a traves de la que puede verse 1655Sign.: [calderón]\p6\s, 2[calderón]\p4\s, A-Z\p2\s, 2A-2Z\p2\s, 3A-3Z\p2\s, 4A-4Z\p2\s, 5A-5Z, 6A-6G\p2\sTexto a dos colLa h. de grab. calc.: "Ex Titiani Archetypo Pereter sculp.", es un retrato del biografiad

    Alarcon, Agnes Dorothy, Kowloon

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/368028Surname: ALARCON Given Name(s) or Initials: AGNES DOROTHY Military Service Number or Last Known Location: KOWLOON Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 13066178075 Item: [2016.0049.00360] "Alarcon, Agnes Dorothy, Kowloon

    Jhonatan-Alarcon/Supplementary-files_Gonkoken-nanoi: Supplementary files_Alarcón-Muñoz et al. 2023

    No full text
    Auxiliary files associated with Alarcón-Muñoz et al. (2023) describing a new hadrosaur species from the Magallanes region, Chile

    Geology of the Alarcon Rise, Southern Gulf of California

    No full text
    Meter‐scale AUV bathymetric mapping and ROV sampling of the entire 47 km‐long Alarcon Rise between the Pescadero and Tamayo transforms show that the shallowest inflated portion of the segment hosts all four active hydrothermal vent fields and the youngest, hottest, and highest effusion rate lava flows. This shallowest inflated part is located ∼1/3 of the way between the Tamayo and Pescadero transforms and is paved by a 16 km2 channelized flow that erupted from 9 km of en echelon fissures and is larger than historic flows on the East Pacific Rise or on the Gorda and Juan de Fuca Ridges. Starting ∼5 km south of the Pescadero transform, 6.5 km of the Alarcon Rise is characterized by faulted ridges and domes of fractionated lavas ranging from basaltic andesite to rhyolite with up to 77.3 wt % SiO2. These are the first known rhyolites from the submarine global mid‐ocean ridge system. Silicic lavas range from >11.7 ka, to as young as 1.1 ka. A basalt‐to‐basaltic andesite sequence and an andesite‐to‐dacite‐to‐rhyolite sequence are consistent with crystal fractionation but some intermediate basaltic andesite and andesite formed by mixing basalt with dacite or rhyolite. Magmatism occurred along the bounding Tamayo and Pescadero transforms as extensive channelized flows. The flows erupted from ring faults surrounding uplifted sediment hills inferred to overlie sills. The transforms are transtensional to accommodate magma migration from the adjacent Alarcon Rise

    Minimally invasive component separation technique for large ventral hernia: which is the best choice? A systematic literature review

    No full text
    Background Aim of the present systematic review is to compare the postoperative outcomes after minimally invasive anterior and posterior component separation technique (CST), in terms of postoperative morbidity and recurrence rates. Methods Nine-hundred and fifty-nine articles were identified through Pubmed database. Of these, 444 were eliminated because were duplicates between the searches. Of the remaining 515 articles, 414 were excluded after screening title and abstract. One hundred and one articles were fully analysed, and 73 articles were further excluded, finally including 28 articles. Based on the surgical technique, three groups were created: Group A, endoscopic anterior CST and closure of the abdominal midline by laparotomy; Group B, endoscopic anterior CST and closure of the abdominal midline laparoscopically or robotically; Group C, laparoscopic or robotic posterior CST with transversus abdominal muscle release (TAR). Results In group A, B and C, 196, 120 and 236 patients were included, respectively. Surgical and medical complication rates for the three groups were 31.2% and 13.7% in group A, 15.8% and 4.1% in group B, and 17.8% and 25.4% in group C, while recurrence rate was 10.7%, 6.6% and 0.4%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in terms of surgical postoperative complication rate between group A versus B (p = 0.0022) and between group A versus C (p = 0.0015) and of recurrence rate between group A versus C (p = < 0.0001) and B versus C (p = 0.0009). Conclusions Anterior CST with midline closure by laparotomy showed the worst results in terms of postoperative surgical complications and recurrence in comparison to the pure minimally anterior and posterior CST. Posterior CST-TAR showed lowest hospital stay and recurrence rate, although the follow-up is short. However, due to the poor quality of most of the studies, further prospective studies and randomized control trials, with wider sample size and longer follow-up are required to demonstrate which is the best surgical option

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore