1,721,000 research outputs found
J. André, R. Bloch et A. Rouveret, Pline l'Ancien. Histoire Naturelle. Livre XXXVI
Delvoye Charles. J. André, R. Bloch et A. Rouveret, Pline l'Ancien. Histoire Naturelle. Livre XXXVI. In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 55, 1986. pp. 460-461
R. Bloch, D. Briquel, Ch. Guittard, A. Rouveret. Recherches sur les religions de l'Italie antique
Turcan Robert. R. Bloch, D. Briquel, Ch. Guittard, A. Rouveret. Recherches sur les religions de l'Italie antique. In: Revue de l'histoire des religions, tome 192, n°2, 1977. pp. 199-203
Thèmes mythologiques dans les peintures funéraires de Cyrène et de Cyrénaïque : de la collection d’images à la rhétorique de la laudatio funebris
Pittura romana. Dall'ellenismo al tardo-antico
Il volume propone un'analisi contestuale della produzione pittorica di età romana per ambiti cronologici e geografici. L'approccio metodologico punta ad interpretare i documenti non solo nel loro aspetto formale, ma anche come autentico linguaggio per immagini, rivelore di precisce scelte da parte della committenz
Reinach (Adolphe).Textes grecs et latins relatifs à l' histoire de la peinture ancienne. Recueil Milliet. /Introduction et notes par A. Rouveret., 1985
Schnapp Alain. Reinach (Adolphe).Textes grecs et latins relatifs à l' histoire de la peinture ancienne. Recueil Milliet. /Introduction et notes par A. Rouveret., 1985. In: Les Nouvelles de l'archéologie, n°21, automne 1985. pp. 99-100
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
