1,720,954 research outputs found
İSTANBUL METROPOLİTEN ALANI’NDA 1980 SONRASI KENTSEL GELİŞME DİNAMİKLERİ VE İDARİ COĞRAFYADA SINIR DEĞİŞİKLİKLERİ
1980’liyıllardan bu yana İstanbul Metropoliten Alanı’ndaki mekânsal değişim; 1980,1995, 2006 ve 2009 yıllarında onaylanan üst ölçekli mekânsal planlamaçalışmaları ile kontrol altına alınmaya çalışılmaktadır. Mekânsal planlamaçalışmaları bir yandan devam ederken, diğer yandan metropoliten alandaki idariyönetim yapısında da önemli değişimler olmaktadır. 1984-2004 yılları arasında3030 sayılı Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kanunu, 2004-2008 yılları arasında 5216sayılı Büyükşehir Belediyesi Kanunu, 2008-2012 yılları arasında kabul edilen5747 sayılı Büyükşehir Belediyesi Sınırları İçerisinde İlçe Kurulması Ve BazıKanunlarda Değişiklik Yapılması Hakkında Kanun ve 2012 yılı sonrasında 6360sayılı On Dört İlde Büyükşehir Belediyesi Ve Yirmi Yedi İlçe Kurulması İle BazıKanun Ve Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamelerde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun, tümülkede metropoliten kentlere ilişkin önemli değişimler yaratmıştır. İstanbulMetropoliten Alanı’nda kentsel gelişmenin bir göstergesi olarak idari sınırlarsürekli değişse de uluslararası sermayenin yönlendirmeleri ile kentselbölgedeki dinamikler daha çok etkili olmaktadır. Bu haliyle idari sınırdeğişiklikleri, kentsel gelişmenin yönlen-diricisi olmaktan çok, mekânsaldeğişimin yasallaşmasına olanak sağlayan bir fırsat olarakdeğerlendirilmektedir. Sonuç olarak, İstanbul’u içinde bulunduğu bölge içindebir finans merkezi yapma yolundaki değişim hedefleri ile kentin bütüncülplanlama çalışmaları arasında doğrusal bir ilişki bulunmadığı, yasal mevzuat veplanlama sürecindeki parçalanmışlığı destekleyecek şekilde idari sınır deği-şikliklerininyapıldığı, ülkedeki birincil metropol kentin salt kendi il sınırlarında değil,içinde bulunduğu kentsel sistemin bir parçası olarak planlanması gerektiği,idari sınırlara bağlı bir planlama anlayışından ziyade, stratejik planlamabölgelerine dayalı idari sınırların geliştirilmesi gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır
Narratives #1: Eastern Mediterranean and Atlantic European Cities
We have selected seven contributions for this issue of Spool, four from the Eastern Mediterranean basin (Istanbul, Beirut, Acre and Jaffa) and three from Atlantic Europe (Bodø, Matosinhos and Gafanha da Nazaré).Roula El Khoury and Paola Ardizzola address the post-civil war reconstruction of Beirut in Lebanon and reveal how neoliberal models of development resulted in a generic city. Adem Erdem Erbas uses the Istanbul port heritage area in Turkey to showcase how GIS helps to consider underground cultural inventory from a historic landscape perspective within the framework of the conservation plans.Ana Jayone Yarza Pérez explores the potential of adaptive reuse evaluation procedure in the Old City of Acre, Israel, as a means to deal with development and gentrification in this World Heritage site.Komal Potdar explores the historical evolution of the old town, cultural geography, and the current state of exclusion and gentrification in Jaffa, Israel. She underlines the need for discourse on socio-spatial analysis and assessment for decision-making processes for urban heritage design.Diego Inglez de Souza and Ivo Pereira de Oliveira reconnect architectural history with social and industrial accounts as a strategy for understanding the relationship between infrastructure, fishing, and urbanisation by studying the emblematic case of Matosinhos, Portugal.André Tavares seeks to trace the links between fluctuations in the natural cod resources, the technologies used by fishermen to catch and process the fish, and the development of coastal landscapes and the urban form of the fishing port Gafanha da Nazaré, Portugal.And finally, Fatma Tanis uses an interview with architect Daniel Rosbottom from DHDR to provide insight into situated architecture in port cities by addressing a library and concert hall project realised in Bodø, Norway.Teachers of Practice / ASituated Architecture100% ResearchUrban Desig
CULTURAL HERITAGE CONSERVATION AND CULTURE-LED TOURISM CONFLICT WITHIN THE HISTORIC SITE IN BEYOĞLU, ISTANBUL
In the metropolitan city of Istanbul, the conservation of historic sites that are under the influence of tourism pressure is one of the central challenges of management planning. This study aims to perform a critical review, within the framework of the current conservation legislation of Turkey and ICOMOS decisions, of the conservation master plan prepared for Beyoğlu (Istanbul), particularly focusing on conflicts between cultural heritage conservation and culture-led tourism decisions. The review starts out with an analysis of Beyoğlu district in Istanbul, based on the technical expertise reports drawn from the administrative court decisions, followed by a discussion of the results. The study includes four main parts, with the first part discussing and then conceptualizing the cultural heritage conservation and culture-led tourism, the second part examining the definition of the conservation site and the conservation master plan process, the third part addressing the analysis and evaluation of the site within the context of cultural heritage, and the final part discussing the findings and drawing conclusions. Some of the findings derived from the evaluations conducted on the Beyoğlu conservation master plan are given: (a) due to the lack of a holistic planning approach, the conservation master plan boundaries fail to incorporate other historic areas in the same district; (b) the decision to reconstruct former historic buildings damages the present use of public space; (c) car-oriented transport designs increase vehicle traffic in the historic centre of the city; and (d) the existing cultural structure is undergoing “touristification” in the form of culture-led tourism development, and cultural functions are being rapidly “commercialized”. The results of the study show that the Beyoğlu (Istanbul) conservation master plan produces negative effects on the tangible and intangible heritage, publicness, public participation, culture-led tourism, and culture-led urban regeneration
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
