1,738,963 research outputs found
Grammar [931]
No full textGrammar.
This manuscript is now IO Islamic B22 in the India Office collections.
[metadata: Otto Loth, A Catalogue of the Arabic Manuscripts in the Library of the India Office, (volume 1), no. 931 here with further notations and hyperlinks].
931.
B 22. Size 83/4 in. by 51/2 in.; foll. 293. Seventeen lines in a page.
Another copy of the same Glosses, imperfect at the beginning.
Written by different hands, mostly in Nasta’lîḳ.
The first gloss is: ( قوله ) اعنى علامه ( علامته . r ) اى علامة المنصرف الخ ( = fol. 64v. in the preceding no.).
Inscribed هذا كتاب حاشيه رضى در علم نحو .
Cf. Catal. 235, iii. 16
Santa Fe (ATSF) 931
No full textA photograph print showing Santa Fe (ATSF) 931, 2-10-2, Argentine Yard, Kansas City, KS
Inscriptions 931 à 945
No full textInscriptions 931 à 945. In: Revue épigraphique du Midi de la France, tome 3, N°69, 1893. pp. 211-219
Waggener, David (FA 931)
Get PDFFinding aid only for Folklife Archives Project 931. Project titled: “Epitaphs.” Includes introduction of gravestone epitaphs and a list of cemeteries in McLean County and Ohio County, Kentucky
El Tlacuache Núm. 931 (2020). 931 Año 19 (2020) mayo. El Tlacuache
No full text- Culto a los ancestros en Tlayacapan por Raúl Francisco González Quezada
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
