1,720,985 research outputs found
Possible association between breast thyroid carcinoma: Analysis of risk factors
No full textBACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common tumor in women, 523.000 cases were estimated in Europe in 2018 and it remains the third cause of cancer related deaths after lung and colorectal cancer. The incidence of thyroid cancer (TC) in females is higher than in males. METHODS: We have retrospectively collected all female patients undergone to surgery for breast or thyroid cancer in 2010The aim of the study was to value the incidence of BC in patients with a personal history of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) and conversely, the incidence of DTC in patients with previous BC within 5 years from the diagnosis of the first tumor in 2010. RESULTS: Among 76 BC patients, 11 were death and 22 didn’t answer the phone call or refused to re-submit to thyroid ultrasound so they were excluded from the study and only 43 BC were further considered. Thyroid ultrasound was performed in 2010 and in 2016 and it described nodules in 13 (30%) patients in 2010 and in 21 (49%) patients in 2016. In 2010 no FNA was needed while in 2016 6 (14%) patients underwent to FNA with a benign response (Thyr 2). Among 61 DTC patients, 11 didn’t answer the phone or the questions so 50 patients were included in the study. Breast cancer family history was reported in 14 (28%) patients and thyroid cancer family history in 8 (16%) patients. No relapse was reported during follow up.All patients underwent to mammography in 2015 or in 2016 within screening programs and no breast cancer were diagnosed. CONCLUSION: The female predominance of diseases of the thyroid and breast makes difficult the separation of an expected association with a casual linkageThe relationship between the co-occurrence of breast and thyroid cancer remains controversial and inconclusive
One-Step Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Dermal Matrix–Covered Implant Compared to Submuscular Implantation: Functional and Cost Evaluation
No full textThe aim of this study was to compare the functional and economical outcomes of the prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) versus the subectoral one. PPBR entailed significantly lower postoperative pain and faster upper limb functional recovery than subpectoral procedure. Moreover, PPBR largely reduced the need for symmetrization. Therefore, PPBR was also economically advantageous over traditional implant reconstruction. Background: The breast reconstructive subpectoral technique commonly leads to functional consequences. Recently, a new conservative prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) technique was proposed and its surgical safety and aesthetic effectiveness proved. The aim of this prospective nonrandomized study was to compare the functional and economical outcomes of the PPBR procedure versus the subpectoral one. Patients and Methods: From February 2015 to September 2016, 86 patients underwent mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction. Thirty-nine patients were assigned to group 1 and received prepectoral acellular dermal matrix–wrapped implant reconstruction. The remaining 45 patients were assigned to group 2 and received a subpectoral implant or tissue expander. We recorded the operating time, length of hospital stay, analgesic consumption, postoperative pain, upper limb function, esthetic satisfaction, and quality of life. Additional surgical procedures for reconstruction completion or contralateral operation for symmetrization were also recorded. Results: Compared to group 2 patients, group 1 patients showed less postoperative pain and faster upper limb functional recovery. Patients in group 1 also recorded a lower analgesic consumption and an earlier return to usual work. Moreover, the muscle-sparing technique improved aesthetic outcomes and largely reduced the need for symmetrization. Conclusion: Immediate breast reconstruction by using prepectoral muscle-sparing acellular dermal matrix–wrapped implant resulted in lower pain intensity and significant upper limb functional advantages compared to submuscular implant placement. Furthermore, when considering a series of ascertained benefits, PPBR is also economically advantageous, although future studies should better define its cost-effectiveness
Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap in Immediate Reconstruction after Salvage Mastectomy Post-Lumpectomy and Radiation Therapy
No full textBackground: Breast reconstruction after salvage mastectomy (SM) for recurrent cancer represents a challenge in preradiated patients due to the increased complication rate. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (LDMF) represents a good reconstructive option due to its versatility, safety, and adaptability. Methods: Fifty-nine patients treated in the Breast Surgery Unit at the University Hospital of Parma (Italy) between January 2010 and December 2017 for ipsilateral breast recurrent cancer, previously treated by partial mastectomy plus whole-breast radiation therapy, were analyzed. They underwent SM and immediate reconstruction with implant-assisted pedicled LDMF. We registered local treatment, oncologic characteristics, complications, capsular contracture rate, DASH test, and BREAST-Q scores. Results: Mean implant volume was 403 g (range 135-650 g). Contralateral operations were 16/59 (27.1%). We obtained complete postoperative pain control in most cases with paracetamol. Medium hospital stay was 2.8 days. We registered 3.4% major complications and 6.8% minor ones. Mean follow-up was 26.65 months (range 3-91.9 months). DASH questionnaire evidenced no disability for 71.19% of patients and minimum disability for 28.81% of them. BREAST-Q Aesthetic Questionnaire obtained 92.72%. No patient developed Baker III or IV capsular contracture. Conclusions: LDMF with implant is a reliable and safe procedure for 1-step breast reconstruction after SM for recurrent cancer in radiated breast. It entails a low rate of major complications, achieving stable and pleasant results without significant upper limb functional impairment, also for elderly women and larger breasts. Thus, a definite role is yet predictable for this flap in the setting of SM in all cases not suitable for free-flap reconstruction
One-step prepectoral breast reconstruction with porcine dermal matrix-covered implant: A protective technique improving the outcome in post-mastectomy radiation therapy setting
No full textBackground: Post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) applied on implant-assisted immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) involves a marked increase in complication rate. The recent opportunity of performing an ADM-assisted prepectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) raised the hypotesis of a protective interaction between ADM and periprosthetic tissues under PMRT. Methods: We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of a cohort of consecutively treated patients undergone one-step PPBR between January 2015 and September 2018. The aim is to examine complication rate and aesthetic satisfaction of patients, in order to evaluate if this reconstructive technique could be recommendable in PMRT setting. Group 1 comprised 158 patients not submitted to PMRT and Group 2 twenty-eight patients undergone PMRT. Results: All post-operative complications were not statistically different between the two groups, except for capsular contracture (P=0.011). We obtained very high percentages in all BREAST-Q categories in Group 2 patients: satisfaction with breasts 86.8±13.9, satisfaction with implants 6.5±3.0, high satisfaction for no adverse effects of radiation 15.7±6.8. According to multivariate analysis no risk factor was significantly associated with complications. Conclusions: We may conclude that one-step PPBR with porcine ADM followed by PMRT is well tolerated, with no significant risk of adverse outcomes, at least in the short-term follow-up. These promising outcomes warrant further studies to examine the existence of a protective effect due to ADM integration with subcutaneous tissue
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
