1,724,556 research outputs found
J1721+8842: The first Einstein zigzag len
No full textINDEXACION SCOPUSWe report the discovery of the first example of an Einstein zigzag lens, an extremely rare lensing configuration. In this system, J1721+8842, six images of the same background quasar are formed by two intervening galaxies, one at redshift z1 = 0.184 and another at z2 = 1.885. Two out of the six multiple images are deflected in opposite directions as they pass the first lens galaxy on one side and the second on the other side – the optical paths forming zigzags between the two deflectors. In this paper we demonstrate that J1721+8842, previously thought to be a lensed dual quasar, is in fact a compound lens, with the more distant lens galaxy also being distorted as an arc by the foreground galaxy. Evidence supporting this unusual lensing scenario includes: (1) identical light curves in all six lensed quasar images obtained from two years of monitoring at the Nordic Optical Telescope; (2) detection of the additional deflector at redshift z2 = 1.885 in JWST/NIRSpec integral field unit data; and (3) a multiple-plane lens model reproducing the observed image positions. This unique configuration offers the opportunity to combine two major lensing cosmological probes, time-delay cosmography and dual source-plane lensing, since J1721+8842 features multiple lensed sources that form two distinct Einstein radii of different sizes, one of which is a variable quasar. We expect to place tight constraints on H0 and w by combining these two probes of the same system. The z2 = 1.885 deflector, a quiescent galaxy, is also the highest-redshift strong galaxy-scale lens with a spectroscopic redshift measurement known to date. © The Authors 2025
J1721+8842: The first Einstein zigzag lens
Full text linkWe report the discovery of the first example of an Einstein zigzag lens, an extremely rare lensing configuration. In this system, J1721+8842, six images of the same background quasar are formed by two intervening galaxies, one at redshift z1 = 0.184 and another at z2 = 1.885. Two out of the six multiple images are deflected in opposite directions as they pass the first lens galaxy on one side and the second on the other side – the optical paths forming zigzags between the two deflectors. In this paper we demonstrate that J1721+8842, previously thought to be a lensed dual quasar, is in fact a compound lens, with the more distant lens galaxy also being distorted as an arc by the foreground galaxy. Evidence supporting this unusual lensing scenario includes: (1) identical light curves in all six lensed quasar images obtained from two years of monitoring at the Nordic Optical Telescope; (2) detection of the additional deflector at redshift z2 = 1.885 in JWST/NIRSpec integral field unit data; and (3) a multiple-plane lens model reproducing the observed image positions. This unique configuration offers the opportunity to combine two major lensing cosmological probes, time-delay cosmography and dual source-plane lensing, since J1721+8842 features multiple lensed sources that form two distinct Einstein radii of different sizes, one of which is a variable quasar. We expect to place tight constraints on H0 and w by combining these two probes of the same system. The z2 = 1.885 deflector, a quiescent galaxy, is also the highest-redshift strong galaxy-scale lens with a spectroscopic redshift measurement known to date
J1721+8842: The first Einstein zigzag lens
No full textIndexación: Scopus.We report the discovery of the first example of an Einstein zigzag lens, an extremely rare lensing configuration. In this system, J1721+8842, six images of the same background quasar are formed by two intervening galaxies, one at redshift z1 = 0.184 and another at z2 = 1.885. Two out of the six multiple images are deflected in opposite directions as they pass the first lens galaxy on one side and the second on the other side – the optical paths forming zigzags between the two deflectors. In this paper we demonstrate that J1721+8842, previously thought to be a lensed dual quasar, is in fact a compound lens, with the more distant lens galaxy also being distorted as an arc by the foreground galaxy. Evidence supporting this unusual lensing scenario includes: (1) identical light curves in all six lensed quasar images obtained from two years of monitoring at the Nordic Optical Telescope; (2) detection of the additional deflector at redshift z2 = 1.885 in JWST/NIRSpec integral field unit data; and (3) a multiple-plane lens model reproducing the observed image positions. This unique configuration offers the opportunity to combine two major lensing cosmological probes, time-delay cosmography and dual source-plane lensing, since J1721+8842 features multiple lensed sources that form two distinct Einstein radii of different sizes, one of which is a variable quasar. We expect to place tight constraints on H0 and w by combining these two probes of the same system. The z2 = 1.885 deflector, a quiescent galaxy, is also the highest-redshift strong galaxy-scale lens with a spectroscopic redshift measurement known to date. © The Authors 2025.https://www-scopus-com.recursosbiblioteca.unab.cl/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85219586477&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=788efc714764f31615eae1d9dcdc3afb&sot=aff&sdt=cl&cluster=scofreetoread%2C%22all%22%2Ct%2Bscosubtype%2C%22ar%22%2Ct&s=AF-ID%2860002636%29+AND+SUBJAREA%28PHYS%29&sl=34&sessionSearchId=788efc714764f31615eae1d9dcdc3afb&relpos=2
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
