1,720,994 research outputs found
Basic study for overcoming "history dispute" over Gaogouli/Koguryo and Bohai/Parhae between China and Korea
Full text link本研究では、中韓両国の高句麗・渤海をめぐる論争の経緯を明らかにしたうえで、次の３点の成果が得られた。 ①唐代の国際システムは、中国の「内」「外」と、指標によってどちらにもなりうる中間ゾーンという三層構造で、それは時代によって変動するものであること。②高句麗はその三層構造の「外」の存在であり、渤海は中間ゾーンの存在で、時間経過とともに「外」に移行したこと、③渤海史の叙述方法には、いくつかの歴史的な広域地域にまたがる存在として叙述する方法があること。In this study, I clarified the process of “history dispute” over Gaogouli/Koguryo and Bohai/Parhae between China and Korea, and got three following result.
(1)International system of Tang dynasty was made of three-layer structure which consisted of “inner zone”,“ outside zone” and “middle zone”, which might be sorted “inner zone” or “outside zone” by an index, and varied according to times. (2)In Tang dynasty, Gaogouli/Koguryo was positioned as “outside zine” of the three-layer structure, and Bohai/Parhae was positioned at first as “middle zone”, but was changed to positioning as “outside zone” over time. (3)For a description method of the history of Bohai/Palhae, there is a method to describe as the place where some historical meta-areas mixed.研究課題/領域番号:23520861, 研究期間(年度):2011-04-28 – 2015-03-31出典：研究課題「高句麗・渤海をめぐる中国・韓国の「歴史論争」克服のための基礎的研究」課題番号23520861
（KAKEN：科学研究費助成事業データベース（国立情報学研究所））
（https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/report/KAKENHI-PROJECT-23520861/RECORD-23520861seika/）を加工して作成金沢大学人間社会研究域歴史言語文化学系research repor
A basic research for the restoration of The TANG HUI-YAO 『唐会要』
Full text link王溥『唐会要』を復元するための基礎的な作業として、当初から以下の3点を中心に研究を進める予定であった。 (1)『唐会要』の通行本と諸抄本・四庫全書本との異同を全て明らかにする。 (2)『唐会要』を引用する各種文献のうち、最も多く所引記事を持つ『玉海』と、それに次ぐ『事物紀原』について、これらのテキスト調査を行ったうえで、所引記事を整理して利用しやすいように一覧化する。 (3)国内外の目録類に載せられた『唐会要』諸抄本の情報を収集し、抄本の伝存過程を追求し、現存する諸テキストの位置づけを明らかにするとともに、未知見のテキストの発掘に力を注ぐ。 このうち、(3)については現存する諸テキストの伝存過程と位置づけがほぼ確定したので、「唐会要の流伝に関する一考察」(『東洋史研究』57巻1号、1998)と題して発表した。そこでは、南宋高宗期抄本が諸抄本のもとであることや宋刻本が節略本と推定されることなどが明らかにされている。(1)(2)は成果の公表までは至れなかったが、(1)のテキスト間の異同問題については、作業を終了したところから順次発表する予定である。(2)も『玉海』所引記事の一覧表の公表準備は終わり、来年度中には順次発表する予定で、『事物紀原』もカード化作業は終わり、一覧化に移っている。研究成果報告書には、(3)の成果の中間報告として、「『事物紀原』所引『唐会要』記事のカード化について」を掲載し、カード取りの方法論と全カード91枚を公表している。My first plan of a basic research for the restoration of the Tang hui-yao 『唐会要』 was as follows :
(1) A research of all difference among many versions which is the popular version, the three manuscript copies, and the text included in the Ssu-ku chusn-shu 『唐会要』.
(2) A research of the quotations from the Tang hui-yao in the Yu-hai 『唐会要』 and the Shi-wu ji-yuan 『唐会要』, and making a list of these quotations.
(3) A research of the data of the manuscript copies, and a study on the circulation of the Tang hui-yao based on this research.
As a result of these research, on the results of (3) , I published "A STUDY ON CIRCULATION OF THE TANG HUI-YAO 『唐会要』" in THE TOYOSHI-KENKYU (The Journal of Oriental Researches), Voi.57 No.1. This paper clarified that the original texts on which eight old manuscuripts of the Tang hui-yao were based include the one made in the regin of the Enperor Gao-zong 『唐会要』 of the Southen Song, the version engreved by the year of 1046 was an excerpt version, and so on. The results of (1) and (2) have not yet been made public, but I intend to publish the results of (1) from the next year one by one, and a list of the quotations from the Tang hui-yao in the Yu-hai have already made and the publication of this list is due from the next year one by one, too. The cards on the quotations from the Tang hui-yao in the Shi-wu ji-yuan have already made, and I making a list of these quotations. In a report on this research project, "ON THE CARDS OF THE QUOTATIONS FROM THE TANG HUI-YAO IN THE SHI-WU JI-YUAN" which is an interim report of the results of (2) run.研究課題/領域番号:09610364, 研究期間(年度):1997–1999出典：「王溥『唐会要』復元のための基礎的研究」研究成果報告書 課題番号09610364
(KAKEN：科学研究費助成事業データベース（国立情報学研究所）)
本文データは著者版報告書より作成research repor
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
中国の渤海史研究草創期についての史学史的研究: 金毓黻を中心に
Full text link金毓黻の『渤海國志長編』は、満洲事変で軟禁中の1931年11月に執筆を開始し、解放された12月に大体を書き上げたが、初稿は1932年1月に完成し、改稿・増補を経て、1934年5月に刊行された。彼は渤海領域図に旧地名を入れ、満洲国否定の意思を明確にしたが、その説明をする「叙例」を1931年12月作成と記し、日本側に真意を悟られないようにした。当時の彼の満洲国否定意識は、愛国より愛郷によるもので、彼には中国東北を蔑ろにしてきた中央への批判意識もあった。日本批判とは裏腹に、日本人研究者と密接に交流しており、亡命後も相互に尊敬しあう姿も確認できた。そこには現在の論争を解くヒントを見ることができる。“Bohaiguozhichangbian” written by Jin Yuhu began writing in November 1931 when he was placed under house arrest by Japanese army in the Manchurian Incident and was mostly written up in December 1931 when he was released. After that, the first draft of this book was completed in January 1932,the final draft was published in May 1934. He expressed he gave a denial to the Manchu Empire by putting the pre-Manchu-Empire place name in the Bohai territory map, and he wrote the fictional date of "Preface and Legend" as December 1931 writing, as Japanese failed to notice his real intention. His denial of Manchu Empire was by localism rather than nationalism at that time. He was in close contact with Japanese researchers, contrary to his sense of criticism towards Japan, and he and Japanese researchers respected each other even after he was exiled to China.We can find tips to overcome the controversy about Bohai's belonging in their friendships.研究課題/領域番号:15K02892, 研究期間(年度):2015-04-01 - 2019-03-31出典：研究課題「中国の渤海史研究草創期についての史学史的研究: 金毓黻を中心に」課題番号15K02892
（KAKEN：科学研究費助成事業データベース（国立情報学研究所））
（https://kaken.nii.ac.jp/report/KAKENHI-PROJECT-15K02892/15K02892seika/)を加工して作成research repor
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
