1,720,954 research outputs found
Salah satu lembaga hukum baru yang diciptakan dalam KUHAP adalah lembaga Praperadilan. Wewenang dan fungsi Praperadilan adalah tugas tambahan Pengadilan Negeri untuk memeriksa dan memutus : sah atau tidaknya penangkapan dan atau penahanan; sah atau tidaknya penghentian penyidikan atau penghentian penuntutan dan permintaan ganti kerugian atau rehabilitasi bagi seorang yang perkara pidananya dihentikan pada tingkat penyidikan atau penuntutan. Hakim Praperadilan Sarpin Rizaldi dalam Putusan No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel menetapkan penetapan tersangka Komjen (Pol) Budi Gunawan tidak sah. Bisa disimpulkan bahwa putusan hakim Praperadilan Budi Gunawan adalah tidak tepat karena tidak sesuai dengan Pasal 77 KUHAP. Permasalahan yang akan dibahas dalam skripsi ini adalah : apakah putusan hakim Sarpin Rizaldi atas Praperadilan Budi Gunawan sudah sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku. Jenis penelitian ini adalah normatif karena mengkaji putusan Praperadilan Budi Gunawan dengan nomor perkara 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel yang meliputi pendekatan kasus, perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Prosedur pengumpulan serta pengolahan bahan hukum dalam penulisan skripsi ini adalah dengan mengumpulkan bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder, yang kemudian dilakukan analisa dan inventarisasi baik itu terhadap bahan hukum primer maupun bahan hukum sekunder tersebut. Putusan hakim Sarpin dalam Praperadilan yang menetapkan pembatalan status tersangka Budi Gunawan pada perkara nomor 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. adalah kurang tepat, mengingat proses penetapan Budi Gunawan menjadi tersangka telah sesuai dengan prosedur yang berlaku pada saat itu, Budi Gunawan termasuk dalam kategori Penyelenggara Negara, dan Budi Gunawan sama sekali belum dikenakan upaya paksa, sehingga Budi Gunawan tidak memiliki legal standing untuk mengajukan gugatan Praperadilan.
Kata Kunci : Putusan, Praperadilan, Budi Gunawan.
Abstract
One of the new legal institution which has created in KUHAP / the Code of Criminal Procedure was Pretrial institutions. The authority and functions of this institution is an additional task to investigate and decide: whether or not lawful arrest and/or detention ; the validity of the termination of investigation or prosesution; compensation request or rehabilitation for people whom their criminal case was stopped either at the level of investigation or prosecution. Pretrial Judge Sarpin Rizaldi in the verdict No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel established that suspect determination of Komjen (Pol) Budi Gunawan was invalid. It can be concluded that the Pretrial judge's decision of Budi Gunawan was not appropriate because it didn’t conform with Pasal 77 KUHAP. Issues to be discussed in this study is, Does the Pretrial judge's ruling Sarpin Rizaldi towards Budi Gunawan are in accordance with the applicable regulations. This type of study is normative due to reviewing the Pretrial decision of Budi Gunawan with case number 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. which using includes cases, legislation and conceptual approaches. The prosedure of collecting and processing any legal material in this essay was by collecting primary and secondary law material, which then conducted an analysis and inventory of the law material either primary or secomdary. Sarpin pretrial judge's ruling that establishes the cancellation status of Budi Gunawan as suspects in case number 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. is less appropriate, considering the setting process of Budi Gunawan as suspects is in accordance with the applicable procedures at that time, Budi Gunawan included in the category of State Officials, and Budi Gunawan didn’t received any forceful eforts, so Budi Gunawan didn’t have legal standing to file a Pretrial lawsuit
Keywords : Verdict, Pretrial, Budi Gunawa
TINJAUAN YURIDIS ATAS PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN DALAM PERKARA NO. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN UNTUK TIDAK SAHNYA STATUS TERSANGKA BUDI GUNAWAN ATAS KASUS KORUPSI)
No full textSalah satu lembaga hukum baru yang diciptakan dalam KUHAP adalah lembaga Praperadilan. Wewenang dan fungsi Praperadilan adalah tugas tambahan Pengadilan Negeri untuk memeriksa dan memutus : sah atau tidaknya penangkapan dan atau penahanan; sah atau tidaknya penghentian penyidikan atau penghentian penuntutan dan permintaan ganti kerugian atau rehabilitasi bagi seorang yang perkara pidananya dihentikan pada tingkat penyidikan atau penuntutan. Hakim Praperadilan Sarpin Rizaldi dalam Putusan No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel menetapkan penetapan tersangka Komjen (Pol) Budi Gunawan tidak sah. Bisa disimpulkan bahwa putusan hakim Praperadilan Budi Gunawan adalah tidak tepat karena tidak sesuai dengan Pasal 77 KUHAP. Permasalahan yang akan dibahas dalam skripsi ini adalah : apakah putusan hakim Sarpin Rizaldi atas Praperadilan Budi Gunawan sudah sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku. Jenis penelitian ini adalah normatif karena mengkaji putusan Praperadilan Budi Gunawan dengan nomor perkara 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel yang meliputi pendekatan kasus, perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Prosedur pengumpulan serta pengolahan bahan hukum dalam penulisan skripsi ini adalah dengan mengumpulkan bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder, yang kemudian dilakukan analisa dan inventarisasi baik itu terhadap bahan hukum primer maupun bahan hukum sekunder tersebut. Putusan hakim Sarpin dalam Praperadilan yang menetapkan pembatalan status tersangka Budi Gunawan pada perkara nomor 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. adalah kurang tepat, mengingat proses penetapan Budi Gunawan menjadi tersangka telah sesuai dengan prosedur yang berlaku pada saat itu, Budi Gunawan termasuk dalam kategori Penyelenggara Negara, dan Budi Gunawan sama sekali belum dikenakan upaya paksa, sehingga Budi Gunawan tidak memiliki legal standing untuk mengajukan gugatan Praperadilan.
Kata Kunci : Putusan, Praperadilan, Budi Gunawan.
Abstract
One of the new legal institution which has created in KUHAP / the Code of Criminal Procedure was Pretrial institutions. The authority and functions of this institution is an additional task to investigate and decide: whether or not lawful arrest and/or detention ; the validity of the termination of investigation or prosesution; compensation request or rehabilitation for people whom their criminal case was stopped either at the level of investigation or prosecution. Pretrial Judge Sarpin Rizaldi in the verdict No. 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel established that suspect determination of Komjen (Pol) Budi Gunawan was invalid. It can be concluded that the Pretrial judge's decision of Budi Gunawan was not appropriate because it didn’t conform with Pasal 77 KUHAP. Issues to be discussed in this study is, Does the Pretrial judge's ruling Sarpin Rizaldi towards Budi Gunawan are in accordance with the applicable regulations. This type of study is normative due to reviewing the Pretrial decision of Budi Gunawan with case number 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. which using includes cases, legislation and conceptual approaches. The prosedure of collecting and processing any legal material in this essay was by collecting primary and secondary law material, which then conducted an analysis and inventory of the law material either primary or secomdary. Sarpin pretrial judge's ruling that establishes the cancellation status of Budi Gunawan as suspects in case number 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jkt.Sel. is less appropriate, considering the setting process of Budi Gunawan as suspects is in accordance with the applicable procedures at that time, Budi Gunawan included in the category of State Officials, and Budi Gunawan didn’t received any forceful eforts, so Budi Gunawan didn’t have legal standing to file a Pretrial lawsuit
Keywords : Verdict, Pretrial, Budi Gunawa
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
No full text“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
