1,742,860 research outputs found
Recombinant MCP-1 administration overcomes I-BET-762-mediated suppression of AHR and inflammation.
No full textMice were administered IFNγ/LPS/rMCP-1 i.t at 0h. Some groups were treated with I-BET-762 i.v 1h before and 4h after IFNγ/LPS/rMCP-1 exposure. Endpoints were assessed at 12h. Effect of I-BET-762 administration on AHR (A/B) and BALF neutrophil (C) and macrophage numbers (D), MCP-1, KC, TNFα, IL-27p28 and IFNγ mRNA levels (A), and protein levels (B) in whole lung tissue, MCP-1 and KC levels in the BALF (D). n = 6–8 mice per group, presented as mean ± SEM. *Designates significant differences to PBS-treated controls (*P#Designates significant differences from IFNγ/LPS/MCP-1/I-BET-762-treated mice (#P##P<0.01).</p
Mathematics and Astronomy [762]
No full textMathematics and Astronomy.
This manuscript is now IO Islamic B45 in the India Office collections.
[metadata: Otto Loth, A Catalogue of the Arabic Manuscripts in the Library of the India Office, (volume 1), no. 762 here with further notations and hyperlinks].
762.
B 45. Size 91/2 in. by 51/2 in. ; foll. 16. Twenty one lines in a page.
The first portion of a Commentary (ممزوج) on the خلاصة الحساب , by Ḥâjjî Ḥusain YAZDÎ.
The preface begins: نحمدك يا من هو منه الابتداء و الاختتام . The author refers in it to an earlier commentary of his, entitled المبين . The commentary begins: و قال المص دام ظله العالى مقدمة فى امور ستة تعريف علم الحساب الخ.
It breaks off in the middle of Chapter II., the rest of the MS. being lost.
Written in a small hurried Nasta’liḳ, on red paper. Of about the eleventh century.
Inscribed خلاصة الحساب الخ
Your income sources after retirement
No full textBulletin no. 762 Moscow, Idaho :University of Idaho, College of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension System, 1994-04-01. Author(s): Lawroski, Mary An
Commento all'art. 762 c.p.c.
No full textIl breve contributo verte sui termini per la rimozione dei sigilli, ai sensi dell'art. 762 c.p.c
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Resolución UNRN N° 762/2009. Sustitúyase el Artículo 3° de las Resoluciones UNRN N° 28/2009, UNRN N° 48/2009 y UNRN N° 50/2009.
No full textFil: Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (U). Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Río Negro, ArgentinaResolución UNRN N° 762/2009. Sustitúyase el Artículo 3° de las Resoluciones UNRN N° 28/2009, UNRN N° 48/2009 y UNRN N° 50/2009.fals
- …
