1,720,954 research outputs found
Tantangan Pemberian Kewenangan Bagi Penyidik Pejabat Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) Kehutanan Sumatera Barat Pada Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang
Law Number 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering (AML Law) serves as the cornerstone of anti-money laundering enforcement in Indonesia today, but it still falls short in accommodating the needs of money laundering law enforcement. Explanation of Article 74 of the AML Law limits the role of criminal investigators solely to the National Narcotics Agency (BNN), the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the Police, the Prosecutor's Office, Customs, and Tax Authorities. This explanation of Article 74 contradicts the AML Law. This situation leaves the Environmental and Forestry Crime Investigators (PPNS Kehutanan) without the authority to investigate money laundering cases in the forestry sector and hampers efforts to combat money laundering. Ultimately, Constitutional Court Decision No. 15/PUU-XIX/2021 breathed new life into money laundering investigations by broadening the definition of investigators and granting authority to PPNS Kehutanan to handle money laundering cases. Based on this research, the author concludes that following Constitutional Court Decision No. 15/PUU-XIX/2021, PPNS in the forestry sector has the authority to investigate cases of money laundering. The authority held by PPNS Kehutanan in conducting money laundering investigations includes the power to delay transactions, the power to request information about wealth from the reporter, the power to seize assets, and the power to block assets. In West Sumatra, the investigation of money laundering in the forestry sector is assigned to PPNS of the Provincial Forestry Service and PPNS of the Directorate General of Law Enforcement and Forest Protection (Gakkum LHK). These two institutions coordinate to handle all forestry crimes, including money laundering. Furthermore, coordination is also carried out with the National Police (POLRI) and the Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) in resolving money laundering cases
Kewenangan penyidik pejabat pegawai negeri sipil (PPNS) kehutanan dalam melakukan penyidikan terkait tindak pidana pencucian uang pasca putusan MK nomor 15/PUUXIX/2021 (studi di Dinas Kehutanan Sumatera Barat)
viii.; 65 hal.; ill.; 19 c
Kewenangan Penyidik Pejabat Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) Kehutanan Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Terkait Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 15/PUU-XIX/2021 (Studi di Dinas Kehutanan Sumatera Barat)
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana
Pencucian Uang (UU PPTPPU) menjadi ujung tombak penegakan rezim anti pencucian uang di
Indonesia saat ini namun masih belum mengakomodir kebutuhan dalam penegakan hukum tindak
pidana pencucian uang. Penjelasan Pasal 74 UUPPTPPU membatasi peran penyidik tindak pidana
asal hanya sebatas BNN, KPK, Kepolisian, Kejaksaan, Bea Cukai, dan Pajak. Penjelasan Pasal 74
tersebut bertentangan dengan Pasal 74 UU PPTPPU. Hal ini membuat Penyidik PPNS Kehutanan
tidak memiliki wewenang untuk melakukan penyidikan TPPU di bidang kehutanan dan
menghambat pemberantasan TPPU. Hingga pada akhirnya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
No.15/PUU-XIX/2021 membawa angin segar pada penyidikan dalam kasus tindak pidana
pencucian uang karena melebarkan definisi penyidik dan memberikan kewenangan pada penyidik
PPNS Kehutanan dalam menangani tindak pidana pencucian uang. Adapun permasalahan yang
diangkat dalam skripsi ini yaitu: 1) Bagaimanakah Kewenangan Penyidik Pejabat Pegawai Negeri
Sipil Dinas Kehutanan dalam melakukan penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Pasca pasca
putusan MK No.15/PUU-XIX/2021? 2) Bagaimanakah Proses Penyidikan Tindak Pidana
Pencucian Uang Pasca putusan MK No.15/PUU-XIX/2021? Metode penelitian yang digunakan
oleh penulis adalah metode yuridis empiris yaitu cara prosedur yang dipergunakan untuk
memecahkan masalah penelitian dengan meneliti data primer di lapangan serta ditambah dengan
data sekunder. Serta sifat dari penelitian ialah bersifat deskriptif analitis. Dari hasil penelitian ini
penulis mendapatkan kesimpulan 1) Pasca Putusan MK No. 15/PUU-XIX/2021, PPNS di Bidang
Kehutanan memiliki kewenangan untuk menyidik dalam kasus TPPU. Kewenangan yang dimiliki
oleh PPNS Kehutanan dalam melakukan penyidikan TPPU yaitu kewenangan untuk melakukan
penundaan transaksi, Kewenangan untuk meminta keterangan atas harta kekayaan kepada pelapor,
kewenangan untuk melakukan perampasan aset, dan kewenangan untuk melakukan pemblokiran.
2)Untuk wilayah Sumatera Barat, penyidikan TPPU di Bidang Kehutanan diberikan kepada PPNS
Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi serta PPNS Ditjen Gakkum LHK. Kedua lembaga tersebut melakukan
koordinasi untuk menangani seluruh tindak pidana kehutanan, termasuk TPPU. Selain itu,
koordinasi juga dilakukan kepada POLRI maupun PPATK dalam menyelesaikan kasus TPPU.
Kata Kunci: Kewenangan, Penyidik PPNS Kehutanan, Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang,
Putusan MK
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
