51 research outputs found
Mikhail Kondratyev: The Scientist and the Man
No full textRussian psychologists share their memories of Mikhail Yuryevich Kondratyev. He is remembered as the scientist and the man in a series of essays written by I.V. Vachkov (“Story of a Real Social Psychologist”), A.I. Dontsov (“My Misha”), I.G. Dubov (“The Only Thing is to Remember”), and V.A. Petrovsky (“About Misha Kondratyev”)
Lesia Ukrainka in Later Interpretations of Dmytro Dontsov: Natiosophical and Cultural Continuum
No full textУ статті проаналізовано два есеї Д. Донцова про драматичні твори Лесі
Українки «Три хвилини», «Адвокат Мартіян». Автор доводить, що ідеологічно
письменниця виражала в художніх формах консервативні, ідеалістичні й
ірраціоналістичні струмені в українській культурі початку ХХ ст. Обидва твори
мають чітку націософську проблематику, утверджують принципи історичного
волюнтаризму, національного героїзму та революціонізму як емоційно-протест-
ної енергетики буття. ter Interpretations of Dmytro Dontsov:
Natiosophical and Cultural Continuum. In this article it is analyzed two essays of
Dmytro Dontsov about the dramatic works of Lesia Ukrainka “Three Minutes” and
“Lawyer Martiyan”. The author proves that ideologically writer expressed in artistic
forms the conservative and idealistic irratsional streams in Ukrainian culture in the
early twentieth century. It is explained that it was almost the only author in the
Ukrainian literature of that time, who wrote in a such philosophical way. The cause
for this was the neo-romantic worldview of Lesia Ukrainka, her individual and heroic
spirits. At the same time it is granted attention to the evolution of the outlook of
Dmytro Dontsov as the most brilliant Ukrainian theorist of traditionalism and
philosophical irrationalism in the article. It is granted the main attention to the
analysis of the ideological concepts of Lesіa Ukrainka in these dramatic poems,
which concentrated her main political views on the modern history of Ukraine in
itself. Both works have a clear natsiosofski problems, affirm the principles of historic
voluntarism, national heroism and revolutionism as emotional and protest energy of
being
Hegel, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche in the work Nationalism by D. Dontsov
No full textTitle: Hegel, Schopenhauer and Nietzsche in the work Nationalism by D. Dontsov Author: Mgr. Ivanna Dovhoruk Department: The Department of Political Science Supervisor: prof. Dr. Pavel Barša, M.A., Ph.D. Abstract This master thesis provides a political-philosophical inquiry of the treatise called ,,Nationalism" (Націоналізм; 1926) written by the ideologist of Ukrainian nationalism Dmytro Dontsov (Дмитро Донцов; 1883-1973), in which he conceptualizes his own theory of active nationalism (чинний націоналізм). Dontsov argues that the idea of a nation consists in the national will (воля нації), and introduces the concept of the will primarily with regard to the concepts of three German philosophers - G. W. F. Hegel (substantieller Wille), Arthur Schopenhauer (Wille zum Leben), and Friedrich Nietzsche (Wille zur Macht). In this inquiry we shall address the question of how Dmytro Dontsov worked philosophically with different notions of will of two different wings of German thought, and what conclusions can be drawn from the theory of nationalism, which is based on the philosophical concept. The first and second chapters are merely preparatory. The third chapter represents reading of Nationalism on the one hand, and the related works of Hegel, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche on the other. The fourth chapter shall be...Název práce: Hegel, Schopenhauer a Nietzsche v díle Nacionalismus D. Dontsova Autor: Mgr. Ivanna Dovhoruk Katedra/Ústav: Ústav politologie Vedoucí: prof. Dr. Pavel Barša, M.A., Ph.D. Abstrakt Tato diplomová práce představuje politicko-filosofické zkoumání díla ,,Nacionalismus" (1926) ideologa ukrajinského nacionalismu Dmytra Dontsova (Дмитро Донцов; 1883 - 1973), v němž autor konceptualizuje vlastní teorii aktivního nacionalismu (чинний націоналізм). Dontsov tvrdí, že idea národa spočívá v nacionální vůli (воля нації). Pojem vůle představuje autor Nacionalismu především s ohledem na koncepce tří německých filosofů - G. W. F. Hegela (substantieller Wille), Arthura Schopenhauera (Wille zum Leben), a Friedricha Nietzsche (Wille zur Macht). Budeme se zabývat otázkou, jak D. Dontsov filosoficky pracoval s různými pojmy vůle dvou odlišných křídel německého myšlení, a jaké plynou závěry pro politickou teorii nacionalismu založené na filosofickém konceptu vůle. První a druhá kapitola jsou pouze vstupní částí. Třetí kapitola se věnuje výkladu Nacionalismu na jedné straně, a relevantně souvisejících děl Hegela, Schopenhauera, a Nietzsche na straně druhé. Ve čtvrté kapitole interpretujeme svá zjištění v rámci tázání se po možné (ne)kompatibilitě Dontsovova odkazování k pojmu vůle u německých filosofů. Kapitola 5....Institute of Political ScienceÚstav politologieFilozofická fakultaFaculty of Art
Nationlism as Religion: the Case of Dmytro Dontsov and the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) in the 1920s and 1930s
No full textІдеологія Дмитра Донцова та пропаганда Організації українських націоналістів розглядаються крізь призму теорії політичних релігій Еміліо Джентіле. Автор доводить, що українські націоналісти 1920-1930-х років свідомо вдавалися до сакралізації політики, виявляючи тенденцію до творення власної політичної релігії. Проте з ряду причин український інтегральний націоналізм не перетворився на політичну релігію такою мірою, як сучасні йому тоталітарні ідейно-політичні течії в Европі.The ideology of Dmytro Dontsov and the OUN’s propaganda are examined through the prism of Emilio Gentile’s theory of political religions. The author argues that Ukrainian nationalists in the 1920-30s deliberately adopted sacralization of politics as their policy in an attempt to create their own political religion ideology. However, integral Ukrainian nationalism failed, for a number of reasons, to transform itself into a political religion to the same extent as was observed contemporaneously in other parts of Europe
Reasons for Migration Decision Making and Migrants Security Notions
No full textAbstractMigration is considered in terms of social psychology through the eyes of its immediate participants. It is argued that the decision to migrate is closely connected with security issues. The survey sample consisted of 80 migrants from former CIS countries. Main motives of going abroad treated in categories of “factual constraint” and “search for better life” were detected. It is indicated that mundane consciousness does not generalize migration reasons with regard to security categories. Migrants’ security notions under study demonstrate specifics of perceiving the surrounding world as threatening and dangerous
Dmytro Doncow i Polska – dwa mity
No full textTekst stanowi próbę spojrzenia na stosunek najważniejszego ideologa ukraińskiego nacjonalizmu integralnego Dmytra Doncowa wobec Polski w oparciu o opracowanie źrodła reprezentatywnego dla tej problematyki. Doncow ostrzega ukraińską społeczność przed orientacją na Polskę wobec wzrostu wpływów rosyjskich nad Wisłą oraz słabnięciem tam ducha tzw. wojowniczego zachodu.The article is the edition of the source text „Is it West?” by Dmytro Dontsov, which was published in the Lviv „Vistnyk” in May 1934. The paper refers to the Ukrainian nationalist ideologist’s attitude to the nationalism towards Poland. However, on the one hand the article contradicts common opinions of the author Polophilia, but on the other, indicates that for the main enemy Dontsov considered Russia
THE PRAGMATIC PERSPECTIVE OF DMYTRO DONTSOV’S WORKS: ARGUMENTATION STRATEGIES
No full textThe leading role in anthropocentric studies belongs to linguopragmatics, since it is a manifestation of
the human factor at all levels of language. The synthesis of views expressed in Dontsov’s works is usually
based on antitheses having a specific communicative task: to compare positive and negative aspects, or
otherwise contrast Dontsov`s position with a different position. The article is aimed at examining the
pragmatic aspect of Dontsov`s texts using the example of antithesis. Achieving this aim involves solving
the following tasks: 1) characterize the ways Dmytro Dontsov`s pragmatic intentions are implemented; 2)
identify Dontsov`s strategy and show the methods of its argumentation in a journalistic text; 3) analyze
the text synergetics as the main means of expressing the author’s communicative and pragmatic potential.
The study uses the method of argument, subjectivity, intent analysis, and the method of content analysis.
It also applies linguistic observation and descriptive methods as additional methods.
Research results. Dontsov`s texts were used as a basis to characterize the ways of implementing
pragmatic intentions aimed at forming national principles. The study focuses on identifying the subjective
factor in his works and showing the nature of the pragmatization of statements reproducing antitheses.
The relevance of the study is determined by the pragmatic features of Dmytro Dontsov`s works and his
active approach to selecting lexical and semantic constructions to achieve the communicative goal. The
thinker successfully uses the antithesis in his works, as the information reaches the addressee through
the display of positive and negative plates and results in the formation of ideas of aggressiveness, and
certainty as opposed to passivity and tearfulness. It is important that Dontsov`s works have a hidden
meaning because each historical period gives a different understanding of the social and political situation.
The basic strategy used by Dontsov to express the communicative potential is the antithesis analyzed on
the basis of the semantic component of “sovereign Ukraine”. Based on the antithesis, the argumentative
field of the author`s influence on the reader can be conveniently classified into levels (semantic, lexical,
stylistic, and syntactic) creating a synergy of the text. The argumentative material influencing the reader
at the semantic level is emotionally expressive vocabulary (figurative, colloquial words, etc.), so this is
an emotional level. The lexical level is a reproduction of the author`s position, his ability to create new
meanings, use scientific lexis, and argue with specific proper names (this is an intellectual and historical
level). The pragmatic intention of the author is achieved at the stylistic level through stylistic devices, such
as comparisons, individual-author metaphors, and epithets (this is an aesthetic level). The syntactic level
replicates Dontsov`s thoughts full of dependent clauses, amplifications, rhetorical questions, and citations.
In Dmytro Dontsov`s texts we distinguish: 1) thesis argumentation, where each statement is sufficient to
confirm opinion); 2) chain (sequential) argumentation, congesting a sequence of arguments; 3) extensive
argumentation, where the author substantiates several opinions at the same time; 4) multi-vector
argumentation, when different types of argumentation are combined. All these argumentative elements
form a complex cognitive structure, which we define as convergent (linear) thinking and divergent thinking
with branched and multiple arguments. It is proved that on the syntax level the most used is divergent type
of argumentation. We consider this level to be a direction of his political actions. Particularly coherent and
convincing is a synergistic (existential) level that reproduces the author`s views and his ability to work with
words. However, such a division into levels is conditional, since the main features of these levels are always
supplemented by additional ones, for example, the lexical level or the syntactic level are also filled with
emotional lexemes. The pragmatic factor of Dmytro Dontsov`s worldview becomes clear after reading his
works, which become guidelines for changing public consciousness and forming the line of the struggle for
a Ukrainian independent state. Thus, antitheses used by the journalist affirm (according to the terminology
of pragmatics, a change strategy) the reader’s opinions (or mental activity)
Dmytro Doncow i Polska – dwa mity
No full textTekst stanowi próbę spojrzenia na stosunek najważniejszego ideologa ukraińskiego nacjonalizmu integralnego Dmytra Doncowa wobec Polski w oparciu o opracowanie źrodła reprezentatywnego dla tej problematyki. Doncow ostrzega ukraińską społeczność przed orientacją na Polskę wobec wzrostu wpływów rosyjskich nad Wisłą oraz słabnięciem tam ducha tzw. wojowniczego zachodu.The article is the edition of the source text „Is it West?” by Dmytro Dontsov, which was published in the Lviv „Vistnyk” in May 1934. The paper refers to the Ukrainian nationalist ideologist’s attitude to the nationalism towards Poland. However, on the one hand the article contradicts common opinions of the author Polophilia, but on the other, indicates that for the main enemy Dontsov considered Russia
- …
