1,724,549 research outputs found

    Santa Fe (ATSF) 3771

    No full text
    A photograph postcard showing Santa Fe 3771, 4-8-4, Los Angeles, CA

    Ryan, Patrick, 3771

    No full text
    This record was harvested from a previous catalogue system and will be withdrawn in 2025. Information in this record may be superseded or incomplete. Visit this record in UMA's new catalogue at: https://archives.library.unimelb.edu.au/nodes/view/414877Surname: RYAN. Given Name(s) or Initials: PATRICK. Military Service Number or Last Known Location: 3771. Missing, Wounded and Prisoner of War Enquiry Card Index Number: 47684.234978 Item: [2016.0049.47138] "Ryan, Patrick, 3771

    Santa Fe (ATSF) 3771 on "California Limited"

    No full text
    A photograph print showing Santa Fe 3771, 4-8-4, on 2nd section (of 3) of passenger train, "California Limited", westbound near Victorville, CA

    Block Card 3771 Driftwood Road

    No full text
    This image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: Cape Cod Style | 3771 Driftwood Road (Toledo, Ohio) | Dwelling | Highland Greens (Toledo, Ohio) | South Toledo Area (Toledo, Ohio

    Block Card 3771 Elmlawn Drive

    No full text
    This image was produced by the Auditor's Office in Lucas County, Ohio for tax assessment purposes. Associated dates are approximate. Descriptive terms related to this photograph include: 3771 Elmlawn Drive (Toledo, Ohio) | Heatherway Plat (Toledo, Ohio) | South Toledo Area (Toledo, Ohio) | Split-Level Style | Dwellin

    Punctuation system in the 17th century London, Wellcome Library, MS. 3771.

    Full text link
    Medieval manuscripts were mostly designed to be read aloud, constructing the punctuation system to preserve the ‘reader’s breath’; not giving much consideration to the grammatical construction of the work (Hector 1958, 45). Even though the punctuation displayed in the medieval book varies substantially from the modern punctuation system, the medieval symbols coincide in appearance with the contemporary elements (Clemens & Graham 2007, 82). Nevertheless, with the introduction of the printing system in the Renaissance period, the printers provided order to the chaotic punctuation system. Printing favoured the development of standardisation, ‘but its own system did not entirely conform to modern usage, and, in any case, manuscripts generally employed much lighter and less consistent punctuation than printed books’ (Petti 1977, 25). This paper is concerned with the 17th-century English remedy book housed in London, Wellcome Library, MS. 3771, written by Doctor William Parnell (1685). MS. 3771 displays a collection of medical recipes arranged in an alphabetical distribution (chronologically displaying the prescriptions, that are enumerated within each letter), and, for the purpose, it makes use of different punctuation symbols for the expression of the different grammatical and rhetorical needs, such as the period, comma, colon, semicolon, virgule, and line-fillers, among others. In view of this, the paper describes the deployment of punctuation marks in MS. 3771 examining the punctuation system used by Dr. Parnell of MS. 3771 to shed light on the use and function of these marks and determine if there is any conventional system in his writing.Universidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore