1,737,894 research outputs found

    Resolución Rectorales 965/2019. Aprobar el procedimiento de solicitudes comunicacionales de la Universidad Nacional de Río Negro.

    No full text
    Fil: Rector (R). Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Río Negro, ArgentinaResolución Rectorales 965/2019. Aprobar el procedimiento de solicitudes comunicacionales de la Universidad Nacional de Río Negro.fals

    UMNH:Mamm:965

    No full text
    UMNH:Mamm:965 Voucher Specimen Study Ski

    Santa Fe (ATSF) 965

    No full text
    A photograph print showing Santa Fe (ATSF) 965, 2-8-0, Barstow, CA

    Inscriptions 946 à 965

    No full text
    Inscriptions 946 à 965. In: Revue épigraphique du Midi de la France, tome 3, N°70, 1893. pp. 227-239

    RAAPRAPPORT 965

    No full text
    onderzoeksrappor

    Figures 965-966. Ventrites. 965 in Morphology of Baridinae and related groups (Coleoptera, Curculionidae)

    No full text
    Figures 965-966. Ventrites. 965, Cyllophorus fasciatus; 966, Parorobitis gibbus.Published as part of Davis, Steve, 2009, Morphology of Baridinae and related groups (Coleoptera, Curculionidae), pp. 1-136 in ZooKeys 10 on page 124, DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.10.47, http://zenodo.org/record/57645

    RAAPNOTITIE 965

    No full text
    onderzoeksrappor

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Mean WTP (<i>N =</i> 965).

    No full text
    Mean WTP (N = 965).</p
    corecore