1,740,320 research outputs found
Ms. Douai 842: a new testimony of the Liber Chronicorum by Pelagius of Oviedo
No full textThis paper focuses on manuscript Douai 842, which was copied at the end of the twelfth century at the monastery of Sainte-Rictrude of Marchiennes, Southern Flanders. This manuscript transmits an unknown version of the Liber chronicorum – Compilation B, which originated at the scriptorium of Pelagius of Oviedo (?-1153). After providing a brief description of the manuscript’s structure and contents, I argue that there were at least two versions of Compilation B (rather than just one, as previously believed, represented by the well known copy in Madrid, BNE, 1513), with Douai 842 transmitting the oldest. I contend that this version attests to the existence of a primitive form of Compilation B, representing a distinct branch within the tradition of the Liber. Finally, I suggest that Douai 842 was copied between 1177-1179.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Kentucky bluegrass production
No full textBulletin no. 842 Moscow, Idaho :University of Idaho, College of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension System, 2005-01-01. Author(s): Holman, John D.; Thill, Don
Mabin, Victor Grace, 842
No full textThis record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/400527Surname: MABIN. Given Name(s) or Initials: VICTOR GRACE. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 842. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 56026.219056
Item: [2016.0049.32820] "Mabin, Victor Grace, 842
Inscriptions 842 à 845
No full textInscriptions 842 à 845. In: Revue épigraphique du Midi de la France, tome 3, N°60, 1891. pp. 66-69
Participant’s sociodemographic characteristics (N = 842).
No full textParticipant’s sociodemographic characteristics (N = 842).</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
